It looks like if you stood this one on end the driver could be the first privateer into space?
Thanks to Larry and also Kiwi Sid (via pm) for taking the time to answer some of my questions, and educate me better. I still have a lot to learn in all aspects of LSR.
These are just my personal opinions, naive as they may be. (please don't shoot me in the torso, or the head):
A chute is designed to decelerate a vehicle or person or thing, and assist it-them to a safe and hopefully graceful conclusion to a journey. If a chute is unsettling a vehicle it isn't doing it's job, and is potentially causing problems (accidents) not preventing them.
In skydiving we liked to load our chutes as they gave us more control, the chutes were then less affected by wind gusts thermal activity etc. A lightly loaded ram-air parachute (large square footage in relation to suspended weight) will be easily affected by the fore mentioned environment variables, and collapse, or be ravaged by the forces of nature. That is why students are only allowed to jump in moderate conditions.
Sid offered me some really valuable real-world insights into the vehicles that travel at the upper envelope speed. People have died because their vehicles couldn't be stopped. What I'm hearing is that the slower vehicles are getting into trouble because the parachute is doing too much? The chute should assist and not detract from a vehicles journey, and my opinion in relation to sport skydiving and base jumping has always been that one incident is one too many.
As I said to Sid, I have a great book (albeit pretty much unread) pertaining to this subject of parachute recovery systems... It's called Parachute recovery Systems, by T.W. Knacke. (lol).
I'm reading it now and I'm sure the maths is in there to calculate what a vehicle needs. I would advise any of you interested to buy it from my old supplier: http://www.paragear.com/templates/parachute.asp?group=23
The parachute manual by Dan Poynter is also considered the bible in terms of reference.
I'm sure contained within there is a more scientific way of determining what sort and size chute is applicable for each application. For example starting on page 5-3 there is a table pertaining to Parachute type in relation to shape, opening force, average angle of oscillation, drag coef.
Attached at the bottom, is a shot of the page I just mentioned. The book is all about the physics and maths.
I personally think that a combination of this type of information, coupled with empirical real world experience and expertise from the LSR community, you will be able to eliminate many of the problems that have been described here and elsewhere. Suppliers generally mean the best, but they often don't really know what you need, I've always felt responsibility for your own safety is your own. (I've survived many a thousand deployment).
My gut feeling is that you are over-chuting (sq area) in the lower speed classes, and this is what is causing problems to a great degree. If deployment of your chute is not something you look forward to, go smaller?
Higher speed vehicles I'm interested in hearing more about, as I think this is perhaps another world? Cheers.