Author Topic: Milwaukee Midget  (Read 3275101 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4530 on: October 10, 2014, 09:30:45 PM »

On this thing, I simply don't think it will have the "forgiveness factor" of a cast iron 5-port tractor motor.

10 really long bolts - springs, as Sparky points out - sandwiching it all together.

I'm really going to have to be on my game this time.  I suspect my old friend, "Dumb Luck", will not be knocking on my door as often on this one.

I think you should fabricate a custom alternator bracket.

I'd start with two pieces of quite heavy plate, maybe inch. Have one cnc'd to fit over the head and the other a snug fit to bear on the lower skirt and use it as the sump attachment, then I'd connect them with at least 14 high tensile bolts of maybe 58dia. Then you can hang the alt off it somewhere......... :roll:

A month back, and he's STILL jet-lagged?   :|

By the way - MGC rocks on the rocks -

http://melbournegincompany.com/

They must have stripped every Juniper tree in Queensland to make it go.

Thanks for that!
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline Jack Gifford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4531 on: October 11, 2014, 12:58:23 AM »
... I'm not doing this one twice...
Isn't that what we all say? :roll:
M/T Pontiac hemi guru
F/BFL 1-mile Loring record 2020

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4532 on: October 11, 2014, 01:12:36 AM »
... I'm not doing this one twice...
Isn't that what we all say? :roll:

Yup . . .

Time and time again.

But THIS time, I'm going to stamp out and alleviate redundancy.  :cheers:
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4533 on: October 11, 2014, 01:13:39 AM »
... I'm not doing this one twice...
Isn't that what we all say? :roll:

Yup . . .

Time and time again.

But THIS time, I'm going to stamp out and alleviate redundancy.  :cheers:
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline FNQ

  • New folks
  • Posts: 6
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4534 on: October 11, 2014, 05:53:51 AM »
Forgive my ignorance but does the k series use metric??? was this from the collaboration from Honda or built in Europe or?  ... i am not sure if the midget will understand all this new fangledness

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4535 on: October 11, 2014, 03:30:48 PM »
Forgive my ignorance but does the k series use metric??? was this from the collaboration from Honda or built in Europe or?  ... i am not sure if the midget will understand all this new fangledness

There IS a K-series Honda engine - no relation to the MG/Rover engine, despite Rover's procurement of Honda engines for the Sterling line of cars in the late 1980's.  

The K series MG/Rover engine was a clean sheet of paper for Rover.  They were the original engine Lotus chose for the Elise, but because it doesn't have a knock sensor, they couldn't export them to the United States until Lotus started procuring engines from Toyota.

As to whether or not the MG will accept the Rover engine, it's a popular swap in Great Britain.  They also tend to wind up in a lot of Caterham 7s.

Yup - metric.       

Makes for a tidy install, I think . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylu3LO_PWJA
« Last Edit: October 11, 2014, 03:34:33 PM by Milwaukee Midget »
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline Dr Goggles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3120
  • The Jarman-Stewart "Spirit of Sunshine" Bellytank
    • "Australian Bellytank" , http://thespiritofsunshine.blogspot.com/
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4536 on: October 11, 2014, 06:19:55 PM »
... I'm not doing this one twice...
Isn't that what we all say? :roll:

Yup . . .

Time and time again.

But THIS time, I'm going to stamp out and alleviate redundancy.  :cheers:

.............and again.

Now, what with all this metricity, I'm wondering if you're going to go the full whack. Are you going to change the clocks? That way you can fit more hours into a day.

My dad would always make the point that since metric measurement was brought in he felt younger.

Thing is, metric is a great system but its almost always contaminated.............

OK, have at it. :evil: :evil: :evil:
Few understand what I'm trying to do but they vastly outnumber those who understand why...................

http://thespiritofsunshine.blogspot.com/

Current Australian E/GL record holder at 215.041mph

THE LUCKIEST MAN IN SLOW BUSINESS.

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4537 on: October 11, 2014, 08:30:19 PM »

Now, what with all this metricity, I'm wondering if you're going to go the full whack.


Doc, I'm racing an MG.  No matter how it's measured, there's little doubt I've gone the full whack.

Regarding time, I'm pushing for the 33 1/3 hour day.  That way, I'll be able to easily calculate the time by counting the grooves on "Dark Side of the Moon" and dividing it into 66,666.

Example -

"Time" (track 4) runs 233 revolutions on the turntable.  233/66,666 =.003495.

