Author Topic: Jan 3rd 2010 - Standing Mile Runs Results  (Read 2319 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline entropy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 731
Re: Jan 3rd 2010 - Standing Mile Runs Results
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2010, 04:11:23 AM »
add about 2.5% to those speeds, clocks were off  :cheers:

Offline redcatch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 56
Re: Jan 3rd 2010 - Standing Mile Runs Results
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2010, 05:54:55 PM »
Attended 3 January meet. Made two runs lost alternator went home.
Lack of medical personal and no fire truck makes me more than a little nervous . Field was mostly street cars very little safety gear. The runway is wonderful and smooth as glass. Almost a mile to shut down in. Great facility. Hope no one gets hurt. Would love to see ECTA get involved.
Bob Cox
Bob Cox
Redcatcher Motorsports

ECTA Record Holder
B/GALT

redcatch32@aol.com

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8969
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: Jan 3rd 2010 - Standing Mile Runs Results
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2010, 06:02:26 PM »
add about 2.5% to those speeds, clocks were off  :cheers:

So the clocks were 15 to 16 inches off in distance....  maybe.... ya probably wouldn't complain if they were 15 inches short....
they might need to buy a couple of hours of consultation with the Rice brothers.
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline entropy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 731
Re: Jan 3rd 2010 - Standing Mile Runs Results
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2010, 12:52:06 AM »
add about 2.5% to those speeds, clocks were off  :cheers:

So the clocks were 15 to 16 inches off in distance....  maybe.... ya probably wouldn't complain if they were 15 inches short....
they might need to buy a couple of hours of consultation with the Rice brothers.

I'm not complaining, just saying...

and you are correct, i wouldn't be saying if the clocks were closer :-D