One question, is there a reason you didn't drop the front of the nose further and maybe blend it right back into the sides of the wheel skirt. I know from my own build that sometimes what people see in pictures is not practical in real life.
The pictures are a bit deceiving; in truth the body is lower that what you can see. While the sides and “hood” are relatively flat the belly pan has a concave profile. Because I made the body fit tight to the wheels the wheel skirts “ride” up on the lower radius making it look higher than it is in reality and had to de-bend some of the lower radius just to get the wheels to have some turning clearance.
In the pic you can see the wheel skirt is bottom is about 1” off the deck (it is less, I couldn’t get the jack out from under the frame because it wouldn’t get low enough!), this means that the lowest part of the body (at the apex of the belly pan) is in reality only about >3-3.5” from the salt.
The measurement of 17” at the top of the hood is done only slightly in front of the wheels meaning the nose section breaks over at about 15” (15” only seems like a number, once you put a tape on the ground and SEE 15” it is crazy low).
At this front height the body remains somewhat level front to back but is still higher in the rear. I can not lower the back without doing some serious mods and if I was to lower the front the rear would be considerably higher, I have already made pre plans for next year regarding this matter. One of the many items that I changed this year was:
1. HUGE amount of positive camber in the rear. This was only able to be change by fabing some crazy H beam linkages.
2. Because of the billet flat bottom oil pan and sidewinder exhaust on the new motor, I was able to lower the motor 1.5”……but more importantly I was able to raise the bearing-axle 2” making the axle angle almost dead level laden. (Last year my CV to wheel was like 25 degrees, even the guy in tech said “are you sure this is OK?”. I could not lower the rear without pulling the CVs out of there sockets. I could hypothetically new lower the back 2” to match the raise in the rear end and retain the bad angle…..but opted for an improved drive angle instead. I can raise the drive even more IF I cut and shorten the Rx7 axles (pushes the CV joints past the motor supports, this means I could raise the assembly about 1” allowing me to lower the car 1” in the rear.)
One thing that I still laugh about is my buddy Rich from the Hudson Boys
http://www.thehudsonboys.com/ (a great LSR site) mentioned after a discussion about why it was handling so bad and giving the car a good look over said: “If you want drama…..you are set up for it!”
Needless to say those words hit home, and I vowed that next year I don’t care how fast the car goes….as long as it goes straight
BTW:
I really thought I could get it all correct my first time, I understand now that it will take a few years to get all the bugs worked out!
-JH