Landracing Forum

Loring Timing Association (Maine) => Loring (AFB) land speed venue => Topic started by: Pumpkin on August 02, 2010, 06:14:32 PM

Title: Results?
Post by: Pumpkin on August 02, 2010, 06:14:32 PM
When might we see them?
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on August 02, 2010, 07:26:00 PM
 They havn't got home yet, give them a few days.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Pumpkin on August 03, 2010, 05:27:23 AM
Gotcha, thanks.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 61corvette on August 08, 2010, 07:17:48 AM
will they be posted on the lta-lsr website or on the ecta website?
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: DahMurf on August 08, 2010, 07:43:12 AM
They'll be posted on the LTA site. It's a manual process as they haven't set it up electronically like the other venues so I imagine it will take a little while to validate, type & post.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 61corvette on August 18, 2010, 04:43:04 PM
any ideas if/when the results will be posted? thanks
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Joe Timney on August 18, 2010, 04:52:22 PM
Donna is almost done cross checked them. Expect to see results sometime next week.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 61corvette on August 19, 2010, 06:50:13 AM
super! and thank you to whoever had to do all the work!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: sabat on August 19, 2010, 09:03:57 AM
Thanks again to the Timneys, and all the LTA folks for their continuing effort. -Dean
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on August 30, 2010, 09:47:34 PM
I've been to the LTA website and noticed that there is no data on the speeds from this years event, does anybody know if there were any G/GSS cars running this year and if so, how much they went over my 2009 record?

I might be back in 2012 but next year my plans are to use my limited (Social Security) travel funds to run Bonneville rather than Loring, it's on my Bucket List. If we can get the Wabbit fixed in time I'll run the October Maxton event.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Cajun Kid on August 30, 2010, 09:56:27 PM
John,

I think your Loring record is intact. I did not see any G/GSS at the event, there may have been one but if so I missed it.

Hope to see you at Maxton in October

Charles

Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on August 30, 2010, 10:42:50 PM
  
I've been to the LTA website and noticed that there is no data on the speeds from this years event, does anybody know if there were any G/GSS cars running this year and if so, how much they went over my 2009 record?

I might be back in 2012 but next year my plans are to use my limited (Social Security) travel funds to run Bonneville rather than Loring, it's on my Bucket List. If we can get the Wabbit fixed in time I'll run the October Maxton event.

 There may have been one. But, I believe your record is safe. I may see you at Bonneville next year.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on August 31, 2010, 12:07:56 AM
 
I've been to the LTA website and noticed that there is no data on the speeds from this years event, does anybody know if there were any G/GSS cars running this year and if so, how much they went over my 2009 record?

I might be back in 2012 but next year my plans are to use my limited (Social Security) travel funds to run Bonneville rather than Loring, it's on my Bucket List. If we can get the Wabbit fixed in time I'll run the October Maxton event.

 There may have been one. But, I believe your record is safe. I may see you at Bonneville next year.


I am going to have to work my schedule around two reunions that I will be attending and it looks like I will only be able to make the last Bonneville race in the year, I think it will most likely be in early October, correct me if I'm wrong. I was stationed at Hill AFB near Ogden back in the early 60's and that time of the year can be very beautiful and I plan on doing some motorcycle riding in the Wasatch mountains while I'm there.

Charles, I'm looking forward to seeing your Stude, I had a similar model when I was at Hill AFB......................Back In The Day(http://www.scsportscar.com/uploads/smil40096d8d6ddf5.gif)
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 61corvette on September 12, 2010, 07:32:52 PM
1305 views, i guess im not the only one who wants to see the results....
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: wrongway on September 13, 2010, 11:50:01 PM
I have been checking a couple times each week....

Roy
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: nemesis on September 14, 2010, 11:50:03 AM
Maybe peopel need to get on Bob's A to get it done, or maybe his abacus is broken.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: redhotracing on September 14, 2010, 12:16:08 PM
I've been checking on a nearly daily basis as well...
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on September 14, 2010, 06:43:53 PM

Donna is almost done cross checked them. Expect to see results sometime next week.



  It took a while last year, should be soon. :roll:
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: saltwheels262 on September 14, 2010, 06:53:43 PM
results aren't going to change.

it's a lot of work.

franey
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Seldom Seen Slim on September 14, 2010, 08:08:05 PM
I'll chime in here with a howdy -- and my guess that once the results are ready to be posted -- they will be.  Like Franey said, the results aren't going to change.  Bob, feel free to let me know if I can help by putting them on this site. 
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 61corvette on September 14, 2010, 10:45:23 PM
we know they are not going to change, but some of us only stayed for sat. we just want to know if our records got broken.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Nosgsx1300 on September 19, 2010, 03:29:49 PM
I am more curious when my license will show up in the mail :mrgreen:
After I was done I went to get my licence
I was told the were out of them and someone took down my name
they were supposed to send them out

I would hate to have to go thru the licensing process again next year

still THE BEST LANDSPEED EVENT I HAVE BEEN TO

but I am such a rookie
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 55chevr on September 19, 2010, 04:17:36 PM
You dont need the document ... there is a record of your fast pass ... just produce your time slip ...

Joe
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Nosgsx1300 on September 19, 2010, 05:16:17 PM
cool thanks

I wasn't too worried
it is really something I like to show off :-D
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Joe Timney on September 20, 2010, 07:21:37 AM
Calm down boys and girls...Donna finished the records 3 weeks ago...website issues have kept them from being published. Many things make it hard to complete these tasks...your handwriting is one of them. If you were to take the same attention to detail as you put into your race vehicle and apply it to filling out a race form, it would make life sooooo much easier.

