Author Topic: Alternative fuel racers  (Read 4969 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bak189

  • Guest
Alternative fuel racers
« on: July 01, 2007, 12:54:31 PM »
HOW TIMES CHANGE!!!!!!!!!.........................................
In my earlier live I was involved in developing and designing
vehicles to run on CNG.....................I thought it would be a great to race one of our LSR sidecars on CNG.......the sidecar platform could hold the tank.............checked with the officials..........ABSOLUTELY NO WAY, NOT SAFE!!!!!!!
HOW TIMES CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!........................................
(may try it again...who knows)

Offline sockjohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2007, 03:47:43 PM »
HOW TIMES CHANGE!!!!!!!!!.........................................
In my earlier live I was involved in developing and designing
vehicles to run on CNG.....................I thought it would be a great to race one of our LSR sidecars on CNG.......the sidecar platform could hold the tank.............checked with the officials..........ABSOLUTELY NO WAY, NOT SAFE!!!!!!!
HOW TIMES CHANGE!!!!!!!!!!........................................
(may try it again...who knows)

Did they go into why they thought it was unsafe?

I've seen pictures of CNG powered trucks hit by a train, the CNG tank was the only thing recognizable after the fact.

A gas that gets blown away quickly seems safer than a liquid fuel that will puddle. I don't have any real experience with it, but lots of offroad rock crawlers use it for this reason.  Getting upside down and leaking fuel everywhere is bad!


Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2007, 04:30:12 PM »
I hope it wasn't me. :roll:
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

bak189

  • Guest
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2007, 05:15:37 PM »
NO, Jack is was not you!!!!! I don't want publish any names of the old and dead...............................
CNG is compressed natural gas in a high pressure
tank ...... like a welding cyl. The gas is  approx. at 2000 PSI. it is controlled by two regulators (1 high......1 low) The only danger is if the valve were to break off..... the cyl. would "fly away"........ if not properly mounted.  The gas would not burn or explode.........................................................................
it is safer than petrol (gasoline) and it has a approx. octane of 120......it makes great horsepower in a high comp. engine.
LNG is natural gas in liquid form and can be dangerous  .......the LSR streamliner Blue Flame used LNG for it's power...............

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2007, 06:35:26 PM »
This is where I could say stuff about the "Old and Dead"  we still have around, but I am so shy. :roll:
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline 1212FBGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
    • http://www.motobody.com
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2007, 01:43:25 AM »
bak
you mean you wanted to use a cylinder like a nitrogen tank(1800psi) like so many other people use? or maybe like a NOS tank (900psi)hummmm i wonder.... whats the difference? were you turned down recently?
kent

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2007, 01:53:30 AM »
There Ya go Kent, stirring the pot !  LOL :wink:
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline Greyboy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 50
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2007, 02:01:38 AM »

Hydrogen seems to be safer than liquid fuels; in a rupture it dissipates quickly (into the atmosphere); and apparently it was not the cause of the Hindenburg disaster.. the flames were red-orange, not the blue of hydrogen burning. Seems safe enough to strap a big ol' tank of that to your sidecar and going for broke...

Robin UK

  • Guest
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2007, 07:49:53 AM »
Blue Flame did use LNG but only as the minor part of a bi-propellant mix. Hydrogen peroxide was the main fuel. If you read any stories - and there are plenty - about BF only using H202 with no LNG added, ignore them. Dick Keller confirms that all runs were in bi-propellant mode, albeit severely "detuned" because of some on-site engine repairs carried out early in their campaign. They took the record using only 13,000lbs thrust, less that half of what they'd planned.

As an aside, they used 5 tires, the only damage coming when Gabelich flat spotted one braking in the pits!! Goodyear reclaimed the tires and fitted the car with show tires which it rolls on to this day.

Robin

bak189

  • Guest
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2007, 10:19:48 AM »
Question to Robin and/or Pork Pie.....the last time I saw the Blue Flame was in a museum in Germany
is it there?
Kent, regarding running our sidecars on CNG.........
no not todate.....asked back in the 1980's.............
Maybe SCTA/BNI is now more "enlightened"
(it's O.K. for BUB)

Offline PorkPie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2046
  • think fast.....always
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #10 on: July 02, 2007, 01:31:07 PM »
Question to Robin and/or Pork Pie.....the last time I saw the Blue Flame was in a museum in Germany
is it there?
Kent, regarding running our sidecars on CNG.........
no not todate.....asked back in the 1980's.............
Maybe SCTA/BNI is now more "enlightened"
(it's O.K. for BUB)
The Blue Flame is owned by the Technik Museum in Sinsheim - about 20 miles north west of Hockenheim - the race course. It was rent for some daysthis year to the World of Speed exhibition in Goodwood.
Pork Pie

Photoartist & Historian & 200 MPH Club Member (I/GL 202.8 mph in the orig. Bockscar #1000)

Offline 1212FBGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
    • http://www.motobody.com
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #11 on: July 02, 2007, 01:36:06 PM »
bak
if ya build a really good guard to protect the head i really think they would be cool with it. fuel class of course. ya want me to build one for ya?
kent

Online Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13174
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2007, 02:21:37 PM »
I've got a pair of CNG tanks still in my '89 Jimmy -- from when I could get CNG at the local station on which to run the vehicle.  3,600 psi was what the gauge showed when the tanks were full.  I don't know the composition of the tanks -- but the top layer is a wound-fabric of some sort.  Somebody want 'em?  They're available if you do, although you'll have to ask really nicely to have me go through the contortions to get 'em out of their mounts.
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8985
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2007, 03:21:54 PM »
Yea, the same group declared hydrogen illegal for many years after Ben Jordan ran the Zagato on it in 1981.  He sponsored a trophy for the fastest hydrogen vehicle, won a couple of times by Middle Tennessee U if I remember right, then the Hindenburg scenario evolved in the smaller minds of SoCal...  :|
(sorry, did I write that down)
 :roll:
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: Alternative fuel racers
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2007, 05:57:28 PM »
Their thoughts began and ended at the sight of a huge sack of burning Hydrogen hanging over a cocktail party.
The confusion about the color of the flame fails to include the other materials that were also burning at the same time.
Various colors of fireworks come to mind. :wink:

OBTW:
I always suspected Stainless was a Charm School Dropout. LOL
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"