Author Topic: new 2011 rule changes  (Read 103123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #285 on: December 05, 2010, 03:49:59 PM »
Thank you Charles,

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #286 on: December 06, 2010, 11:06:56 AM »
A quick comment on something other than the helmet restraint topic. I see that the equiv. displacement rule for rotary engines has finely been made to something reasonable. The multiplier is now 2 times sweep volume, it was 3 times. This is making me reconsider the power plant for my future lakester.

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.

Offline maguromic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1736
    • http://www.barringtontea.com
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #287 on: December 06, 2010, 11:16:24 AM »
Hmm!  :evil:  Tony
“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”

Offline Stan Back

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5890
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #288 on: December 06, 2010, 11:20:35 AM »
It's liable to get noisey out there.
Past (Only) Member of the San Berdoo Roadsters -- "California's Most-Exclusive Roadster Club" -- 19 Years of Bonneville and/or El Mirage Street Roadster Records

Offline MAZDA1807

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #289 on: December 06, 2010, 11:21:41 AM »
I love that noise!
80ci,264.7 RWHP, 19.2sq.ft. of frontal area, 175.611, NOTBAD

Offline maguromic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1736
    • http://www.barringtontea.com
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #290 on: December 06, 2010, 11:42:17 AM »
It's liable to get noisey out there.

Its not noise, its music.  Kind of like Beethovan's symphony #5.   8-) Tony
“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”

Offline Bob Drury

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2599
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #291 on: December 06, 2010, 12:08:29 PM »
  I may have posted this before, but in the seventies I was lucid enough to remember a guy from Portland named Terry Hoard, who drag raced  a car called the Samuri Warrior.
  What a horrendous noise, sort of like a nuclear washing machine run amouk with no bearings left.
 When he reved (or expanded or whatever the f--k those things do), dog's died, women became sterile, men more insane, and I left for Bonneville.
  I am afraid if that motor was brought to Bonneville that a giant chasm might open up and swallow all the fuel burning roadsters for life!!!
  Only ear doctors and hearing aid specialists will benifit from allowing these monsters to drown out the memories of Chauvin or Leggit warming up.
  May God save us...................................... :roll:  Bob
Bob Drury

Offline Cajun Kid

  • Rajun Cajun Racing E/CGALT 5690
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
  • Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #292 on: December 06, 2010, 12:12:23 PM »
I agree with Bob D,,,  there is no joy in hearing a rotary rev up... nothing compares to the lope of a V8...

Those Rotary engines may be fast and rev to the moon, but they sure do hurt the ears... :evil: :evil:

But run'em if'n you got'em.

Charles
ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
B/CGALT, C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder and 200 Club Member
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, C/CGALT,   E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  203.343mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 196.967mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 213.624mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Loring 204.109mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com

Offline Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13169
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #293 on: December 06, 2010, 01:07:49 PM »
Way back when I had a Mazda RX4 -- the four door sedan.  I remember showing how smooth was the engine - to a buddy.  I'd have it in "park", open the hood, and have him hold onto the hood at the far front end -- farthest away from the mounting hinges.  I'd rev it to 7 grand -- and he would be amazed that there wasn't any vibration anywhere along the 0 - 7,000 curve.  The car, for a four door family grocery getter, was quite spritely, too.  Ah, those were the days, hey?
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline MAZDA1807

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #294 on: December 06, 2010, 01:53:19 PM »
Maybe I could move exhaust to the driverside for everyone in the pits to hear, nope they will still hear me coming down the track!
80ci,264.7 RWHP, 19.2sq.ft. of frontal area, 175.611, NOTBAD

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #295 on: December 06, 2010, 05:39:47 PM »
I'd always heard that the incentive to drive a rotary fast was to outrun the damned noise.

"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Plan B

  • Guest
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #296 on: December 06, 2010, 06:08:21 PM »
Owned a couple of Mazdas in the mid-seventies. RX-3 coupe and an RX-4 wagon.
Driving one was kind of like a Buick GNX. Not much noise or drama for a few seconds, then all of a sudden you were going really fast.
Horsepower graph was dramatic and peaked at a high RPM.
They came with an over-rev buzzer that was set at 6 or 7 grand, something like that.
Talking racers, I learned that the object was not to avoid the buzzer, but to keep it ON! That kept the engine in the narrow power band.
If it goes off ... add more throttle or downshift!

I'm not a big fan of the typical belly-button Pacific rim cars but the rotary does have a certain appeal.

Now back to the original, seriously high-jacked thread.

DonS

Offline Glen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7024
  • SCTA/BNI timer 1983 to 2004, Retired,. Crew on Tur
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #297 on: December 06, 2010, 06:45:18 PM »
Ask the starters what they think of the noisy little ear drum breaking POS.
Glen
Crew on Turbinator II

South West, Utah

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8973
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #298 on: December 06, 2010, 07:16:46 PM »
I think Marlo had one in the lakester back in the Monastery bus days, with a blower that was larger than the motor  :-o
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline Nortonist 592

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
    • http://www.artfv.com/design/fashion/
Re: new 2011 rule changes
« Reply #299 on: December 07, 2010, 01:47:47 AM »
Maybe I could move exhaust to the driverside for everyone in the pits to hear, nope they will still hear me coming down the track!

Maybe they could move the exhaust into the drivers compartment.  That would get rid of roatarys even quicker!!!!
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.