The last thing LSR needs is MORE CLASSES.
I can see that running the cars that are proposed for Hot Rod classes has much to be desired. (A return to the origins of the sport, etc.etc.)
But . . . Why is it necessary to establish a bunch of new classes? I wonder how long it will be until all the record holders in these hot rod classes will be held by either a Crosley or a Chrysler Airflow sedan or a 48 Frazer, or a 48 Studebaker, or a 48 Hudson. So much for tradition.
. . . Looking at the proposed Hot Rod classes I see them as a group of current existing Classic Category classes tweaked with some additional restrictions like a narrower definition of acceptable years of production and more restrictive limits on the engines. Plus there is the requirement for functioning street equipment. All well and good but what's the point? Those classes already exist. Enter these Hot Rods in those classes.
OK, I admit I am just being a party pooper. I have not offered a solution . . . So consider this.
There are existing examples where LSR cars (and motorcycles) compete in LSR events separate from existing Bonneville classes. Look at the classes that are used for the Motorcycles in the Super Streetbike Magazine Top Speed Shootout (see
http://www.ecta-lsr.com/?page_id=130). Another good example is the VW classes that don't fit into SCTA rules but run at Bonneville. (see
http://www.burlyb.com/). These groups coordinate their efforts with existing LSR organizations (ECTA and USFRA, etc). They maintain their own set of rules and records.
Following a template like the VW 36hp Challenge, existing SCTA clubs (or a new independent group) could establish rules for Street Driven LSR Hot Rods, publish the rules, scrutinize the competitors and award the records. Nothing gets added to the SCTA/BNI rule book, no new SCTA/BNI records are established or maintained, no need to set up minimums for El Mirage and or the Bonneville 200mph club. Just good old fashioned competition like it used to be (whatever that means).