Here they are so you can review them before Donna starts doing your record certificates.
Cars:
9232   Luke Kohler   Red Hot Racing   C/BFALT   201.252
260   Ed Brace   Brace's Greenhouse   D/BFRMR   153.570
850   Frank Waddell   Waddell Bros. Underdog   C/GRS   206.469
1034   Rodney W. King   Sam Sampson Coupe   C/GCC   151.645
1946   Steve Van Blarcom   VanBlarcom & Gilmore Racing   D/BGR   182.681
1223   Paul Calaguiro   Calaguiro Bros. Racing, Inc   F/CGC   123.177
9270   Andrew Nelson   PACC Racing   C/CGC   177.675
9410   Dave Cover   Dave Cover Racing   III/E   94.338
9388   Barry D. Roy   Barry D. Roy Racing   XF/GCT   94.175
9780   Ted Gramlich   Ted's Performance   G/BGSS   149.221
9411   Ross Merrill   Ross Merrill Racing   AA/GSS   126.209
9250   Bob Hemmenway   Lynn Racing   D/FCT   169.201
462   Keith Turk   So-Al Racing   AA/CBGC   205.198
805   Charles Venable   Venable Rods and Racing   E/CGALT   152.116
729   Dick Jurkowski   Dick and Gail Jurkowski   A/GC   200.919
863   Lawson F. Bilhardt   Black Bird SC   E/BGC   127.641
306   Gary Gustafson   Gustafson Racing   B/GMS   184.177
9338   Mike Largesse   Fair Warning Racing   B/PRO   158.213
1946   Steve Van Blarcom   VanBlarcom & Gilmore Racing   D/BGR   211.675
8150   Ron SanGiovanni   Ron SanGiovanni Racing   XF/BGL   115.618
9270   Andrew Nelson   PACC Racing   C/CBGC   176.442
1034   Rodney W. King   Sam Sampson Coupe   C/GCC   162.328
6222   Peter Calaguiro   PLT Performance, Inc   C/GSS   170.273
9492   John Ciancitto   Streamline Bros   B/CGALT   185.639
9388   Barry D. Roy   Barry D. Roy Racing   XF/FCT   93.093
9373   Andrew Murray   Andrew Murray Racing   C/GL   164.054
9456   Bob Self   Half Fast Racing   AA/BGC   218.113
9411   Ross Merrill   Ross Merrill Racing   AA/GSS   137.375
462   David Freiburger   So-Al Racing   AA/CBFALT   213.457
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   129.393
850   Larry Waddell   Waddell Bros. Underdog   B/GRS   210.285
9276   Kyle Dobbins   Chris Dobbins Racing   G/PS   150.748
9434   Parker Tompkins   Parker Tompkins Racing   C/PRO   113.352
9250   Bob Hemmenway   Lynn Racing   D/GCT   124.438
9438   Philip Steenstra   Jerry's Hardware Spl.   F/PMP   104.945
805   Charles Venable   Venable Rods and Racing   E/CGALT   163.277
531   Doug Kenny   Doug Kenny Racing   C/STR   202.963
6222   Peter Calaguiro   PLT Performance, Inc   C/GSS   172.175
9435   Phillip Reid   Reid Racing   I/FSS   89.311
9373   Andrew Murray   Andrew Murray Racing   C/GL   177.420
9338   Mike Largesse   Fair Warning Racing   B/PRO   160.387
260   Ed Brace   Brace's Greenhouse   D/BFRMR   160.852
9780   Ted Gramlich   Ted's Performance   G/BGSS   150.258
9411   Ross Merrill   Ross Merrill Racing   A/GSS   137.568
9339   Bob Jepson   Bob Jepson Racing   F/BSTR   122.933
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.548
9796   Michael Roman   Wounded Warriors Project   J/BGL   166.011
9410   Dave Cover   Dave Cover Racing   III/E   94.389
1223   Paul Calaguiro   Calaguiro Bros. Racing, Inc   F/CGC   135.313
9434   Parker Tompkins   Parker Tompkins Racing   C/PRO   124.760
9250   Bob Hemmenway   Lynn Racing   D/GCT   171.706
9063   Andrew DiMartino   DiMartino Fabrication   F/BFMS   174.131
1946   Ron SanGiovanni, Jr.   VanBlarcom & Gilmore Racing   A/BFR   151.255
9388   Barry D. Roy   Barry D. Roy Racing   XF/FCT   97.401
531   Doug Kenny   Doug Kenny Racing   C/STR   205.245
9276   Chris Dobbins   Chris Dobbins Racing   G/BFALT   128.168
9778   Jason Theriault   Jason Theriault   F/BMMP   123.655
9338   Mike Largesse   Fair Warning Racing   B/PRO   164.768
462   Tonya Turk   So-Al Racing   AA/CBGALT   208.097
9438   Philip Steenstra   Jerry's Hardware Spl.   F/PMP   105.638
9456   Bob Self   Half Fast Racing   A/BGC   215.723
9270   Andrew Nelson   PACC Racing   C/CGALT   178.702
9321   George Brockman   George Brockman Racing   A/GCT   168.558
850   Larry Waddell   Waddell Bros. Underdog   C/FRS   159.951
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.625
9063   Andrew DiMartino   DiMartino Fabrication   F/BFMS   178.013
1946   Ron SanGiovanni, Jr.   VanBlarcom & Gilmore Racing   A/BFR   185.563
9388   Barry D. Roy   Barry D. Roy Racing   XF/GCT   97.737
9410   Dave Cover   Dave Cover Racing   III/E   95.284
9270   Andrew Nelson   PACC Racing   AA/CGC   108.145
9456   Bob Self   Half Fast Racing   B/BGC   205.634
802   Charles Venable   Venable Rods and Racing   E/CFALT   175.250
9408   Jacob Barto   Risky Business   E/PS   125.158
531   Doug Kenny   Doug Kenny Racing   C/STR   206.896
1946   Ron SanGiovanni, Jr.   VanBlarcom & Gilmore Racing   A/BFR   208.690
9456   Andrew Krauss   Half Fast Racing   C/BGC   211.759
343   Mark Sotomayor   Mark Sotomayor Racing   E/BFSS   179.093
253   Steve DiMartino   Jesse's Girl   G/GL   171.601
9063   Andrew DiMartino   DiMartino Fabrication   F/BFMS   182.466
9276   Chris Dobbins   Chris Dobbins Racing   G/BFALT   147.984
9373   Andrew Murray   Andrew Murray Racing   C/GL   180.385
531   Doug Kenny   Doug Kenny Racing   C/STR   210.358
9456   David Rudan, Jr   Half Fast Racing   C/BGT   217.517
1223   Paul Calaguiro   Calaguiro Bros. Racing, Inc   F/CGC   137.019
9492   John Ciancitto   Streamline Bros   B/CFALT   200.834
7100   Gary Beineke   Gary Beineke   AA/GCT   208.478
9408   Jacob Barto   Risky Business   E/PS   134.216
Motorcycles:
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/G-1000/4   198.587
9393   James Silk, Jr   Tryitagain   M/G-1350/4   125.437
9465   Roy Brooks   Brooks Racing   M/F-1650/4   195.503
5112   Bill Warner   Warner/Forstall Racing   MPS/BF-1350/4   273.356
9102   Milton Paul   MP Racing   P/P-500/4   124.944
