Poll

Please vote Yea or Nay or New Motion

Yea
21 (77.8%)
Nay
2 (7.4%)
New Motion
4 (14.8%)

Total Members Voted: 21

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: Partial Streamling rule addition  (Read 17963 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline k.h.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 565
Re: Partial Streamling rule addition
« Reply #60 on: October 17, 2007, 12:36:44 PM »
Is this "hack the fairing" decision by the same folks behind the "all cow all the time" rule (while road racers go 200 mph all year round with fabric inserts) and the OEM engine requirement in MPS that mysteriously protects a few softish records of large and un-aerodynamic riders?  Does the rules committee enjoy all the feedback? 
Logged
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.  But in practice, there is.--Jan L. A. Van de Snepscheut

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: Partial Streamling rule addition
« Reply #61 on: October 17, 2007, 12:58:59 PM »
Current MC tech policy seems to be "If I close my eyes, you can't see me."
Logged
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

aswracing

  • Guest
Re: Partial Streamling rule addition
« Reply #62 on: October 17, 2007, 01:06:47 PM »
What's the process for changing the people that are on the MC Rules committee? Is there a vote or something? Or are they appointed?
Logged

Offline k.h.

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 565
Re: Partial Streamling rule addition
« Reply #63 on: October 17, 2007, 01:33:42 PM »
Anointed?
« Last Edit: October 17, 2007, 01:54:23 PM by k.h. »
Logged
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.  But in practice, there is.--Jan L. A. Van de Snepscheut

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8964
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: Partial Streamling rule addition
« Reply #64 on: October 17, 2007, 01:42:58 PM »
OK everyone, only a couple of days until we find out if there is a different interpretation at EM, whether it be old one, new one or another one. 
Hopefully the SCTA will sooner or later post something on the OFFICIAL website.  I will be interested in seeing if the bikes from past EM pictures are butchered in the new pictures or allowed to run in the newly illegal configuration...
Logged
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline Nortonist 592

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
    • http://www.artfv.com/design/fashion/
Re: Partial Streamling rule addition
« Reply #65 on: October 17, 2007, 05:10:16 PM »
"Hopefully the SCTA will sooner or later post something on the OFFICIAL website."


I'll bet later.  Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay later.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2007, 05:12:30 PM by Nortonist 592 »
Logged
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »