Author Topic: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final  (Read 3772 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

landracing

  • Guest
2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« on: January 11, 2007, 05:16:22 PM »
Here is the final versions of the rule changes posted on website.

http://landracing.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28

Jon



Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2007, 04:31:28 PM »
" The beatings will continue until moral improves."
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Online Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13169
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2007, 04:54:27 PM »
Jack, nothing you're likely to do will improve my morals. 
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline donpearsall

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 873
    • http://soundappraisal.com
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2007, 12:21:11 AM »
It looks like just about all bikes will have to fabricate new chainguards. Steel has to be 3/32" and aluminum 1/8". That is quite thick sheet metal! What was the problem that prompted this? Virtually all stock chainguards are plastic so the factory lawyers must think that is sufficient to prevent injury. Get out your sheet metal brakes.

Don
550 hp 2003 Suzuki Hayabusa Land Speed Racer

Offline Nortonist 592

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
    • http://www.artfv.com/design/fashion/
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2007, 12:43:48 AM »
Most problems are percieved.   Current (and not so current) Jap bikes don't have primary chains.  Haven't had them for years so where the danger of flying primary chains came from is beyond me.  I lost a primary at the May El Mirage meet.  It slinked off like a BSA owner.  Contained admirably by a fiberglass cover.  Unfortunately copped by Tom or else it would still be on there.
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2007, 02:08:06 AM »
The stock plastic guard is not only for light weight but the material is designed to absorb the possible shock of a broken chain and deflect it away from the rider.
 It is really pretty good..
A home fabricated device might meet the material and dimensions required but in the event of a failure provide additional injury potential.
A fried and broken chain happens rarely but can be a real source of injury if it is not deflected away from the vital parts of both the rider and the machine.
Proper maintenance of the chain is more important than protection from it.
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline RidgeRunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 843
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2007, 08:52:25 AM »
Nortonist

     Re: "slinked off like a BSA owner"

     Dunno about the left coast but over here on the ridge it's "Bast--d's Still Around"  :-D   They are all good when they are runnin' right, not worth much when they aren't :wink:   I agree with you on many problems being perceived.  Too much gets studied to death needlessly  :-)

Offline Nortonist 592

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
    • http://www.artfv.com/design/fashion/
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2007, 04:13:46 PM »
Sorry RidgeRunner.  First bike was a BSA.  Nearly put me off bikes.  Anyway I was told by my Dad that BSA stood for Bring Spares Along.
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.

Offline RidgeRunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 843
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2007, 12:24:12 AM »
Sorry RidgeRunner.  First bike was a BSA.  Nearly put me off bikes.  Anyway I was told by my Dad that BSA stood for Bring Spares Along.

     No problem here. :-)   

     Last definition sorta goes with another "B--tard Stopped Again".

     Over the years I, and those I have ridden with, have had all the variations occur regardless of the badge on the tank.

Offline hawkwind

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: 2007 Car and Motorcycle Rule Changes Final
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2007, 12:56:06 AM »
My most memorable culprits (2)  an old iron head sportster and a ducati 860 ,the sporty's mechanical falibility was ledgendary and the duke's electrics made lord lucas look good ,both were not missed  :lol: they were the first and last of that make I purchased ,as for the rice ,never had a lemon yet  :-)
Gary
slower than most