I'm with Stainless on this one. Most will buy a cheaper helmet next time and probably not take as good care of it. I thought that it was neat when the helmets were inspected the same time the cars were at Bonneville. This seems like the most efficient way to keep our equipment up to par.
Maybe they aren't making the helmets as good as they used to be!
Remember the polycarbonate helmets that had the tiny ridge cast into them? When that ridge disappeared, it was time to get a new helmet. My first helmet was one of those pudding bowl things that had cotton ear protectors that doubled for chin straps and the bowl was made from something that looked like wood chips and shellac.
I tested mine at least once a month in the SC desert. I got rid of it because it wasn't cool looking, not because it wasn't protecting. I got a fiberglass one in the '50's that I really liked and keep it into the 60's when the dog ate the insides out of it. I replaced it with one of the polycarbonate models. It lasted until I waxed it with a cleaner wax and the little ridge disappeared. It was probably still OK (I think they made bowling balls of the same material).
DanW. said the rules are written in blood and I don't think I've seen any rules that haven't been justified until maybe now. I think the head restraint is needed now more than anything else. I think a well taken care of modern helmet is good for at least 10 years for LSR use. I think the SCTA has done more for the LSR racers than anyone and if this is going to be the way it is, then so be it. Though it would be nice to know the reason behind this change in the rules
Respectively, Harvey