As all the manufacturers freely tell us, "MSD" (multiple spark discharge) only functions up to moderate engine speeds- usually around 3,500 RPM.
Coil saturation is the issue I hope this little experiment addresses, my fear being potential heat buildup in the coil packs - pulsating DC will still charge the coil, but might physically damage it, too. Input frequency of the synthesized pulsating DC remains relatively constant (8000 per second, the frequency at which the coil pack is seeing charge signal), BUT the event at which the spark is released is variable – 1500-9000 RPM.
So yes, if it works, as RPM increases (variable), the number of sparks per ignition event will decrease as a function of the shorter time the actual event occurs with respect to the pulsating DC input frequency (constant) – same as with MSD.
What I think I’m likely to see is a major initial spark, draining the collapsed coil of initial stored energy, followed by numerous smaller voltage sparks occurring at a rate of 8000 pulses per second at each sparking event until the circuit closes and the coil can actually take a full charge.
Right now, I don’t know if the coil packs can keep up.
Physical noise isolation is another issue I have yet to address for the transducers.
Working to my advantage is that the coils only produce a sparking event once per revolution, whereas if this were a standard ignition coil in a V-8, it would be required to create a spark event four times per revolution.
It’s all a grand experiment.
Hmmm, curiouser and curiouser. Is it cabin fever or inspired genius.......? 
It hasn’t been above freezing here since the February rains. I'd like to think they go hand in hand . . .