9221   Bradley Everhart   Bradley Everhart Racing   APS/BF-2000/4   197.044
9421   C T Schaefer   PRT Racing   P/PP-650/4   110.714
9389   Tom Crompton   Krypton Racing   MPS/G-175/4   65.696
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PG-350/4   72.49
1111   Todd Dross   Scott Guthrie Racing   SC/F-1350/4   176.470
9125   Brian Haenlein   Brian Haenlein Racing   M/VF-1350/4   96.074
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BG-1350/4   241.260
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/G-1000/4   202.110
9465   Roy Brooks   Brooks Racing   M/F-1650/4   196.215
9393   James Silk, Jr   Tryitagain   M/G-1350/4   144.260
9173   Richard Lorenson   Richard Lorenson Racing   P/P-250/4   103.880
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BG-1650/4   242.548
1111   Todd Dross   Scott Guthrie Racing   SC/F-1650/4   175.411
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PG-400/4   76.052
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/F-1000/4   195.511
1107   Josh Owen   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BF-1650/4   218.314
9383   Eric Paquette   Eric Paquette Racing   A/G-500/2   111.271
9116   Joe Daly   Fairway Motorsports   A/PF-1350/4   153.455
9393   James Silk, Jr   Tryitagain   M/G-1350/4   154.724
9173   Richard Lorenson   Richard Lorenson Racing   P/P-250/4   105.687
1402   Lloyd Frink, Sr   Sterling Hill Gang   M/PBG-650/4   79.503
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BG-2000/4   244.260
9420   Warren Matthews   Coconut Customs   M/G-400/2   94.735
1111   Todd Dross   Scott Guthrie Racing   SC/F-2000/4   171.520
262   Bill Franey   Salt Wheels Racing   APS/PF-2000/4   151.232
9444   Phillip Campbell   NTTRAIN   MPS/BF-3000/4   229.060
1107   Josh Owen   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BF-2000/4   222.540
9393   James Silk, Jr   Tryitagain   M/G-1350/4   160.702
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/F-1000/4   198.146
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PF-350/4   73.671
9465   Roy Brooks   Brooks Racing   M/F-1650/4   199.344
9421   C T Schaefer   PRT Racing   P/PP-650/4   111.630
9116   Joe Daly   Fairway Motorsports   A/PF-1350/4   153.848
1401   Seth Frink   Sterling Hill Gang   A/BF-175/2   71.540
9383   Eric Paquette   Eric Paquette Racing   A/G-500/2   115.033
1402   Lloyd Frink, Sr   Sterling Hill Gang   M/PBF-650/4   79.295
9444   Phillip Campbell   NTTRAIN   MPS/BF-3000/4   231.095
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BG-3000/4   244.545
1111   Todd Dross   Scott Guthrie Racing   SC/F-3000/4   175.891
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/F-1000/4   203.536
9383   Eric Paquette   Eric Paquette Racing   A/G-500/2   119.507
9173   Richard Lorenson   Richard Lorenson Racing   P/P-250/4   106.770
9102   Milton Paul   MP Racing   P/P-500/4   127.213
9465   Roy Brooks   Brooks Racing   M/F-1650/4   202.853
1440   Dean Sabatinelli   Sabatinelli/Guthrie Racing   APS/BF-1000/4   205.301
9389   Tom Crompton   Krypton Racing   M/G-175/4   64.409
1111   Todd Dross   Scott Guthrie Racing   SC/G-1350/4   166.982
1402   Lloyd Frink, Sr   Sterling Hill Gang   P/PP-500/4   80.002
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   APS/BG-1350/4   264.130
9526   Mike Brakel   80 Theory   P/P-1650/4   206.256
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PBG-350/4   76.964
1401   Seth Frink   Sterling Hill Gang   A/BF-175/2   82.251
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   APS/BG-1650/4   267.006
1302   Joe Timney   Twin Jugs Racing   APS/F-3000/4   196.202
9421   C T Schaefer   PRT Racing   P/PP-650/4   114.480
9526   Mike Brakel   80 Theory   P/P-2000/4   205.221
9389   Tom Crompton   Krypton Racing   MPS/F-175/4   67.333
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PF-400/4   77.086
9727   John Ubermath   John Ubermath Racing   MPS/G-2000/4   205.615
1107   Josh Owen   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BF-3000/4   223.131
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/BG-1000/4   201.843
1402   Lloyd Frink, Sr   Sterling Hill Gang   P/PP-750/4   80.246
9420   Warren Matthews   Coconut Customs   M/G-400/2   100.756
1401   Seth Frink   Sterling Hill Gang   A/BF-250/2   80.343
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   APS/BG-2000/4   266.130
262   Bill Franey   Salt Wheels Racing   APS/PF-2000/4   158.208
9526   Mike Brakel   80 Theory   P/P-3000/4   205.883
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PBF-400/4   75.204
1107   Josh Owen   Scott Guthrie Racing   A/BF-3001/4   225.637
9190   William Hosler   William Hosler Racing   MPS/G-2000/4   207.794
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PBG-400/4   76.982
9444   Phillip Campbell   NTTRAIN   MPS/BF-3000/4   232.425
9635   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   MPS/F-350/4   104.130
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   APS/BG-3000/4   266.919
1302   Joe Timney   Twin Jugs Racing   APS/F-3000/4   199.476
9173   Richard Lorenson   Richard Lorenson Racing   P/P-250/4   107.731
9190   William Hosler   William Hosler Racing   MPS/G-3000/4   207.760
1400   Lloyd Frink, IV   Sterling Hill Gang   A/PBF/350/4   77.844
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/G-1000/4   203.965
1401   Seth Frink   Sterling Hill Gang   A/F250/2   76.182
9444   Phillip Campbell   NTTRAIN   MPS/BF-3000/4   233.317
9727   John Ubermath   John Ubermath Racing   MPS/G-2000/4   208.962
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   APS/BG-3001+/4   269.332
1302   Joe Timney   Twin Jugs Racing   APS/F-3000/4   200.619
1110   Dean Sabatinelli   Scott Guthrie Racing   APS/BG-3001+/4   269.776

Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Joe Timney on September 20, 2010, 07:30:47 AM
New Two club members:

 
9232   Luke Kohler   Red Hot Racing   C/BFALT   201.252
850   Frank Waddell   Waddell Bros. Underdog   CG/RS   206.469
462   Keith Turk   So-Al Racing   AA/CBGC   205.198
9731   Greg Neal   TLN Motorsports   APS/G-1000/4   202.110
729   Dick and Gail Jurkowski   Dick Jurkowski   A/GC   200.919
9456   Bob Self   Half Fast Racing   AA/BGC   218.113
462   David Freiburger   So-Al Racing   AA/CBFALT   213.457
850   Larry Waddell   Waddell Bros. Underdog   B/GRS   210.285
462   Tonya Turk   So-Al Racing   AA/CBGALT   208.097
9526   Mike Brakel   80 Theory   P/P-1650/4   206.256
9727   John Ubermath   John Ubermath Racing   MPS/G-2000/4   205.615
1946   Ron SanGiovanni, Jr.   VanBlarcom & Gilmore Racing   A/BFR   208.690
9492   John Ciancitto   Streamline Bros   B/CFALT   200.834
7100   Gary Beineke   Gary Beineke   AA/GCT   208.478
1302   Joe Timney   Twin Jugs Racing   APS/F-3000/4   200.619
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: DahMurf on September 20, 2010, 08:08:08 AM

Here they are so you can review them before Donna starts doing your record certificates.
Motorcycles:
9221   Bradley Everhart   Bradley Everhart Racing   APS/BF-2000/4   197.044

Shouldn't Bradley be in APS/PBF-2000/4? He's a pushrod isn't he? Not sure how he signed up but I'd check it! Way more impressive number on a pushrod!  :-D
;)

Debbie
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Joe Timney on September 20, 2010, 08:18:57 AM
Good catch Deb...thanks!!!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Cajun Kid on September 20, 2010, 10:47:35 AM
Yes Bradley is PUSHROD  Harley Motor

Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Joe Timney on September 20, 2010, 04:49:31 PM
Some how Stevie Van Blarcom missed the Two Club List...sorry buddy!!!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on September 20, 2010, 06:28:47 PM
Congratulations to Fernando Stelser for breaking my 129.047 record with all of his runs;

9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   129.393
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.548
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.625

Does anybody know what kind of a car he was running?
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Joe Timney on September 22, 2010, 07:21:12 AM
Record Certificates are done...Donna, her daughter Angela and Andrew DiMartino worked late into the night finishing them...I watched!!!  :evil: We will have them this weekend at Maxton. Any not picked up will be mailed some time next week.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: DahMurf on September 22, 2010, 08:24:10 AM
 :cheers:  :cheers:  :cheers:

Thank you!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: LittleLiner on September 25, 2010, 03:52:09 PM
Is there a reason that the Ford GT was classed as a Gas Coupe?

9456   Bob Self   Half Fast Racing   A/BGC   215.723
9456   Bob Self   Half Fast Racing   B/BGC   205.634
9456   Andrew Krauss   Half Fast Racing   C/BGC   211.759
9456   David Rudan, Jr   Half Fast Racing   C/BGT   217.517

http://picasaweb.google.com/bobdill112/Loring2010Sunday?authkey=Gv1sRgCNvv0ubM5LH07gE&feat=directlink#5502782180718384498
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Stan Back on September 25, 2010, 06:58:57 PM
Three engine swaps in one meet!!!

Those guys east of the Mississippi are fast!!!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: LittleLiner on September 25, 2010, 07:10:25 PM
Three engine swaps in one meet!!!

Those guys east of the Mississippi are fast!!!

As you probably know Stan, the rules at ECTA and Loring allow running up in displacement.  Likely they used the same "C" engine in all classes entered.  I am just trying to figure out how a 2 place sports car was run in Gas Coupe.  Four issues - 1) only seats for 2 people, 2) no engine swap, 3) no quick change rear and 4) not running a non stock supercharger/turbocharger. 

Title: Re: Results?
Post by: interested bystander on September 25, 2010, 09:16:47 PM
Lil' Liner,

 Stan has his TONGUE planted firmly in his CHEEK when he comments about racin' on the Maxton "Hillbilly Highway"!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on October 30, 2010, 07:29:08 PM
Congratulations to Fernando Stelser for breaking my 129.047 record with all of his runs;

9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   129.393
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.548
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.625

Does anybody know what kind of a car he was running?

