Author Topic: Supercharger stageing, compounding,  (Read 35038 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jl222

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2957
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #60 on: May 06, 2009, 12:51:37 AM »
 
  Bvillercr will be posting some fotos when he gets a chance of some Pratt and Whitney two stage super chargers of WW11.
  Both show the superchargers for the R2800 radial engine. One for the 10W series [the W stands for water injection or ADI]
 and the other the 32W series. Check out those twin sidewinder centrifugal blowers that went to intercoolers and back to the carb and
 into the blower at back of engine. Total of THREE superchargers and they were two speed also, including the 10W.
   All those years racing without intercoolers.

     JL222 :cheers:



« Last Edit: May 06, 2009, 12:55:42 AM by jl222 »

Offline bvillercr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2291
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #61 on: May 06, 2009, 10:20:46 AM »
Pictures as promised.








Offline jl222

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2957
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #62 on: May 06, 2009, 12:41:46 PM »
 
 The top foto showing the air flow from first stage supercharger is only one side, the same setup was on other side
of airplane. Its hard to make out but airflow from the intercoolers went through carb then to second supercharger
were the air was compressed a second time. These blowers were also two speeds.
 Some aero superchargers were three and four speeds.
 We have a lot of catching up to do. This technology is 65 years old or more!!

    JL222
 

McRat

  • Guest
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #63 on: May 06, 2009, 02:56:52 PM »
It might be old tech, but huge amounts of development dollars were spent on it.  IIRC, the B-29 program was one of the most expensive projects in the history of the US (corrected for inflation), I think it cost more than the Manhattan Project.   How much went into engines development?  Dunno.

Offline floydjer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4250
  • "There is no duck side of the moon..."
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #64 on: January 04, 2010, 09:10:10 AM »
This thread looked lonely so...........I did some research on compound supercharging and found a site claiming the Wankel rotary was originally designed to be used as a supercharger. Wonder if one has been adapted for that use and the result. :?
I`d never advocate drugs,alcohol,violence or insanity to anyone...But they work for me.

Offline SPARKY

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6912
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #65 on: January 04, 2010, 10:21:21 AM »
I don't see why not, in a lot of ways the Wankle is a lot like the DeLaval slide vane vacum pump we had on the dairy.
Miss LIBERTY,  changing T.K.I.  to noise, dust, rust, BLUE HATS & hopefully not scrap!!

"Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure or nothing."   Helen Keller

We are going to explore the racing N words NITROUS & NITRO!

Offline interested bystander

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 997
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #66 on: January 04, 2010, 10:51:08 AM »
FYI the 50cc Kreidler 140 mph plus record motorcycle of the mid 60's was Wankel supercharged.
5 mph in pit area (clothed)

Offline robfrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
    • carbinitelsr
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #67 on: January 07, 2010, 11:56:05 PM »
This is a great thread. Lots of deep thinking!
496 BGS
carbinitelsr.com
carbiniteracing.com
carbinite.com

Offline robfrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
    • carbinitelsr
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #68 on: January 08, 2010, 12:14:50 AM »
Has anyone ever tried to use a small turbine engine to power the supercharger? Would that be legal as the rules are written now?
496 BGS
carbinitelsr.com
carbiniteracing.com
carbinite.com

Offline robfrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1206
    • carbinitelsr
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #69 on: January 08, 2010, 12:22:43 AM »
BTW, the computer says that it takes 247 hp to spin our GT4718 turbos @23psi and 7k rpm on our 540.
I would love to get that back. Also I could open up camshaft duration / overlap and free up even more as back pressure would be eliminated.
496 BGS
carbinitelsr.com
carbiniteracing.com
carbinite.com

Offline RichFox

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2663
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #70 on: January 08, 2010, 09:03:54 AM »
Has anyone ever tried to use a small turbine engine to power the supercharger? Would that be legal as the rules are written now?
No.Aux power to drive the blower is not allowed.

Offline bbarn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #71 on: January 08, 2010, 03:02:07 PM »
Has anyone ever tried to use a small turbine engine to power the supercharger? Would that be legal as the rules are written now?
No.Aux power to drive the blower is not allowed.

No aux power in *ANY* class or is it allowed in the streamliner class?
I almost never wake up cranky, I usually just let her sleep in.

Offline RichFox

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2663
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #72 on: January 08, 2010, 03:11:15 PM »
Your blower must be driven by the same engine that drives the car See 4.FF...."powered by the primary engine"  No deal. You can't do it.

Offline Stan Back

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5885
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #73 on: January 08, 2010, 07:14:13 PM »
What if it's in a trailer?
Past (Only) Member of the San Berdoo Roadsters -- "California's Most-Exclusive Roadster Club" -- 19 Years of Bonneville and/or El Mirage Street Roadster Records

Offline jl222

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2957
Re: Supercharger stageing, compounding,
« Reply #74 on: January 08, 2010, 08:22:55 PM »
Your blower must be driven by the same engine that drives the car See 4.FF...."powered by the primary engine"  No deal. You can't do it.

  There could be an argument in AA streamliner or lakester as they are allowed multible engines AND the rule book states ''innovation is unlimited''

               JL222