So according to my watch, it's .003495 later than when I started counting the revolutions on my stereo.

It's no less sensical than a yard being the distance between a king's nose and his thumb. 
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline Dr Goggles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3120
  • The Jarman-Stewart "Spirit of Sunshine" Bellytank
    • "Australian Bellytank" , http://thespiritofsunshine.blogspot.com/
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4538 on: October 11, 2014, 10:13:00 PM »
Some words for you to contemplate,

Metperial
Impetric.
Metworth
BSM
Whitric.
 :wink:

sorry I'm just in a generally annoying mood today.
Few understand what I'm trying to do but they vastly outnumber those who understand why...................

http://thespiritofsunshine.blogspot.com/

Current Australian E/GL record holder at 215.041mph

THE LUCKIEST MAN IN SLOW BUSINESS.

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4539 on: October 11, 2014, 11:26:32 PM »
Some words for you to contemplate,

Metperial
Impetric.
Metworth
BSM
Whitric.
 :wink:

sorry I'm just in a generally annoying mood today.


Always throwing a wrench into the works . . .

 :wink:

I own one Metperial open end . . .




Truth be told, I have very little experience with Metric sizing.  I find myself constantly grabbing the wrong socket or spanner.

And it's not like I haven't owned cars with metric sized bolts.  It's just that they've been - for the most part - a lot more reliable than the older American and Brit cars I've owned.

Experience being the best teacher . . .
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline Speed Limit 1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4540 on: October 11, 2014, 11:31:45 PM »
Some words for you to contemplate,

Metperial
Impetric.
Metworth
BSM
Whitric.
 :wink:

sorry I'm just in a generally annoying mood today.


domain-kb.com/www/metperial.com :-D
John Gowetski, red hat @ 221.183 MPH MSA Lakester, Bockscar #1000 60 ci normally aspirated w/N20

Offline salt27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4541 on: October 11, 2014, 11:53:21 PM »
sorry I'm just in a generally annoying mood today.


Generally annoying is not at all like you, usually you are very annoying.   :-D

I think this may be progress.   :cheers:

Offline fordboy628

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2342
  • GONE FISHIN' . . .
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4542 on: October 12, 2014, 09:34:28 AM »
sorry I'm just in a generally annoying mood today.


Generally annoying is not at all like you, usually you are very annoying.   :-D

I think this may be progress.   :cheers:

Perhaps a demotion from Generally annoying to Majorly annoying, might be in order? ?   :roll:
 :cheers:
annoyingboy
Science, NOT Magic . . . .

I used to be a people person.  But people changed that relationship.

"There is nothing permanent except change."    Heraclitus

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."     Albert Einstein

Offline Milwaukee Midget

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6663
    • Milwaukee Midget Racing
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4543 on: October 13, 2014, 12:07:25 AM »
Okay, I’ve mentioned the “Sandwich” construction of the K-series, but after cleaning up the gunk in the block and started putting 2 and 2 together, this kinda frightened me.
  
I sourced these two photos from MG-rover.org .  The spindly piece is the stock unit, which I have.  The other die casting is the “uprated” version.



If all it did was supply oil to the mains, that would be okay, but the 10 holes around the perimeter are the tapped holes for the head stud long bolts.  So essentially, the whole engine is held together by this piece and 10 “springs”.

Of course, I would want the heavier duty item of the two.  But ideally, I would prefer a steel piece.  My concern in fabricating a steel replacement is expansion rates and potential sheer and shifting.  But even this uprated oil ladder/girdle retainer looks – well, kinda cheap.

I know – relax – take a breath – all good advice.  Yes, die casting has come a long way, but I’m questioning everything this time – especially a threaded die casting intended to hold the whole engine together.  

« Last Edit: October 13, 2014, 12:09:21 AM by Milwaukee Midget »
"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:

Offline FNQ

  • New folks
  • Posts: 6
Re: Milwaukee Midget
« Reply #4544 on: October 13, 2014, 04:23:37 AM »
The original ladder does look a tad flimsy doesn't it... but so long as you don't plan on detonation  i am sure the uprated unit will go the relatively short distance. at 9000rpm or thereabouts.

now  that mg install looks the ducks.....  were they 4 amals?    thanks for the honda K info....
what about metric obsfucation... the hiding of metric threads in english body work... now what crank tap will you have to use... multiply by 12 and divide by Tuesday.... loving the detailed strip down .. keep the info coming.... any of those ladder studs prestretched coming out?