Thanks to some sharp eyes and people that want things done fairly, I have been informed that Fernando Stelser was competing in the G/GSS class driving an Audi TT Sport which has a TURBO and is not qualified to compete in that class. It was suggested that I get in touch with Fernando and see if he would like to get this matter straightened out with the LTA officicals. Granted I was not there at the event to protest him, but I am still of the opinion that the results of his runs should not stand as  record in G/GSS, he should have been competing in G/BGSS.

I don't mind competeing and even being beat by cars that are qulified to compete in my class, but rules are rules. I do plan on being at Loring for the 2012 event.

I have not been able to find out how to get in touch with Fernando, but He can reach me by email at iamflagman@aol.com.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Caveman on October 30, 2010, 09:22:47 PM
Three engine swaps in one meet!!!

Those guys east of the Mississippi are fast!!!

As you probably know Stan, the rules at ECTA and Loring allow running up in displacement.  Likely they used the same "C" engine in all classes entered.  I am just trying to figure out how a 2 place sports car was run in Gas Coupe.  Four issues - 1) only seats for 2 people, 2) no engine swap, 3) no quick change rear and 4) not running a non stock supercharger/turbocharger. 



I was there as a vol, and while I can't speak to your questions on #1,2, & 3...  I do know they were running a non-stock supercharger.  No sure how that impacts things.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: bvillercr on October 30, 2010, 09:47:20 PM
Congratulations to Fernando Stelser for breaking my 129.047 record with all of his runs;

9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   129.393
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.548
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.625

Does anybody know what kind of a car he was running?

Thanks to some sharp eyes and people that want things done fairly, I have been informed that Fernando Stelser was competing in the G/GSS class driving an Audi TT Sport which has a TURBO and is not qualified to compete in that class. It was suggested that I get in touch with Fernando and see if he would like to get this matter straightened out with the LTA officicals. Granted I was not there at the event to protest him, but I am still of the opinion that the results of his runs should not stand as  record in G/GSS, he should have been competing in G/BGSS.

I don't mind competeing and even being beat by cars that are qulified to compete in my class, but rules are rules. I do plan on being at Loring for the 2012 event.

I have not been able to find out how to get in touch with Fernando, but He can reach me by email at iamflagman@aol.com.

Could the results be a mistake in class?  Don't the inspectors verify blown or unblown.  That's not a small mistake. :|
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on October 31, 2010, 01:36:54 AM
Congratulations to Fernando Stelser for breaking my 129.047 record with all of his runs;

9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   129.393
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.548
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.625

Does anybody know what kind of a car he was running?

Thanks to some sharp eyes and people that want things done fairly, I have been informed that Fernando Stelser was competing in the G/GSS class driving an Audi TT Sport which has a TURBO and is not qualified to compete in that class. It was suggested that I get in touch with Fernando and see if he would like to get this matter straightened out with the LTA officicals. Granted I was not there at the event to protest him, but I am still of the opinion that the results of his runs should not stand as  record in G/GSS, he should have been competing in G/BGSS.

I don't mind competeing and even being beat by cars that are qulified to compete in my class, but rules are rules. I do plan on being at Loring for the 2012 event.

I have not been able to find out how to get in touch with Fernando, but He can reach me by email at iamflagman@aol.com.

Could the results be a mistake in class?  Don't the inspectors verify blown or unblown.  That's not a small mistake. :|

I would think that this was an honest mistake, but a mistake just the same and his speed should not stand as a record in the G/GSS class, as it does at this time according the the posted records.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on October 31, 2010, 09:22:24 AM
 I talked to Fernando about his car it was stock has a stock turbo. When I talked to him he didn't know what class he was in. He should have been in G/BGT or G/BGSS that I was running. He was  miss-classified.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: dw230 on October 31, 2010, 01:26:22 PM
Troy,

The impound is done on an honor system. You fill out your own cert.

"...he didn't know what class he was in."

This just about says it all.

DW
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: LittleLiner on October 31, 2010, 02:20:14 PM
Troy,

The impound is done on an honor system. You fill out your own cert.

"...he didn't know what class he was in."

This just about says it all.

DW

Ditto.

Judging from the photos of various cars that ran there were others that were a bit outside what is allowed for classes.  Example was one Street roadster with no fenders.   From what I can tell the records in question were generally still somewhat 'soft', speed wise, and over time will be pushed up by 100% class legal cars.  However the Ford GT running as a Gas Coupe and setting records over 200 in each class is just wrong.  Those also qualified for 200mph club hats . . .

Title: Re: Results?
Post by: dw230 on October 31, 2010, 09:37:55 PM
t the book it is a direct reprint of the ECTA book down to the season champions, course length of 1 mile, on and on.

DW
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Cajun Kid on November 01, 2010, 12:49:38 PM
Guys, maybe I have read to much into your replies, but to me they seem a bit demeaning and critical to and of  the LTA,,, "IF SO"

Then just give LTA a chance, it is a NEW deal and has only just recently completed it's second event.  I am sure they will work the bugs out. Using the ECTA rules was only natural and reprinting the book was a temporary fix for the time being. I am sure they will have there own book in the future which list LTA's records and specifics  etc... the actual safety rules and class rules should be the same.

I would expect that the LTA will use the same rules as ECTA (which in "most" cases are like SCTA safety rules) main differences are class and procedures, as  ECTA allows running up in engine class and has a few differant classes like circle track etc.

Let's all try to SUPPORT each racing venue this West vs East who's better than who is not good.. we all need to pull for each other and continue to expand and promote this hobby we all love.

We all know Bonneville/SCTA is the Speed Capital of the World and the LSR Mecca, but allow these new venues like the LTA to get it right.. rather than poke fun, lend a hand, or at least provide words of encouragement. Your many years of experience should be used to help, not to criticise or demean the efforts to get a new venue up and running.

