That Davis article is a puzzle.
He spends all that time calculating engine size, VE, 3456, converts MPH into f/s, blah (which, IMHO, if the reader did not know what these were this is not a project within his competence).
And then no explanation of the effect of increased MPH (pressure), or the target air speed in the duct?
His formula incorporates the square root of MPH as a size variable:
200 MPH duct is 1 รท (2^.5) vs. a 100 MPH duct, or 70.71% duct area, while the density due to pressure only increases from 14.88 to 15.4 (assuming 14.7 psi base) or 96.6% area.
Am I tripping over something important?