Bob, I'd love to have them aboard, even if it was just a contact in the engineering department I could call and get advise about the K-series, or to source crank bearings, belts, oil rail - the stuff I won't be able to source stateside.
But then the question becomes, what do they get out of the deal?
MG's marketing focus is clearly on the new MG3 and MG6, and they're simply not trading on their history.
The truth is, if you include the Midget, it's a long history of record setting by the marque, going back to 1930. It's an elite group of manufacturers who can claim record setting cars over 84 years. On top of that, Great Britain has always had a larger fascination with record breaking cars than the US. One need look no farther than the Bloodhound project and the support they're receiving from Cosworth, Jaguar, Rolls Royce, Lucas, Rolex . . .
That's an angle I'm taking, but MG's current stature is one of a start-up, salvaged from Rover's demise, primarily going up against Honda, Nissan, Fiat, MINI and Toyota in their domestic market. Translating what I'm doing into sales of their MG3 and MG6 would require a degree of mental gymnastics few bean counters are willing to attempt.
On the other hand, the MG EX 135 chassis was a car purchased used by MG, and it was 15 years old before it ever turned a wheel on the salt.
I can make a compelling argument, but I don't know if I can make a persuasive one.
Yeah, the iron is warm - the question is, can I forge it into something that makes sense for both of us?