Thanks Gary,
Re:The forward edge rule, I have a hard time accepting that the intent is to apply to only the fairing, the simple sentence as printed is "There shall be no streamlining forward of the front edge of the Rim." so I don't see it as limited to fairings.
This is also two sentences after the sentence that says "no part of the fairing may be"....."forward of the front edge of the rim".
So I arrive at these conclusions;
1. In modified (M) open classes, a streamlining device also known as a front fender maybe used provided it complies with the provisions of 7.F.4.1, which is a specifically listed exemption to 7.F.11
2. In Special Construction (A) open classes, a streamlining front fender is not specifically listed as an allowed exemption. to correct this I would add 7.F.4.1 and 7.F.4.2 to 7.G.4, where 7.G.4 says to see 7.F.4, and does not specifically also call out 7.F.4.1 and 7.F.4.2, which is probably the intent.
3. In M and A, partial streamlined classes, (MPS & APS), streamlining forward of the front edge (by fender or fairing) of the rim is against rule, although does appear to be a commonly accepted practice.
This is just how I see it, as I read it, but the physical evidence says otherwise.
Maybe time to send a note to T. Evans?
Lloyd