It is tempting, Mike. I am sort of low on money right now. This is the year when the motor is being built. The Greeks had problems with Pandora and her box. They would have written about race motors instead, if they had them.
Thanks for the help with the photo, Freud. It was hard to see it the way I did it.
The last engine wore out really fast. About 10,000 miles and only seven runs down the salt. Some work with PipeMax is helping me figure out what happened, I think. The first step is to look at my last good motor as a reference. Triumph in Hinckley built it, not me. It was in pretty good shape after 20,000 miles and ten runs down the salt from a wear standpoint. This first page is the engine data. The second page is the valve and cam calculations. First I look at minimum valve lift to prevent choke at 7,400 rpm. It is .315 and .293 for the intake and exhaust, respectively. The actual lifts are .374 and .370 for intake and exhaust. The 790 cams have plenty of lift for he 790cc motor.
The "Operating RPM Ranges of Various Components" vary, but the bracket the 7,400 rpm target I have for maximum horsepower. It looks like the cams and valves match the displacement, compression ratio, and the target RPM.