Thank you very much.

Charles  (just a guy who likes to race and have fun .. don't you all too ?)



Title: Re: Results?
Post by: RidgeRunner on November 01, 2010, 01:18:13 PM
Big +1.  Couldn't have worded it any better myself.

                     Ed
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: dw230 on November 01, 2010, 02:23:21 PM
I am a supporter of new venues. My post was not edited before I posted it. Should have read:

"At Speedweek I was given a LTA rulebook by an irate ECTA racer. Looking at the book I noticed that the course was listed as one mile in length and contained the contact info for the ECTA officials and Maxon records, etc."

My point is, I don't care if they allow a GT 40 to run as a Gas Coupe. The classes don't compare because of course length. I feel Loring should have been set up as a one mile, then you could compare performances. Just my opinion. I understand the concept of running up class to generate income for the event and as long as everyone is satisfied with the lack of record certification procedures I am good with that.

Good luck with any new event getting established, they are needed to maintain interest in the sport. I just don't get excited by all the claims.

DW
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: LittleLiner on November 01, 2010, 02:37:11 PM
Guys, maybe I have read to much into your replies, but to me they seem a bit demeaning and critical to and of the LTA,,, . . . . .

Hi Charles,    Yes, I think you may be reading to much into our posts, at least in my case.  That said, if you feel that we are being overly critical then (at least in my case) that means I did a bad job of wording my posts and for that I apologize.  

No criticism of LTA was intended.  What I was trying to do was to point out that some errors were made with a few of the classifications of a few of the cars and it might be a good idea to correct them before they become written in stone for all times.  

Fact is , my hat is off to the folks that were able to conceive and implement the LTA events.  I know I couldn't accomplish such a feat.  I wish I could have been there.  Sounds like it was a great event.

To make the next LTA event even better there are bound to be areas that can be tweaked and improved on.  One area is the classification of cars.  It appears that relying on the entrants to correctly class their entries without a review by someone in impound can lead to a few cases of the wrong car in the wrong class.  With so many open records that means that a wrong car (not 100% in accord with the rules) ends up being awarded a record.  This is not fair to those that will attend future events and run in those classes.

Example - your Stude is a Classic category unblown car.  How would you feel if some one entered a late model Firebird with a blown engine incorrectly entered in E/CGALT and set a record over 200 mph?  If that had happened I am sure you would have pointed out the error and it would have been corrected.  But, what if you weren't there and no one protested?   You show up next year and have this huge record to deal with.   Not good.

The other downside to having a loose impound is that it naturally casts a shadow over the authenticity of ALL the records that were set.  That might not be fair but it is human nature to react that way.  

I am not advocating someone writing a big check and flying in DW and few of his trusted SCTA impound buddies to police the event.  But it would be good to at least have someone that has taken the time to know the rules and is able to point out the obvious  - like a Sportscar ruining in Gas Coupe, or a Blown Car running in an unblown Super Street class or a Street Roadster without the correct body parts. That improvement will add to the well earned prestige of the LTA.

As DW already points out, in the rush to get the Loring venue up and running there are apparently some ECTA specific words that need to be edited.  And I realize that the running up in class deal is allowed.  But I am not talking about running up in class.  There were examples of runing in the wrong class.  That is something that ECTA does not allow and shouldn't be something that LTA knowing allows either.

So I guess my point is 1) good job LTA. but 2) there are a few minor things that need alittle more attention and I am sure you will get better and better . . . .
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Cajun Kid on November 01, 2010, 07:28:48 PM
Little Liner and DW,

I must say, very well worded posts and you do not owe anyone an apology. (especially me, as I am a nobody in this sport)...

I do agree that a few mistakes did happen, and I agree that running in the wrong class and setting a record should not be allowed.  I was only trying to point out that it "seemed to me" to be more about casting stones rather than offering experienced and rationale observations followed by constructive solutions and support.

I have run all volunteer start up venues before and I know how thankless and difficult it is to do, and I may be overly sensitive for our racing brothers at the LTA.  I try to lend my support and encouragement where ever I go, and I for one think the LTA has came a long way in a short time, and yes paperwork and procedural mistakes did happen and I hope they are corrected.  even more so I hope each event gets better and those areas of concern are resolved.

I myself look forward to the next LTA event, even though it is a 22 hour drive each way for me to get there to race,  I will step up and volunteer some of my race time to take a shift in car impound if there is not enough people signed up to help.
 
Or I can help in tech and while in tech maybe a step could be added to check that the car is entered / classed correctly ? I know that may not be the way tech works, but if it is classed correctly in tech, then unless a change  is made it should be OK in impound. ?

Just My thoughts.

Charles
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: RidgeRunner on November 02, 2010, 02:07:22 AM


     When I first heard about the Loring possibilities I also thought a 1 mile "standard" would make the most sense all around.  Was told "wait until you see this place".   Having heard a pitch line or two before, Ya, Ya,............  After an initial look see cruise down the course on arrival late Fri in '09 I realized how wrong I had been.  To not use the available extra 1/2 mile would be like having a barroom with no beer available, a terrible and bordering on criminal waste of space!  Maybe didn't quite match the first feelings I got on my first visit to the Salt but it sure ranked a darn close second.

     Perfect meet no, glitches yes, but considering everything some pretty darn impressive results after only 2 meets.  Between the organizers, volunteers, racers, and people up in the County it's only going to improve.  The "LSR family" is equal to that of Maxton and the Salt already.  Haven't been to any other LSR venues yet so can't pass judgement of any kind on those yet.

     Conflicting schedule for me this past meet, couldn't be in 2 places at once and made a tough choice to pass on Loring but looking forward to many more safaries "up in the county" [as well as Maxton and back to the Salt when I can].

     Admittedly a bit biased, it's only a 10 hr tow.

