I voted no.
I am not sure I should even vote since I am one of those fringe people who enjoy the hell out of Bonneville and it's history but have never made a pass, helped with the course or done anything at Bonneville except have the time of my life. I have been helping out on a car for the last 10 years but am not a member of SCTA or BNI. Why... I'm not sure.
My vote is one of protection than anything else. There are people out there that have no business knowing what SCTA/BNI is doing. If they want that information they need to participate. If the information is readily available at meetings and through clubs then they should go and get a copy, or ask someone to share. But just because it is "public information" doesn't mean that it should be layed out on the internet. As convenient as the internet is for many things, there is much that should not be made available so readily. Why expose what you are doing, who you are doing it with and what it costs? Why would you want to expose internal discussions, some of which may be very touchy and unresolved, to people who do not have best interests of SCTA/BNI at heart.
Clubs are clubs, and virtually every club has the same internal issues. What drives a club farther off the centerline is when reasonable thinking people withdraw from a club because they don't like what is going on. That is exactly the time when you should be involved, if only on a minimal level. We all know this and have all seen it. Participation is key, which seems a little strange since I am not a member of either.
In my past research, when I have had a question about anything SCTA/BNI, the answer has always been graciously available to me after I have explained what I want the information for.
Concerning the airing of issues or board members understanding what the vast membership and spectators are interested in, maybe more of them can read these discussions, and combining that with a broader awareness of this site would be a good resource for all.