Author Topic: pro's and cons  (Read 10726 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hawkwind

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
pro's and cons
« on: March 19, 2007, 03:25:32 AM »
what are the pros and cons of  ,rear,cntr and front  driver positions in stream liners ,
Gary  clueless in oz
slower than most

Offline 1212FBGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
    • http://www.motobody.com
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2007, 03:36:56 AM »
well if its a jet powered liner you'll probably want to set in the front.... :-o

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2007, 04:02:32 AM »
Did Kent get up early or stay up late ?

A vehicle that puts the driver last in the chain of events will have the advantage of the best line of sight and driver feel.
The down side is that all the inside fluids that can go outside in case of a failure tend to want to go into your path of vision.

A driver in the center has just less visual reference as to the position of the vehicle and the problems related to the power plant in the front or the rear will be the same either way.

If the driver is the first thing down the road, they have the least ability to sight down the vehicle and is subject to be the last to know if they are out of shape.

A front position bike liner actually has some advantage over an equally placed car operator because they have the lean angle in relation to the horizon as an additional visual clue.

Isolation of the driver via fire wall and fresh air are all equally important with challenges that are often misunderstood and overlooked.
 
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline 1212FBGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
    • http://www.motobody.com
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2007, 04:08:58 AM »
had to take the dog out to pee... goin back to bed...you should 2 mr smarty pants

Offline Speed Limit 1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2007, 05:21:34 AM »
Jack, You still up drinking, or just too old to waste your life sleeping.
John Gowetski, red hat @ 221.183 MPH MSA Lakester, Bockscar #1000 60 ci normally aspirated w/N20

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2007, 06:12:23 AM »
Jack, You still up drinking, or just too old to waste your life sleeping.
Well I don't drink and my time is my own.  LOL
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline Richard Thomason

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 421
    • http://www.dannyboystreamliner.com
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2007, 12:17:09 PM »
I believe that Jack has hit all the salient points with respect to driver position. You pays your money and takes your choice. Just don't underestimate the difficulty of driving. it's not as easy as it would seem.

Online tortoise

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 685
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2007, 01:19:13 PM »
On the other hand, the lowest drag airfoil shape is widest near the front, narrowing to the rear. If the cockpit is the widest part of the vehicle, and arguably it should be, it should be nearer the front. Cars with the driver ahead of the front wheels are really spooky, though.

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2007, 01:27:26 PM »
A good place to start is to find the narrowest driver. LOL
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline sockjohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2007, 02:06:02 PM »
On the other hand, the lowest drag airfoil shape is widest near the front, narrowing to the rear. If the cockpit is the widest part of the vehicle, and arguably it should be, it should be nearer the front. Cars with the driver ahead of the front wheels are really spooky, though.

I know that there are at least a few laminar flow airfoils where the widest part is at about 50-60% of the chord width.  I'll try to dig up more details later in case anyone is interested.

There may very well be non-laminar flow airfoils with the same feature, I just don't know of any.

I'm not even going to address the issue of laminar versus non-laminar.

Not producing lift is good too.

Offline JackD

  • NOBODY'S FOOL
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4684
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2007, 03:25:50 PM »
Aero downforce is good for a lot of things in LSR, but get it sideways and flying won't be any trouble it will be the landing. :wink:
"I would rather lose going fast enough to win than win going slow enough to lose."
"That horrible smell is dirty feet being held to the fire"

Offline sockjohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2007, 06:57:03 PM »
Aero downforce is good for a lot of things in LSR, but get it sideways and flying won't be any trouble it will be the landing. :wink:

As somebody who has glider time, I can say landings are easy - you will land!  Some landings are bumpier than others however.   :-D

Good old P-51 airfoil looks pretty deep, as well as the GAW.
Please note the figure 2 shows the % as the point the flow becomes non-laminar, not the point of maximum chord.
http://www.dreesecode.com/primer/airfoil5.htm

This from the link alludes to why I think we're as well off with non-laminar airfoils.  This doesn't even factor in cutting holes for wheels and break lines for canopies. 
"Consider the builder?s ability to control the wing contour during construction and flight. The surfaces of metal airplanes tend to ?oilcan? during flight and this can change the contour enough to trip the boundary layer.

When using composites, it?s important to keep close tolerances on the airfoil contour. Contour control of a surface isn?t just a step-height allowance; it depends on the chord length that it occurs over. Aluminum? Forget about it."

Online tortoise

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 685
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2007, 07:26:49 PM »
As somebody who has glider time, I can say landings are easy - you will land!  Some landings are bumpier than others however.   :-D
As a great actor said on his deathbed, dying is easy -- comedy is hard.

Offline Speed Limit 1000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2007, 12:46:31 AM »
A good place to start is to find the narrowest driver. LOL

But then you don't have the ballast or the steering dampener built into the driver, you would have to add them.
John Gowetski, red hat @ 221.183 MPH MSA Lakester, Bockscar #1000 60 ci normally aspirated w/N20

Offline RidgeRunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 843
Re: pro's and cons
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2007, 10:12:07 AM »
     Not only do you lose visual line-of-sight the closer you sit to the front wheels, you also lose the seat-of-the-pants feel because you are closer to the pivot point as the back starts to come around.  Found that out one of the first times I drove a van on snow, almost sideways before I felt a thing...............