     Just try to call's 'em as I see's 'em, no more, no less, without pots to stir or axes to grind.

                                           Ed


Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Stan Back on November 02, 2010, 01:34:15 PM
Charles --

" I agree that running in the wrong class and setting a record should not be allowed." 

Like running in C class with an E motor?


"Or I can help in tech and while in tech maybe a step could be added to check that the car is  . . . classed correctly?"

I believe you mean that the vehicle is in the right category, not class.


I seem to remember the clamor for getting "record" certificates.  Perhaps with no scrutiny and I guess any "Impound" certification, a "Performance Certificate" would be more appropriate.  I saw veteran entries running in the wrong category -- and they should know better.  The honor system didn't seem to work.  And if one establishes a "record" that way, it makes it unfair for those that follow.

Don't get me wrong -- it looked like a blast to run there and get timed.  And it's a hell of a lot closer that Bonneville for many competitors.  And in many ways, safer than running on the dirt.  But how many records can one afford?  Pay the fee and get a different one each run?  How many is enough?

Stan Back
(And standing back waiting for this blast.)
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Cajun Kid on November 02, 2010, 02:58:24 PM
Stan Back,

I am sure you expect me to blast back a nice barrage, however I see the points you are trying to make in your last post.

I also know your example of running for a record in C with an E motor was aimed directly at me.  So let me "come back" at Mr Stan Back this way.

1. In both ECTA and LTA  the "written rules"  DO allow for running up in Motor Class.
2. And since the Rules ALLOW that, any entrant (me included) may "within the rules" decide to enter a smaller motor in a upper motor class.
3. You may disagree with those rules, however you may not criticise a racer who follows the rules, so TREAD lightly my friend when you "come back" at someone who is within the rules.

My feelings about the "current rules" allowing running up in motor class.

1. It is the current rule,,, so it is OK by me.
2. The smaller motor is handicapped by displacement,so what is the big deal?  it creates more revenue for the clubs and allows the racer a chance to run for more records.
3. Who does this hurt?  Let's use me as an example.  I hold  E/CGALT records at both ECTA and LTA  My car is a legit E/CGALT .. so if a legit  F/CGALT car decides to run on my E/CGALT record and beats me, then under the rules they are now the new record holder. Congratulations to them...I am OK with it, but you can bet I will be back at it to try to get the record again by going faster and not by whining about the rules.

Now on the other hand if a BLOWN car enters an UN BLOWN class (should never happen, but I understand it has) and gets a record ... that is clearly wrong and against any rules and that record if granted would then be in error of the rules and should be reversed.

See how clear ?

Charles
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on November 02, 2010, 03:06:17 PM
Stan Back,

I am sure you expect me to blast back a nice barrage, however I see the points you are trying to make in your last post.

I also know your example of running for a record in C with an E motor was aimed directly at me.  So let me "come back" at Mr Stan Back this way.

1. In both ECTA and LTA  the "written rules"  DO allow for running up in Motor Class.
2. And since the Rules ALLOW that, any entrant (me included) may "within the rules" decide to enter a smaller motor in a upper motor class.
3. You may disagree with those rules, however you may not criticise a racer who follows the rules, so TREAD lightly my friend when you "come back" at someone who is within the rules.

My feelings about the "current rules" allowing running up in motor class.

1. It is the current rule,,, so it is OK by me.
2. The smaller motor is handicapped by displacement,so what is the big deal?  it creates more revenue for the clubs and allows the racer a chance to run for more records.
3. Who does this hurt?  Let's use me as an example.  I hold  E/CGALT records at both ECTA and LTA  My car is a legit E/CGALT .. so if a legit  F/CGALT car decides to run on my E/CGALT record and beats me, then under the rules they are now the new record holder. Congratulations to them...I am OK with it, but you can bet I will be back at it to try to get the record again by going faster and not by whining about the rules.

Now on the other hand if a BLOWN car enters an UN BLOWN class (should never happen, but I understand it has) and gets a record ... that is clearly wrong and against any rules and that record if granted would then be in error of the rules and should be reversed.

See how clear ?

Charles



  Amen Charles :cheers: 
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Stan Back on November 02, 2010, 03:19:45 PM
Does anyone at Loring check to see if it's an E (or F, D, AA) motor?  Examples of vehicles running out of category when they should know better leads one to believe they could run out of lowest engine class, too.

Here's my vehicle, here's my entry fee, where's my "record"?

That's why Performance Certificates might better describe the action.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: 55chevr on November 02, 2010, 08:59:35 PM
Racers run up in engine class all the time and it is within the ECTA rules. 
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: bvillercr on November 02, 2010, 10:00:02 PM
Racers run up in engine class all the time and it is within the ECTA rules. 

I'm pretty sure that the SCTA used to do the same. :-D
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Stan Back on November 03, 2010, 11:56:23 AM
But we're talking Loring here.  Supposedly using the ECTA rules.

So I'd guess that somewhere in the ECTA rules they check displacement.  So you gotta E motor, and set an E motor ECTA record.  You get checked and car is somehow certifed to be what it is and you can run up in class from there -- right?

But we've seen that at Loring, on the honor system, there were entries that ran in the wrong CATEGORY and could have run in the wrong displacement CLASS as well.  When you can see from a hundred feet that a car is classed wrong, how can you tell its displacement even when standing closer?

Pick a class and category, get a "record" with no, or minimal, scrutinization.

I'd bet that most of the records in the ECTA where cars are running up are set in "holes" in the Record Book.  Nothing against the rules there.  But aren't they scrutinized at the base record?  And it does have more to do with establishing a record, rather than breaking one. 

But in the case that you set a "record" with no scrutinization, it may make it hard for a car to follow later to break the record with a rule-abiding car. 

So why not get a Speed Certification -- a real, certified statement that Car #12345 went 215.234 on this date and time.  Because we've seen what ran as Gas Coupes, Street Roadsters and more -- and the honor system don't work for everybody.

