Author Topic: Another "production" class question  (Read 7462 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Frank06

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Another "production" class question
« on: November 16, 2009, 06:58:34 AM »
This is about brakes.  I searched but couldn't find much on this.  Are safety-oriented mods allowed?  For example, I have a 1971 Kawasaki H1 that is stock with the exception of an EX caliper, stainless steel brake lines and HH pads.  These mods don't do anything to make the bike go faster, but they allow braking that's closer to what one would find on a modern machine.

thanks
E-Racer

Offline Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13169
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2009, 08:34:12 AM »
Not in SCTA, that's for absolutely sure.  I asked Tom Evans, SCTA's chief motorcycle technician, and he unequivocally said that stainless steel brake lines were NOT allowed in production.  I expect that the ECTA rules would echo that sentiment.

I used the "increased safety while braking" line on Tom - to no avail.  Granted we were discussing a 2008-model bike, not a 1971 issue ride -- but I'd stick with factory  You might consider putting on fresh rubber lines (and other parts), though.

If an ECTA rule-maker would like to tell me that such mods WILL be okay in ECTA -- please go ahead and do so.  In the meantime -- if I'm the inspector on your bike and you ask me to approve stainless lines on your production bike - and you can't prove that they are factory stock -- I'll have to move you out of production class.

By the way -- the non-stock pads would be okay -- they're out of sight.  Such is permissible within the production rules.
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline RansomT

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 559
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2009, 09:05:29 AM »
I'm going to stick my neck out on this one ...

While I am NO means official, in anyway ... My suggestion would be to contact Todd Doss, Chief Motorcycle Tech, well ahead of time of an ECTA event with an explanation of the safety "improvement" and photos.  He "may" grant you a waiver.

Jon brings a very invaluable lesson to the table .... When in Production Class (PP), anything you see MUST be OEM or good enough that it wouldn't be questioned.  Otherwise, short of a waiver in hand, it ain't going to fly.

Offline White Monster

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 269
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2009, 09:40:50 AM »
My suggestion would be to contact Todd Doss, Chief Motorcycle Tech

Todd Dross, username narider on this site.
 :wink:
Be safe, go fast, have FUN !

Offline Frank06

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2009, 12:59:34 PM »
Thanks for the comments folks.  I was hoping Todd might chime in but I'll PM him directly.
E-Racer

Offline LSR Mike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 538
  • First Pass-June 25, 2000; Muroc Dry Lake
    • Mike & Paula's Site
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2009, 01:16:09 PM »
Well, the issue "shouldn't" come up unless you set a record, then you would be scrutinized for class conformance, at a SCTA or BNI event. At the ECTA event's this step is virtual, i.e. it's up to you to be honest; nobody looks at you except the other guy's in your class when you set a record.
Mike M.
BNI/ECTA
ECTA Record Holder/Former Bonneville Record Holder

Offline Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13169
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2009, 01:20:53 PM »
Well, Mike -- not quite as much now as even eariler this year.  At the October meet we inspectors were asked to do a bit more rigorous inspection of bikes that were qualifying for records.  More than just checking gas tank seals -- although not engine teardowns. 

You're right in thinking that Todd is the guy to ask for definitive information.  He's probably not on the Forum much these days -- they've just moved (might still be moving) into a new house -- and he and Deb amd Josh and Amanda are busy with the unpacking.
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline wolcottjl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 289
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2009, 11:26:08 PM »
Not only moving but up to his ears in bikes that need repair.  His business seems to be doing very well.  Last I heard we were on call to help with the move on Saturday.  If I don't see anything on an answer by Saturday I will ask Todd for an answer.
Joel
Joel Wolcott
Moving to 2 wheels in 2010

Offline relaxedfit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2009, 07:31:58 PM »
Just a question here - no argument intended - but following a thread already discussed, if a pipe can be cut, gutted, rewelded and painted, why couldn't braided brake lines be painted with an acrylic paint within the same spirit of the rules?
Ken Presson
Having nothing to do in shutdown is our goal

Offline Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13169
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2009, 07:35:19 PM »
I don't know about painting the re-worked exhaust cannister.  I'd get a written ruling from the Chief on that before I tried it -- seriously.  As for the brake lines -- since this is land speed racing, not road racing (where brakes are used hard and frequently) -- it seems a non-necessary modification and therefore not justifiable under the guise of safety-related modifications (such as the required steering stabilser, for instance).
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline MiltonP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #10 on: November 21, 2009, 09:58:42 AM »
I would echo the comment on not needing upgraded brakes for our sport, on that bike's projected speeds at least.  I suppose the argument that could be made, not necessarily in your case, would be visible reduction of the weight of the hardware. 

As for the exhaust mods, all the visible dimensions, especially the rear opening are factory.  Internal mods, such as baffle mods, are allowed and were recommended to me by two of the techs.  Since they led me down that path, I would have been quite irritated if I couldn't work them back to passable.  My wallet would have appreciated leaving the welds visible.  Actually that whole effort had minimal value with the core of the motor being stock :-( 

As to painting, alot of folks are running production class with non-stock paint jobs; however, in this particular case, the black exhaust was offered by the factory and matches up with manual photos.

 :cheers:

Offline Cajun Kid

  • Rajun Cajun Racing E/CGALT 5690
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
  • Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2009, 10:07:27 AM »
Milt,, hows the truck coming ?  Keep us posted and take plenty of Pics !!!

Charles
ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
B/CGALT, C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder and 200 Club Member
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, C/CGALT,   E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  203.343mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 196.967mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 213.624mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Loring 204.109mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com

Offline Frank06

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #12 on: November 21, 2009, 10:24:25 AM »
Thanks again for the comments everyone.  My motivation in asking is simply to get a better handle on the rules and what's been accepted in the past.  I won't consider using the H1 in LSR as the stock brakes are crap and the EX caliper I use (with HH pads) makes a HUGE difference in braking ability for street riding.  It's a fun ride and I don't even want to consider swapping brakes back and forth.

T500 it is then!  :cheers:


E-Racer

Offline MiltonP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2009, 10:26:52 AM »
The initial work was just to improve it for daily/tow use.  I am starting to think the lowered control arms I ordered will never show up and i will have a battle with the vendor/middleman on my hands.  In the meantime I acquired a second motor for the bike and the funds that might have gone to the truck have been going into the engine instead.  As a result, the truck will likely see little work this season though it may get a test run or two.  Besides, it needs another 50k miles or so of wear and tear first.

I anticipate not going nuts with it until the 2012 season.  I'll be turning 50 later that year and can use that as an excuse!   I will definitely have to build or hitch a ride that goes 150 by then if I haven't accomplished that by that point in time.  I tend to have a 'mid-life crisis' every five years that can only be resolved by stimulated the motorsports economy!    :cheers:

Offline MiltonP

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
Re: Another "production" class question
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2009, 10:31:11 AM »
Frank06,  I would bring the H1 down and run it in whatever class they allow.  Then if it looks like it would have the production record consider making the change.  You should be able to get an assist on-site as well.