Landracing Forum

Misc Forums => LSR General Chat => Topic started by: tallguy on May 16, 2014, 10:45:10 PM

Title: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: tallguy on May 16, 2014, 10:45:10 PM
It doesn't make any sense to me for anyone to concern themselves
with a "women's" record, specifically.  How many of us -- especially
those who can't afford "sexual reassignment surgery" -- have much
control regarding whether we are male or female? 

If people lose sleep over land speed records specified by gender, where
will it end?  How about a "blonde" record, or a "tall, wearing
glasses -- but it has to be bifocal on the left side, and farsighted only on
the right side" record?

Having different classes based on type of vehicle, and/or type of fuel
makes sense to me.  I suggest we all ignore gender regarding land
speed records.  And please, don't get me started regarding sexual
preference, religion, or quantity of freckles!

Tallguy, a person of (some) color.  I'm not totally transparent!
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: RichFox on May 16, 2014, 10:52:03 PM
What started this?
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: Milwaukee Midget on May 16, 2014, 11:15:01 PM
What started this?

Tallguy.
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: Freud on May 16, 2014, 11:59:23 PM
If he is in Lakester class he probably doesn't want to run against

Tanis Hammon or Dr. Jeannie Pflum.

FREUD
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: tauruck on May 17, 2014, 12:00:57 AM
May be that some chick broke one of his records?.

Long Cool Woman in a Black Dress comes to mind. :-D :-D
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: salt27 on May 17, 2014, 02:15:58 AM
If a lady was to ride a motorcycle wearing the same suit Dr. Freud has used in the past, record or not she would probably get more attention.

Not that we would want to put it to the test.   :evil:

Sorry Doc. 

All kidding aside I'm not aware of "gender-specific records" but the SCTA rule book is the only one I'm somewhat familiar with.

  Don
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: Peter Jack on May 17, 2014, 04:24:03 AM
Sounds like he's worried about Guinness records and they're only records because Guinness calls them that. The legitimate organizations that recognize landspeed records don't worry about gender and yet there are a fair number of legitimate records held by women. More power to them! :cheers: :cheers: :cheers:

Pete
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: ski123 on May 18, 2014, 05:14:44 PM
I thought the NAE folks covered this topic last fall.
I believe it was a solid kind of yes/no thingy.
Or was is a no/yes..........Go Fast USA!
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: Glen on May 18, 2014, 06:03:58 PM
Seems like tall guy is lacking oxygen, what brings this up anyway. SCTA is proud of it's women drivers and riders. we have a bunch in our clubs as well. If you did some research you would see that they go back to the 1940s.  :cheers:
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: tallguy on May 19, 2014, 12:00:18 AM
Hey, everyone . . . it appears there's some misunderstanding of my
intended message (the beginning of this thread).  I have a great
respect for all landspeed racers, and I have no problem with women
breaking the records.  More power to ALL racers. 

My issue is with people making a big deal about the racer's sex.  I
don't think it should be made into a big deal, because it's demeaning
to do that.

For example, if I were to mention that that the quickest E.T. for the
standing-start quarter mile is held by Kitty O'neil, I don't dwell on
details of her gender, any more than I would mention her height or
other genetic items such as her skin color.

I hope this helps clear up any misunderstand about my intended
point.

Tallguy



Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: tortoise on May 19, 2014, 03:52:05 PM
The run he's talking about was at Elmo on 7/6/77. Claimed ET is 3.225 seconds. The timing is said to have been done by the SCTA team.  This looks like a pretty plausible claim as the fastest quarter mile ET ever, though it doesn't meet any recognized sanctioning organization's requirements. A hell of a run, though.

Does anyone have any memories of this event?

Oddly enough, Kitty O'Neil, for a different run, was ballyhooed for one of those gender-specific records tallguy  quite rightly complains about.
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: racefanwfo on May 19, 2014, 05:45:20 PM
From wiki

In 1977 in the Mojave Desert, she piloted a hydrogen peroxide powered rocket dragster built by Ky Michaelson to the quickest quarter mile elapsed time in auto history, with a timed run of 3.22 seconds at 396 mph (637 km/h) with an average speed of 279.5 mph (449.8 km/h). During the same time, she also made a quarter mile run with a top speed of 412 mph (663 km/h)
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: TrickyDicky on May 20, 2014, 08:08:15 AM
The run he's talking about was at Elmo on 7/6/77. Claimed ET is 3.225 seconds. The timing is said to have been done by the SCTA team.  This looks like a pretty plausible claim as the fastest quarter mile ET ever, though it doesn't meet any recognized sanctioning organization's requirements. A hell of a run, though.


The FIA has Kitty O'Neill as the current holder of the 1/2km standing start record (average speed of 207.739mph).  Also with the Ky Michaelson Rocket Car, but one day later (7/7/77) and at Bonneville.
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: Malcolm UK on May 20, 2014, 09:51:53 AM
Also with the Ky Michaelson Rocket Car, but one day later (7/7/77) and at Bonneville.

European dating might have meant a month apart.  Who timed at Bonneville - would it have been Mr Petrali Snr?
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: dw230 on May 20, 2014, 01:27:08 PM
 I think it may have been the late Jack Dolan.

DW
Title: Re: Gender-specific records? Not a good idea, in my opinion
Post by: tortoise on May 20, 2014, 01:41:35 PM
From the article at draglist.com by Ky Michaelson:

"Kitty O'Neil drove this same car on the Mojave Desert to a speed of over 400 mph in the quarter mile. She backed it up with a 396 MPH, 3.22 ET pass. This run was also the quickest quarter mile run in history.
We had all kinds of problems with clocks that day. The same people who time the International runs at Bonneville were there with their old timing equipment. We also had a set of Chrondek clocks. Their old clocks were hit and miss. Sometimes they would catch a time and some time they would not. The person who wrote a newspaper article that mentioned a 3.72-second ET for Kitty was a little confused. We had the lights set up to get the ET at the quarter mile mark. The other set were the speed trap lights at the 500-meter mark. Before the end of the day, we wanted an all out run. If I remember right, the speed traps were measured between 120 feet. The interesting part was when we slowed the car down, their lights worked every time. In the three days we were there, we made 13 runs. The lowest ET was 3.22 before Kitty bent up the car."
 
No clarification on the date.