Bill, here's how it will work.
I'm arranging to get the extra bar welded in between the main hoop and the rear upright. I'm thinking that while I have the thing apart, I'll probably have the steel hinged lateral restraint welded to the cage, too. That way, it becomes integrated into the cage and forms yet another solid seat attachment point.
As to the overall height of me with respect to the cage, while Tony's point is good, I really had not anticipated it being a problem until today. All of the indications the rule book have given me is that they want close confinement of the helmet in the cage, which I've got, and will have improved upon. As to the height of the helmet with respect to the roll bar, I've simply built it to the maximum the confines of the car allow.
I anticipate being the wheel man in this ride, but above everything else, this has been a mission on getting an MG back in the record book - not me. If at tech, I find that they are uncomfortable with me and my frame taking to the salt, and that a shorter person can do it, the only problem I'll have is teaching somebody else what they'll need to know to operate it safely.
And getting them to sign a waiver . . .
![rolleyes :roll:](https://www.landracing.com/forum/Smileys/akyhne/rolleyes.gif)
Sure, I want to drive it, but in the end, it's not about me - it's about the car.
One of the peculiar aspects of the SCTA-BNI records is that they list the driver, the class, the speed, the date and the team - they never list the brand.
The team name is Milwaukee Midget Racing. If the car is swift enough to take the record, it will read Milwaukee Midget Racing. That information, along with a rudimentary understanding of the class will be sufficient for anybody with even the lightest of historical knowledge to connect the dots and know that there is an MG there.
That's really the goal for me. I
WANT to drive it, but I don't
HAVE to.
Looks like I've got a list of volunteers who will help
if it comes to that.