for you disbelievers if your theory doesnt fit the facts there is a very good chance your theory is wrong willie buchta
Torque transfers on an extended axis undiminished? I really don't know - could well be. But I suspect what we're thinking, and what probably coaxed you to create this test, is that there is torsional flex in the extension which might diminish the torque being transferred to the nut. And you may not have disproved that.
Kudos for doing the work, Willie, but there remains a possibility, and I stress,
possibility, that there is a flaw in your test.
Your procedure started with the constant, the torque wrench without an extension. This established our benchmark - the marks you made on the nuts.
You then tested the wrench with an extension, and at the same reading, wound up with the marks lining up.
There is a potential variable not accounted for here - bolt stretch.
If the bolt stretched on the first procedure, the second procedure
could coincidentally replicate the results of your benchmark with less actual
applied torque to the nut. By reversing the procedure - extension first, no extension second - you'll have eliminated the potential stretch variable, possibly proven its existence, discovered that flex in the extension may have an effect on the clamping pressure, or simply opened the worm can even further.
In the end, there probably isn't a gnat's nads worth of difference, but a truer test might be to use plastigage between two machined pieces being bolted together, because what we're really trying to discover is clamping pressure, not where a nut indexes with respect to a bolt.
And yes, I'm out of plastigage.
Dr. Willie, thanks for getting me thinking - I am grateful for that!
Respectfully yours,
Chris Conrad