A question/thought on the Hayabusa based V8. I don't think anyone would argue it is a single engine as they use one crank, one crankcase and one management system but! Is it legal, Under SCTA rules, as a motorcycle? Motorcycles must use motorcycle engines, one or two depending on the class. People point to Bub7 as an engine that's never been seen in a production motorcycle but SCTA agreed it was from conception to installation, a motorcycle engine. There is an English gentleman working on an assault on a bike record that plans to power it with a Busa based V8. Unless he has something in writing from the SCTA I think he might be in for a surprise. There are several Hayabusa based V8 engines out there but all were conceived and built for use in CARS! To my knowledge, his is the first use of one in a bike. Chrysler had a show "bike" with a Viper V10. Does that make it legal as an SCTA motorcycle streamliner?
I'd say unless the class requires a "production based" engine, you should be able to build your own. The question ends up being what constitutes an engine vs. two?
One crank? Not necessarily as there are examples of production engines with multiple crankshafts.
One crankcase? I would think a single crankcase would qualify as a single engine. I don't think you could bolt together that crankcase but if it's welded into a single case I'd have to argue it's legal. Cast or welded, there are production examples of both.
One engine management system? Not necessarily as there production engines that use two separate systems. I don't think any of the twin engine guys are using a single management system but I'm surprised they don't as I’d think it could simplify tuning.
Rules. Do you ask for clarification (get it in writing!) and run the possibility of having an innovative idea overruled or do you build within rules as written, and in some cases, previously enforced? I think pushing the envelope IS the challenge of Bonneville but we can't afford to build it then see if it gets past tech the way NASCAR did/does?