Author Topic: Engine displacement tolerance?  (Read 7423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Engine displacement tolerance?
« on: June 29, 2009, 08:42:26 PM »
I don't see it in the rule book but is there a tolerance over the specified engine displacements that will allow a slight over bore to clean up the cylinders?? Hope SCTA is not like Nascar!

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.

Offline Dynoroom

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2192
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2009, 09:15:41 PM »
It depends on what you think losing a record is worth? SCTA won't fine you though..... :-D

As far as displacement goes it is in the rule book. If you use "D" engines size as an example the rule book says 261 ci to 305 ci. However the next class ("B") starts at 306 ci. That means your "D" motor can be 305.99999999 ci if you want to get that close, I wouldn't.
Michael LeFevers
Kugel and LeFevers Pontiac Firebird

Without Data You're Just Another Guy With An Opinion!

Racing is just a series of "Problem Solving" events that allow you to spend money & make noise...

Offline Brian Westerdahl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 271
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2009, 09:26:25 PM »
Just remember when you tow back to impound on your record run drive real slow.

Offline willieworld

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1818
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2009, 09:37:17 PM »
in the motorcycle classes--- P you can bore to your class limit -- M, A, S,SC, and SCS .020 over the class limit is allowed --except any vintage class .050 over the class limit is allowed ---------------and as i understand the rule book any over bore above the class limit will be noted in the log book and the over bore above the class limit will be discounted if you want to move up an engine size class ------------willie buchta
« Last Edit: June 29, 2009, 09:43:23 PM by willieworld »
willie-dpombatmir-buchta

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8968
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2009, 11:18:18 PM »
Rex, are you thinking about running a 750 cc in J class?  We sure scared the crap out of ourselves the first time we ran J with a 748cc motor.  Didn't do any inch calculations, they called it the 3/4 liter class... when they measured it at 45.7 we nearly croaked... then learned 45.999999999 was OK
« Last Edit: June 30, 2009, 07:57:18 AM by Stainless1 »
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2009, 01:07:58 AM »
Stainless,
I've been looking at the G class, two liters, 93 to 122 cu. in. The engine I am looking at is 121.87 cu. inches so I have a whole 1.13 cu. inch to "play" with, that is a whole .016 inch over bore!  Just "salt dreaming" right now but the G lakester class records looks softer than the stuff you have ran in the J,I, and H classes. Might be able to get 240 hp out of it without mortgaging the house.

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.

Offline AdioSS

  • New folks
  • Posts: 16
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2009, 04:13:14 AM »
Stainless,
I've been looking at the G class, two liters, 93 to 122 cu. in. The engine I am looking at is 121.87 cu. inches so I have a whole 1.13 cu. inch to "play" with, that is a whole .016 inch over bore!  Just "salt dreaming" right now but the G lakester class records looks softer than the stuff you have ran in the J,I, and H classes. Might be able to get 240 hp out of it without mortgaging the house.

Rex
122 - 121.87 = .230

what bore, stroke, & cylinder count?

Offline salt27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2009, 09:48:36 AM »
122 - 121.87 = .130  :roll:

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8968
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2009, 10:24:29 AM »
OK guys, Rex has the math the closest... New book, g - 93 to 122.99...
Don't think I would push it past stock bore... the parts will be cheaper and easier to procure
stop dreaming and start building
see ya on the salt  8-)
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2009, 10:15:30 PM »
Working on some tooling for it right now, hope to have the build table done next couple of months. I know it is $hit of get off the pot time!!!!

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.

Offline Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13167
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2009, 09:56:42 AM »
Showing up at impound with a 25# CO2 fire extinguisher, just to cool off and therefore hopefully shrink the motor a tad, is generally frowned upon.  Ditto bringing a giant deep freeze and dropping the motor into cold water -- then to freeze solid.

That's why we've built a motor in the 1350 class -- at 1348 cc.  Leave a little room for "just-in-case".
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline Cajun Kid

  • Rajun Cajun Racing E/CGALT 5690
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
  • Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2009, 10:47:34 PM »
Jon,,, I think it can actually grow 2 cc's ??  1348 and a 1350 is close,,, or is it  1348 on a 1350.99 ?

Car displacment works like that...   I am 255.xx on a 260.99 with "E" motor and 370.0x on a 372.99 with the "C" motor..

Charles
ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
B/CGALT, C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder and 200 Club Member
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, C/CGALT,   E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  203.343mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 196.967mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 213.624mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Loring 204.109mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com

Offline Seldom Seen Slim

  • Nancy and me and the pit bike
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13167
  • Nancy -- 201.913 mph record on a production ZX15!
    • Nancy and Jon's personal website.
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #12 on: July 02, 2009, 10:06:44 AM »
Well, okay -- think about it realistically.  By the time the motor has cooled enough to be opened up for measuring -- it'll be back to "as-built" dimensions, so trying to shrink it is mostly a joke. 

I hope we don't have to resort to such drama. . .
Jon E. Wennerberg
 a/k/a Seldom Seen Slim
 Skandia, Michigan
 (that's way up north)
2 Club member x2
Owner of landracing.com

Offline AdioSS

  • New folks
  • Posts: 16
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #13 on: July 06, 2009, 09:24:30 PM »
122 - 121.87 = .130  :roll:
Note to self: Never do math after midnight...

Offline NathanStewart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1241
Re: Engine displacement tolerance?
« Reply #14 on: July 13, 2009, 04:30:59 PM »
Sleeve it down or offset grind the crank.  Or do both...
El Mirage 200 MPH Club Member