Hi Midget,
Well, ahem, stayed up until 04:30am CDST reading all 64 pages of your build blog. My curiosity has been piqued, to say the least. Several thoughts have occurred to me since our conversation and thence reading the build diary. In no particular order, here goes:
1) Stop using the stock clutch slave cylinder immediately. Use a modified Saab center mount, on the input shaft sleeve of the trans, with a remote bleeder on the firewall. Plumb this with aeroquip. A good machinist can fabricate the adaptor. This setup is now probably available complete through specialty Spridget/Mini folks. This solves the problem of bleeding the clutch AND gives more clearance to the frame in a tight spot. I don't know what your clutch finger height is and this is critical for proper setup since the Saab slave cylinder has limited travel. The length of the adaptor to mount the slave cylinder will need to be very precise. And do not forget that as the clutch disc wears, the pressure plate fingers MOVE TO THE REAR OF THE CAR. Not having enough clearance between the throw out bearing face and the fingers results in....potential clutch slippage and crank/thrust washer WEAR. This needs to be worked out with the engine/trans on the work bench. (I no longer willing to work on the floor or in the dirt.....ageing is such a pain!)
2) I am just thinking out loud here and getting ahead of where you are in the car's development. But I am wondering if you are allowed to run a Spridget trans with Hewland gears inside? These exist, and although expensive, I am wondering if said item allows overdrive/underdrive top gear ratios? Does anyone out there know? My thought is that Hewland gears allow top gear splits on the order of .04 difference. Your standard trans 4th gear ratio is: 1 to 1. Your diff ratios options are 4.22/1 & 3.90/1 If you get close to the I/GT (?) record at some point, splits on 4th gear ratio of: .92/1; .96/1; 1.04/1; 1.08/1; etc, MIGHT prove useful in setting a new record. OR.... is there a 4.10/1 or 4.11/1 diff available for these beasts?
3) Have several thoughts on your engine issues, but I want to get my thoughts in order first. I will say this though, after 35 years of building & dyno tuning racing engines, high speed misfires (even slight ones) are typically 3 things:
A) Poor/inadequate fuel delivery and/or fuel curve drastically rich/lean. Putting my Weber thoughts in order before posting.
B) Ignition timing inadequate (poor spark at/in combustion chamber) or ignition timing significantly off from what is required. Talking about ignition timing in terms of crank degrees is meaningless here. My experience is that rod length/stroke ratios have significant impact on "crankshaft degrees of ignition timing". This is because ultra long rod length/stroke ratios (as you have) cause the piston to "dwell" more BTDC & ATDC. (Causing decreased valve/piston clearance as well) Rather than think in crank degrees, think in terms of piston movement in thousanths of an inch, BTDC. Also, along these same lines regarding ignition timing: spark plug type (not manufacturer) DRAMATICALLY AFFECTS TOTAL TIMING, HOWEVER YOU MEASURE IT!!! A retracted gap spark plug requires MORE ignition than a projected nose spark plug! THINK ABOUT IT..... it is about the total length of the flame path in the combustion chamber. Shorter flame path = less total ignition timing required. Longer flame path = more total ignition timing required. Sometimes the physical requirements of the engine or the heat of combustion (ie: Top Fuel) require using a short nose or retracted gap spark plug. I have seen more than one engine melted by a change from a retracted gap spark plug to a projected nose spark plug without the needed reduction in total ignition timing. "Indexing" of spark plugs can also change the ignition timing requirement. Sorry for getting a little off topic here, pet peeve of mine.

C) Inadequate valve spring pressure, both open & seated. This is a very technical subject, but in general terms: Higher valve train mass/high valve train moment of inertia/higher engine speeds/higher cam flank accelerations, etc., REQUIRE more valve spring pressure to CONTROL valve train motion. Years ago I did some 1275 engine development for a friend who raced a Sprite in SCCA F/Production. He was always close to the front of the pack & even won the occasional National race. One session on the dyno revealed an engine that would not run above 7000rpm with heavy load. Keep in mind that this was a quasi-competitive car/engine/driver combo. A valve spring change resulted in an engine that would pull cleanly to 9000rpm. Some minor tuning of the carbs & ignition timing checking led to: Race win & NEW F/Production LAP RECORD AT THE JUNE SPRINTS @ ROAD AMERICA!!

IT'S ABOUT SOLVING THE PROBLEM, NOT THE SYMPTOM.

I'm sure we will talk/blog some more. Might be motivated to work for/trade parts for decent microbrew. Only one request, no more using the P****** word around a lifelong Bears fan!!!!!!!!!!!!

MB