The method that Scott mentions might work for them bur won't work for El Mirage.
Does anybody want to verify the total legality of 100+ entries on a Sunday after noon?
Do a proper inspection up front with the entrant following along at every detail.
It is kinda of a "Trust but verify" type of deal. If the entrant is confident in the inspection soon you will find them anxious to show you everything that is a product of all their hard work.
The same treatment for everybody will keep the cheaters at bay and both sides know the rules are simple and clear enough that everybody is watching with the same information.
As for local policy and Club representation, the meets at El Mirage have a system that works for them at El Mirage and is now better that something else that might work at Maxton.
Bonneville tries to run under the same rules but is touted as a "World Class" event and the entrants deserve a little different treatment.
Look how lucky everybody was with the handling of the GT deal. Sure he got busted for problems at El Mirage, the good part you are wondering about is the mistakes are far less likely to happen again.
As much as some don't like it, this communication network worked very well to identify the problem and educate a lot of people on how to avoid it in the future.
The "Screw him he lives in Colorado", plan won't fly any longer or farther that your broken foot.
Hey wait!! Isn't he a ROD RIDER anyway ? SCREW HIM !!!