Author Topic: Lakster frame structures  (Read 2582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PJQ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
  • South end, Land of Oz
Lakster frame structures
« on: November 22, 2007, 07:23:07 PM »
G'day,

Around the pits these are the structures you find most often for main sections of frame (I realise there are variations and things change at the ends of the car).
 
I'm curious about  the pros and cons of each, with safety as a priority, and whether one stands out over the others.

Regards,
PJQ
Velocity Science Laboratories

Offline 1212FBGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
    • http://www.motobody.com
Re: Lakster frame structures
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2007, 01:09:45 AM »
"A" can still collaps and flex... "B" and "D" are strong but heavy "B" being the strongest of those 2... "C" is my choice...
kent

Offline Unkl Ian

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
Re: Lakster frame structures
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2007, 02:01:17 AM »
The idea is that the diagonals are strongest loaded in tension.
So if you know which direction the loads are coming from,you can design to suit.

Sometimes a space frame will be made not as strong as possible,
on the ends,to absorb energy in a crash.The closer the structure
gets to the driver,the stronger it gets.Progressive stiffenss.

In a serious crash,the car will bend.If it bends a little more
in the right places,it can save the driver from injury or death.
Bending too much in the wrong place,only makes the situation worse.


Other people just build everything heavy,
rather than understanding what is really needed.
I guess the answer is "a Secret" .