What a strange rule?
Running some numbers on it, it basically gives you a 1-3% tolerance for engine displacement based on engine configuration. And as much as a 5% for a weird engine configuration like a 50cc four cylinder with a Stroke that?s twice the Bore?
If I interpret it correctly, for my engine with a 3.5? bore and a 3.125? stroke we get:
For production I can bore the motor to 3.5258? (3.500?+.0258?) and stay legal for production at 500cc.
3.5258?^2*3.125*pi/4 = 499.75cc
Since I can?t find a +.025? piston, I can go with a +.015? or +.020? piston that?s commonly available and be under 500CC and still OK for Production.
Conceivably, I can then bore the motor .020? more than 3.5258? and be within 500cc altered or modified rules (but not Production).
3.5458?^2*3.125*pi/4 = 505.68 cc
Which gives me a 1.14% increase over 500cc. Of course, finding a +.0458? piston is again going to be impossible without getting some made, so I?d have to settle for a commonly available +.030 piston which will give me a 501cc engine.
The 501cc engine will be legal for 500cc A or M, but here is where I?m confused. Is it illegal for 650 because it?s not over the maximum for 500 for this particular engine configuration?? My brain says It?s illegal for 650 in this configuration (I?d need to get a piston bigger than 3.5458?), but my gut?s telling me that I?d get away with it.
I also wonder how much of a hassle it?s going to be trying to explain why a +.030? engine is legal under the +.020? rule, but I digress?