Landracing Forum Home
May 21, 2013, 10:46:29 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
BACK TO LANDRACING.COM HOMEPAGE
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  

(Note: Donations are not tax deductible)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Rear Engine Modified Roadster Build  (Read 83345 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
SPARKY
Global Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 70
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3624




« Reply #30 on: March 09, 2009, 02:01:15 PM »

Righ now there is a part of my shop that is exactly what we are doing Dan   grin  Andy and I sometimes get behind the process  grin and have to use full beers instead of empties---if you are ever in Phoenix we would welcome your help with the design process!!!!!  lol   cheers
Logged

WORDS to build by!
"--virtually the entire success of a turbo/engine system lies in thermal managemant."
 Corky Bell   MAXIMUM BOOST

" I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts." A. Lincoln

agendadocumentary.com
saltfever
Guest

« Reply #31 on: March 09, 2009, 02:34:24 PM »

I agree with Dan in that the fun part of it all is the fabrication and decision making in the shop. smiley On the other hand some wonderful CAD and Engineering tools have have been developed and been significantly lowered in price in recent years. If affordable, I would rather get a FEA (finite element analysis) look at the cage before a real life event!
Logged
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #32 on: March 09, 2009, 04:20:11 PM »

The big benefit for us is using the models to do the FEA and CFD work. Especially on the FEA work on the cage, like saltfever mentioned "I would rather get a FEA (finite element analysis) look at the cage before a real life event!"  There are some ideas that we want to try out before we start cutting pipe.  Tony
Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #33 on: March 10, 2009, 06:29:23 PM »

Finally the suspension design is done and we are very happy with the geometry outcome. The castor, kingpin, scrub, trail, camber curve and bump steer all look really good. The steering arm is double sheer for added insurance.  Since we went with spindle mounts, Rich Bogart (Bogart Wheels) had to re design the front hubs to get the upright to fit properly.

Something I never thought of but Rich bought it my attention that most aluminum rims aren’t designed for the tire pressures that LSR cars run (60PSI plus) and are prone to cracking and should be checked annually. 

If we don’t get spring fever from all the beautiful weather we have been having, some more might get done.

Drawing by Steve Conover
Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
saltfever
Guest

« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2009, 11:52:44 PM »

B e a u t i f u l  design by Steve. smiley 

Tony, any chance we could link to the solid model somehow so we can play with it? Sometimes a "viewer" can be downloaded from the CAD OEM to allow review or manipulation by others without the ability to alter the data. If the intellectual property could be protected it would be quite educational or helpful to understand the various geometry. TIA  smiley
Logged
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #35 on: March 11, 2009, 12:27:40 PM »

saltfever, Let me check if it can be done without giving up any of the IP.

I received a few PM's on if the upright was an off the shelf part.  The upright is designed to fit inside the wheel (15 x3 1/2) without protruding out of the inside cover.  The spindle is an off the shelf part from Pro Works that is welded to the upright.  Tony



Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
Sumner
Global Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 69
Location: Blanding, Utah
Posts: 2840


Blanding, Ut..a small dot in the middle of nowhere


WWW
« Reply #36 on: March 11, 2009, 02:52:23 PM »

......... The spindle is an off the shelf part from Pro Works that is welded to the upright.  Tony.

Tony do you have a link to that spindle?  What hub can be used with it?

Thanks and it looks like a great project,

Sum
Logged

maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #37 on: March 11, 2009, 05:03:41 PM »

Sum, The spindle came from the Chassis Shop. http://secure.chassisshop.com/pdf/Steering-Controls-1.4.pdf Its on page 48 at the bottom.  It will work with any Anglia hub or Anglia hub and wheel combo.  On ours we had machine  the hub about 1/4" to clear the inside part of the upright.  Tony
Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
krusty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 172




Ignore
« Reply #38 on: March 13, 2009, 09:53:27 AM »

You can do this:     go to the site   www.solidworks.com.  Scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on   eDrawings  under FREE CAD TOOLS.   Download the free program   SolidworksViewer    for either the PC or Mac.    Then, if Tony sends you the file(s) as .dwg files, you will be able to manipulate them without being able to alter the file content. We also used Solidworks to design our new chassis and our engineer shared design progress with me via emails with zipped files. Solidworks is especially suited to finding out how parts will fit in available space(s), but a PITA to generate framework plans that you can cut pipe off of.     vic
Logged
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #39 on: March 13, 2009, 09:14:09 PM »

The reader is available, but trying to do it without giving up the Intellectual Property  (IP) is what we are working on.  Vic, I know what you mean about Solidworks, that's why I am  going to draw the frame using  Unigraphics NX. 

After running the CFD program, we had to move the front wheels out further from the body (moved them around till we found the optimal spot for this car) as it was a choke point for the air.  This made the A arms longer,  and doing the FEA  showed that the arms had to be re designed.  Their isn't a big change on top, but the lower arm is now billet and two pieces.  Tony

Removed the wrong picture.  I will add the correct one soon.

Design by Steve Conover
« Last Edit: March 13, 2009, 11:31:45 PM by maguromic » Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
1212FBGS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 52
Location: Vista, Ca
Posts: 2514


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #40 on: March 14, 2009, 12:31:22 AM »

how far out did ya wind up moving the wheels? are you doing the CFD? I'm having a problem with the students and my CFD stuff..
Kent
Logged
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #41 on: March 15, 2009, 11:23:39 AM »

how far out did ya wind up moving the wheels? are you doing the CFD? I'm having a problem with the students and my CFD stuff..
Kent



Originally we had the wheels about 4" from the body, after playing around with the CFD program, we found the optimal spot to be 6" from the body.  One caveat, this is  optimal for our nose, body shape (cowl forward), suspension and front aero strategy.  It will be different on other cars with different parameters.  I didn't do the CFD work, another one of the usual suspects working on the build did.  If you want I can ask him for you. I know with the ALMS race season going, he is not here that much, so he might not be able to work at a fast pace on it. Tony
« Last Edit: March 15, 2009, 11:32:30 AM by maguromic » Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #42 on: March 22, 2009, 07:47:26 PM »

Haven't had much to update till now, but here is the updated rear setup.  Originally we were going to have duel inboard brakes. But when we ran the numbers we didn't see any benefit, only the extra drag and difficulty in changing gear ratios. It was decided to go back to outboard brakes. The rear is drawn with a GMC block as that's the only drawing I had, but it will be set up for C, D and E motor plates.  If any of the guys working on the car wants to run a  AA engine it will also have the room.  The four bars going toward the driver are there just for alignment purposes and will not be in the frame drawing. 




Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
krusty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 172




Ignore
« Reply #43 on: March 22, 2009, 08:16:49 PM »

Looks good, Tony. Makes me skeered to post pics of our new, somewhat old school/primitive RMR (but I'm gonna do it soon as I get the pics uploaded to Photobucket)   vic
Logged
maguromic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 1628



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #44 on: March 22, 2009, 08:30:34 PM »

Looks good, Tony. Makes me skeered to post pics of our new, somewhat old school/primitive RMR (but I'm gonna do it soon as I get the pics uploaded to Photobucket)   vic

Vic, I have seen your handy work in IMSA and Trans-Am.  Anything your are involved with is very far from primitive. Post some pics of that car. cheers  As far is this build, its just some of your old friends from Gloy's trying to have some fun.Tony
Logged

“If you haven’t seen the future, you are not going fast enough”
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 08, 2013, 06:58:16 AM