Landracing Forum Home
May 19, 2013, 09:27:55 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
BACK TO LANDRACING.COM HOMEPAGE
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  

(Note: Donations are not tax deductible)
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: digital camera information please  (Read 2022 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Harold Bettes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 70
Location: High Country (7000'MSL)
Posts: 304


huntin' for signs




Ignore
« on: May 31, 2008, 07:19:52 PM »

Howdy All,

I have recently gained a Nikon CoolPix 950 digital camera to add to my camera bag and need some guidance for salt shots.

Most of my previous camera experience at Bonneville has been my old 35mm bag of Pentax stuff and I learned about the background problems and reflected light pretty quickly.

I wanted to get some digital shots of stuff as well and I came by the Nikon for freebies from one of my kids (they got a higher zoot Nikon piece). I have used the Nikon for taking pics for both my books, but nothing out on the salt yet and I want to reduce the learning curve if I can.

Any advice or quick guidance would help I think.

Thanks in advance.

Regards to All,
HB2 smiley
Logged

If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.
Peter Jack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 69
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2113





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2008, 07:43:32 PM »

Harold:

Follow up this link and check out white balance.

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikoncp950/page9.asp

Pete
Logged

My avatar shows Tok, a 100# Alaskan Malamute.
He's the one who runs everything around here.
Stainless1
Global Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 62
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 4421


Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele Wichita, Kansas



« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2008, 07:46:09 PM »

HB, most of the digitals are just point and shoot.  Some have manual modes, but unless you are a real creative person, it won't help a lot.  Go out in the snow and take some pictures, unless it is all gone, that will help with the pictures.  Do you know if your camera has a manual mode?
Logged

Stainless 
 MSA Lakester #1000 my fastest mile 245 and change, 84 ci turbobusa motor... but Corey's 233 MPH H/BFL record is still 3MPH faster than mine.
 Builder of Bike 278 1000cc APS-G,  Kids Red Hat Record 208.959 (old PS rules)
 Other kids A-G record 179.172  Josh O record 182.266
 Co-owner of the Amo Steele Streamliner, #1411... still sorting
Peter Jack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 69
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2113





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2008, 07:55:23 PM »

Stainless:

If you look at the pictures on Sum's website with my name on them they were shot with a Panasonic DMC FZ50 set for snow. There's a picture of your car but I believe it was under the canopy if I remember correctly. The snow setting worked like a dream.

Pete
Logged

My avatar shows Tok, a 100# Alaskan Malamute.
He's the one who runs everything around here.
Milwaukee Midget
Global Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 53
Location: Beerhaven, Wisconsin
Posts: 3158


If in doubt, it probably IS a mistake.



« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2008, 08:34:45 PM »

Hi, Harold -

My wife has the 7900 series Nikon, a darkroom in the basement, and has sold cameras, so she was my go-to girl on this.

You should be able to go into the exposure compensation setting and go plus a couple of stops, but she makes a good point - do some experiments and bracket some shots - you're not committed to film, and if you duck under someone's tent in the shade, you should be able to tell pretty quickly what's working and what's not.

Cheers, Chief!
Logged

"Information - we want - information"
Freud
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 81
Location: Everett, WA - USA
Posts: 4046




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2008, 10:00:22 PM »

The theory of the light meter still governs even a digital camera.

White, when metered, reflects 36% more light than the grey card, upon which exposure is based. That is a 2 stop correction.

The salt is very reflective. Contrast, on the shadow side, can be way less than is generally the case. If the automatic
exposure camera reads any subject that is darker than white, it will give an adequate exposure. If the reflectance from the
salt influences the exposure, you will be under exposed. An incident meter will show the normal exposure to be 3/4 to 1 stop less than at sea level. You are at 4300 feet and there is very little pollution out there. But, that is different than the white giving you an underexposed image.

It's just like tuning a fuel system. You have to know something about what you are doing but with digital cameras,
programs are available to bail yourself out when you don't know what you are doing.

The nice thing about auto exposure cameras is that if they mess up it's generally in the same direction all the time. Correction is not a huge problem.

