Author Topic: Lift or Down Force ?  (Read 8555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SPARKY

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6912
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #30 on: December 08, 2010, 08:46:35 AM »
"IMO a little lift goes a long way, most time the wrong way."

I admit it , I am a coward about body lift ever since my 65 160 mph Olds road walked--bad-- with out a substanal rake. The reason I like solid suspension on LSR cars I want to minimize the chance of the angle of attack changing. It doesn't much matter which is the cause, the spoiler creating down force, or the front end lifting because of pressuer changes. Without good data, which I do not have,  I would rather put up with the problems of unsprung.
Miss LIBERTY,  changing T.K.I.  to noise, dust, rust, BLUE HATS & hopefully not scrap!!

"Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."   Helen Keller

We are going to explore the racing N words NITROUS & NITRO!

Offline Cajun Kid

  • Rajun Cajun Racing E/CGALT 5690
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
  • Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #31 on: December 08, 2010, 10:30:38 AM »
I too want to make sure I know what the car is doing on the big end...

On board data and wind tunnel data... seems to be the answer...

eye ball engineering and seat of the pants are only good up until the point that they aren't !!

Charles
ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
B/CGALT, C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder and 200 Club Member
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, C/CGALT,   E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  203.343mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 196.967mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 213.624mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Loring 204.109mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com

Offline SPARKY

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6912
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #32 on: December 08, 2010, 12:20:06 PM »
spot on
Miss LIBERTY,  changing T.K.I.  to noise, dust, rust, BLUE HATS & hopefully not scrap!!

"Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."   Helen Keller

We are going to explore the racing N words NITROUS & NITRO!

Offline MAZDA1807

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #33 on: December 08, 2010, 03:06:20 PM »
You could run solid suspension until you want to run a production class. I believe the rulebook says "original running gear design" or something close to that.
80ci,264.7 RWHP, 19.2sq.ft. of frontal area, 175.611, NOTBAD

Offline Stan Back

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5890
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #34 on: December 08, 2010, 03:24:21 PM »
But I'm not sure they check the "compliance" of the shock absorbers (nor do they want to).

Stan
Past (Only) Member of the San Berdoo Roadsters -- "California's Most-Exclusive Roadster Club" -- 19 Years of Bonneville and/or El Mirage Street Roadster Records

Offline MAZDA1807

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #35 on: December 08, 2010, 03:29:40 PM »
But I'm not sure they check the "compliance" of the shock absorbers (nor do they want to).

Stan
In inspection at SW we made a car find some coilovers because he had A-arm suspension with solid struts in place of the shock/coilover.
80ci,264.7 RWHP, 19.2sq.ft. of frontal area, 175.611, NOTBAD

Offline MAZDA1807

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #36 on: December 08, 2010, 03:38:27 PM »
I can only speak for myself in inspection, but we should be as throe as possible. I'm sure Dan has seen stuff thrown out of impound for less. It only takes the other guy(s) in your class to go snooping around to try and find some way to protest. Just saying.
Peter.
80ci,264.7 RWHP, 19.2sq.ft. of frontal area, 175.611, NOTBAD

Offline Cajun Kid

  • Rajun Cajun Racing E/CGALT 5690
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
  • Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #37 on: December 08, 2010, 04:40:12 PM »
I prefer suspension, and my home track is Maxton, therfore suspension is a good thing.  I just has some fine tuning to do.. Since those pics are from the Stude's firts runs at Maxton (where I had the car set up as high off the ground as I could) in order to make certain my air dam or other parts of the car did not hit the track or the return road.   Now I can lower the front 1/2 to 3/4 inch which
will increase the rake and most probably reduce or eliminate the front lift.  It lay however increase the rear down force, so then I would have to decrease the rear ride height, or spolier lip angle or spolier lip surface lenght or some combination of those 3. 

Hmm,, looks like I better reserve an extra hour of wind tunnel time ?

Charles
ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
B/CGALT, C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder and 200 Club Member
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, C/CGALT,   E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  203.343mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 196.967mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 213.624mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Loring 204.109mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com

Offline krusty

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 252
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #38 on: December 08, 2010, 06:48:34 PM »
Charles    1) You should have in your set up notes the distance from the bottom of the air dam to the ground (if not, bad boy, you need to know this and have other measurements recorded,too).             
             2) If this # was less than the sidewall height of your tire at set up pressure, it means that you have front lift (as jl222 said "eyeball engineering"). At the speeds you're running front tire growth is not going to have a big effect on the tire height.
              3) I think you'll learn more in the tunnel (for the equivalent $$ spent on data acquisition, at least chassis-wise) than buying a data system for next year, unless you've got the $$ to spend on both. I'd gladly discuss this with you (we need to do lunch during the upcoming holiday season, anyway.)
              4) I'd gladly help you with a plan of attack for the tunnel which will optimize your efforts (I do have some experience here), and accompany you to assist.   
               vic 

Offline Cajun Kid

  • Rajun Cajun Racing E/CGALT 5690
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
  • Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford
Re: Lift or Down Force ?
« Reply #39 on: December 08, 2010, 07:59:13 PM »
Vic,  yes I do have notes (and you know why I keep some data to myself)....

and yes when I go to the tunnel I will need some help and will keep you informed.

Call me and we can grab lunch next week or the following...

Charles
ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
B/CGALT, C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder and 200 Club Member
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, C/CGALT,   E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  203.343mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 196.967mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 213.624mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Loring 204.109mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com