Stan Back
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: fredvance on November 03, 2010, 12:54:14 PM
Stan, ECTA and Loring does not measure motors!!
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: sabat on November 03, 2010, 01:27:50 PM
As Keith Turk says at every driver's meeting; "The ECTA operates on the honor system. If you want to get a record in a C class with an A engine, go for it, but you're the one who has to live with it."
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: blackslax on November 04, 2010, 07:30:40 PM
Hello Everyone.
We at the LTA are making every attempt to ensure that all of our records are correct.  There were several well qualified people at 2010 event to ensure that everyone was classed and registered properly, but mistakes can happen. I would like to make some points about the direction this particular forum is taking.

1) With the help and blessing of the ECTA we are presently using their rule book. These are a massive undertaking and until such time that we have our own, the ECTA book will serve our purpose to provide a Safe and Fun event.

2) ECTA allows running up in class.  The belief is that if a smaller displacement engine has the ability to surpass the record of a vehicle that on a technical level and by the rules should be faster, they have every right to beat the record.  Keep in mind that they must make a separate run for the record.  One run can not be used to cover multiple classes.

3) As Dean Sabat pointed out, The LTA, as well as the ECTA operate on the honor system.  We are responsible for a Safe-Fun-Fast event, not for rooting out cheaters.  We have a policy on our website regarding cheating and we adhere to it without exception.  If people choose to cheat, that is their burden to bear.

4)If anyone feels that there was an error made in classification of a vehicle, please advise the LTA at the event!  Since the vehicle is present at that time, scrutinization would be much easier there than here in cyberspace.  If that is not possible, please feel free to contact the LTA through the website. This is what we require:

a) The number of the vehicle in question.
b) The class that the record was set in.
c)  The class you feel is correct.
d) Your reasoning.

We will make every attempt to confirm the accuracy of your request.  Pictures can be sent, but in the event that different records were set with and without optional equipment, it will be difficult prove. Engine classification such as blown/unblown or engine displacement will be verified with the owner of the vehicle.

While we appreciate the open discussion and free flow of ideas provided by LANDRACING.COM, we do not feel it is appropriate to address individual grievances, rule changes, and proposed changes to the event in an open forum.

All the best and safe racing to everyone,

Tim Kelly
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Stan Back on November 04, 2010, 07:44:20 PM
Sounds like you got it in hand.  Good luck in the future.

Stan
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Cajun Kid on November 04, 2010, 08:57:24 PM
Tim/blackslax

Great explanation and right on point.

Charles
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: LittleLiner on November 05, 2010, 01:53:14 PM
Tim . . . Many thanks for the feedback.   I for one see a great future for Loring and appreciate all you guys are doing to make things happen for LTA.   

. . . . . . . 3) As Dean Sabat pointed out, The LTA, as well as the ECTA operate on the honor system.  We are responsible for a Safe-Fun-Fast event, not for rooting out cheaters.  We have a policy on our website regarding cheating and we adhere to it without exception.  If people choose to cheat, that is their burden to bear.       . . . . . Tim Kelly
I would like to make one additional point.  Although I noted what appeared to be a few cars that were incorrectly classed, I did not mean to imply in any way that anyone intentionally cheated.  Looks more like misunderstanding some of the rules.

Art
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: Stan Back on November 05, 2010, 06:52:17 PM
You're way too kind in at least one case.

Stan
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on November 16, 2010, 01:30:48 PM
  Thanks for the record certificates. But, you only needed to send one for my highest class record of the meet.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: saltwheels262 on November 16, 2010, 05:43:37 PM
  Thanks for the record certificates. But, you only needed to send one for my highest class record of the meet.

same here.

thanx,
franey
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on April 09, 2011, 06:12:14 PM
Congratulations to Fernando Stelser for breaking my 129.047 record with all of his runs;

9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   129.393
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.548
9445   Fernando Stelser   Fernando Stelser Racing   G/GSS   130.625

Does anybody know what kind of a car he was running?

Thanks to some sharp eyes and people that want things done fairly, I have been informed that Fernando Stelser was competing in the G/GSS class driving an Audi TT Sport which has a TURBO and is not qualified to compete in that class. It was suggested that I get in touch with Fernando and see if he would like to get this matter straightened out with the LTA officicals. Granted I was not there at the event to protest him, but I am still of the opinion that the results of his runs should not stand as  record in G/GSS, he should have been competing in G/BGSS.

I don't mind competeing and even being beat by cars that are qulified to compete in my class, but rules are rules. I do plan on being at Loring for the 2012 event.

I have not been able to find out how to get in touch with Fernando, but He can reach me by email at iamflagman@aol.com.

Could the results be a mistake in class?  Don't the inspectors verify blown or unblown.  That's not a small mistake. :|

I would think that this was an honest mistake, but a mistake just the same and his speed should not stand as a record in the G/GSS class, as it does at this time according the the posted records.




While I was sitting in the staging lines at Maxton last weekend, I was informed by one of the LTA officials that was also at Maxton that this record issue has been resolved and my 2009 speed still stands as the official G/GSS record. I won't be at Loring this year due to my budget for Bonneville this year, but I will be up at Loring in 2012 to see if I can improve on that record if it is still standing by then, if not I'll try to break the newer one. Thanks LTA for following through with this!!

I'm sorry that I can't remember the LTA officials name, I have a hard enough time remembering my own name at times.(http://www.wanderlodgeownersgroup.com/ downloads/WOG%20SMILIES/olcoot.gif)
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: tedgram on April 10, 2011, 12:44:23 AM
 iamflagman, glad it's been resolved. I've been wondering what was going on there.
Title: Re: Results?
Post by: iamflagman on April 10, 2011, 04:37:48 AM
iamflagman, glad it's been resolved. I've been wondering what was going on there.



Thanks again for your help and support on this issue!!