Just shoot away. Someone can bail you out if u made mistakes.

FREUD
Logged

Since '63
Old Gringo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Age: 72
Location: Orange,Ca
Posts: 41


I only drive with the motor not running.




Ignore
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2008, 11:17:22 PM »

Howdy All,

I have recently gained a Nikon CoolPix 950 digital camera to add to my camera bag and need some guidance for salt shots.

Most of my previous camera experience at Bonneville has been my old 35mm bag of Pentax stuff and I learned about the background problems and reflected light pretty quickly.

I wanted to get some digital shots of stuff as well and I came by the Nikon for freebies from one of my kids (they got a higher zoot Nikon piece). I have used the Nikon for taking pics for both my books, but nothing out on the salt yet and I want to reduce the learning curve if I can.

Any advice or quick guidance would help I think.

Thanks in advance.

Regards to All,
HB2 smiley
HB2, I would sugest in addition to the other replies that you would need a digital polarizing filter. If you have ever tried polarized sunglasses you will understand. If not I sugest that you invest in both sunglasses and a filter for your viewing pleasure. For the salt, beach, high elevation and reflective surfaces, polarized is a must.
« Last Edit: June 01, 2008, 06:10:51 PM by Old Gringo » Logged

Ex Hound Dog Crew Chief. Retired Xeroid.
Dean Los Angeles
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 63
Location: Coarsegold
Posts: 2131




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: June 01, 2008, 11:55:28 AM »

You didn't make it clear if this is your first digital camera. No matter. What ever you have done in the past, you are not taking enough pictures. If you don't come back with more than a thousand you haven't even started.

With my first digital camera I took over 13,000 pictures. I stopped counting with the second.

I keep one battery on the charger in the car and change about mid day. Get a the largest memory card you can put in the camera. And a spare. It doesn't involve a lot of money.

The cost per thousand? Zero. Printing pictures does cost money, but you can sort out the best of the bunch.
Uploading ALL of the pictures for everyone to see . . . Priceless.
Logged

Well, it used to be Los Angeles . . . 50 miles north of Fresno now.
Just remember . . . It isn't life or death.
It's bigger than life or death! It's RACING.
Harold Bettes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 70
Location: High Country (7000'MSL)
Posts: 304


huntin' for signs




Ignore
« Reply #8 on: June 01, 2008, 01:34:36 PM »

Hey Guys, grin

Thanks for all the good suggestions and recommendations. shocked

I have used digital cameras before but always on much easier subject material than opportunity shots at Bonneville. Your suggestions have made the pathway a lot more easy to travel. cool

Thanks again. grin grin grin

Regards to All,
HB2
Logged

If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.
Old Gringo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Age: 72
Location: Orange,Ca
Posts: 41


I only drive with the motor not running.




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: June 01, 2008, 06:09:13 PM »

Howdy All,

I have recently gained a Nikon CoolPix 950 digital camera to add to my camera bag and need some guidance for salt shots.

Most of my previous camera experience at Bonneville has been my old 35mm bag of Pentax stuff and I learned about the background problems and reflected light pretty quickly.

I wanted to get some digital shots of stuff as well and I came by the Nikon for freebies from one of my kids (they got a higher zoot Nikon piece). I have used the Nikon for taking pics for both my books, but nothing out on the salt yet and I want to reduce the learning curve if I can.

Any advice or quick guidance would help I think.

Thanks in advance.

Regards to All,
HB2 smiley
HB2, I would sugest in addition to the other replies that you would need a digital polarizing filter. If you have ever tried polarized sunglasses you will understand. If not I sugest that you invest in both sunglasses and a filter for your viewing pleasure. For the salt, beach, high elevation and reflective surfaces, polarized is a must.
Logged

Ex Hound Dog Crew Chief. Retired Xeroid.
Freud
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 81
Location: Everett, WA - USA
Posts: 4046




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2008, 11:52:25 PM »

A polarizer is fine unless you use a rather wide angle lens.

FREUD
Logged

Since '63
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 02, 2013, 12:43:22 PM