Author Topic: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I  (Read 25898 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

landracing

  • Guest
Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« on: December 02, 2006, 06:56:42 PM »
Here group is a list of rule changes for the 2007 Racing Year.

****************************************

2007 Rules Changes
Following is a partial list of changes to be made to Sections 1, 2 and 3 of the 2007 SCTA rulebook. These changes are a result of the SCTA Board of Directors vote at the Dec. 1, 2006 meeting. There were 16 members of the 17 person board present at the meeting. Steve Tollar was at home recovering from recent surgery. President Mike Manghelli would cast a vote only in the case of a deadlock on an item. The final vote for Sections 4, 5 and 7 will done at the Jan. 5, 2007 board meeting.

Words in bold type face indicate changes.

Dan Warner
dwarner230@yahoo.com

SECTION 1   GENERAL COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
Page 7
1. B   CLASSIFICATION:   For _15 _      Against _0_
Proposals for the creation of new classes will discussed at even year rule meetings for implementation in odd year rulebooks only, i.e. 2007, 2009, 2011, etc.

Page 8
1. E   COURSE:      For _15_      Against _0_
New last sentence
All new vehicles shall not exceed 175MPH or a speed as determined by the technical committee on the first run. All new vehicles shall deploy the parachute, if equipped, on the first run. A new vehicle sticker will be endorsed by the starter following the successful completion of the requirement.

Page 10
1. H   RECORD BODY AND CLASS  CERTIFICATION:   For _15_      Against _0_
Add new last paragraph
After a new record has been established and there is a question as to the legality of the vehicle the Board of Directors has the authority to place the record on hold or reverse the record.

1.I   PROTESTS:      For _13_         Against _2_
Clarification of 3rd and 4th sentence, 1st paragraph
All protests require a fee of $100.00.  This fee is refundable if the protest is upheld, if the protest is denied the fee is forfeited to the SCTA Treasurer.   

SECTION 2   COMPETITION  REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Page 14
2.A    ENGINES:      For _15_      Against _0_
Insert before last sentence in 1st paragraph:
For any engine to be considered for cubic inch (cc) requirements, the engine shall have contributed to the propulsion of the vehicle.

Page 15
Flathead Vintage Four (V4F)   For _15_      Against _0_
Rewrite of engine class description
Flathead Vintage Four (V4F) consists of any pre-1935 originally designed and American made flathead four cylinder automotive production engine, up to 220 cubic inches displacement. The engine shall have been produced as a valve in block engine, with the camshaft in the same location as produced, (in the block). Only flathead type cylinder heads, valve in block, are allowed. No specialty OHV or OHC conversion cylinder heads are allowed.
 
Page 15
ENGINE CLASS BREAK      For _15_      Against _0_
Adjust the liter equivalent to be the actual size.
   Cubic Inch Displ.   Liter Equiv.
AA   501.00 cid and over   (8.210 liters and over)
A   440.00 thru 500.99 cid   (7.210 to 8.209 L)
B   373.00 thru 439.99 cid   (6.112 to 7.209 L)
C   306.00 thru 372.99 cid   (5.015 to 6.111 L)
D   261.00 thru 305.99 cid   (4.277 to 5.014 L)
E   184.00 thru 260.99 cid   (3.015 to 4.276 L)
F   123.00 thru 183.99cid   (2.016 to 3.014 L)
G   93.00 thru 122.99 cid   (1.524 to 2.015 L)
H   62.00 thru 92.99 cid   (1.016 to 1.523 L)
I   46.00 thru 61.99 cid   (0.754 to 1.015 L)
J   31.00 thru 45.99 cid   (0.508 to 0.753 L)
K   up to 30.99 cid       (0.507 L and under)

Page 15  Vintage Engine Restrictions      For _15_      Against _0_
Add bullet items 3 and 4
   3. Electronic Fuel Injection prohibited
4. Any ignition system may be used.

Page 16               For _15_      Against _0_
Add new sentence to end of paragraph at the top of the page
Cubic inch to liter conversion shall be computed by the formula: ci/61.024 = liter.

Page 20
2.P   FOUR WHEEL DRIVE:
Housekeeping
Delete the following:
A ?Grandfather Clause? will cover vehicles competing in a category other than Special Construction or Production with a four-wheel drive system prior to 01/01/93.  These vehicles are:
   #259 F/G Roadster
   Owned by Jim and Chris Hill, Rancho Cordova, CA
   #327 F/G Roadster
   Owned by Gary McArthur, Lomis, CA
   #505 F/G Roadster
   Owned by Nancy Deeds, Burbank, CA
   #774 F/G Roadster
   Owned by Bob Noice, Sun Valley, CA
These vehicles may compete only until 01/01/2007. Prior to 01/01/2007 if one of these vehicles changes ownership it must be converted to two-wheel drive in order to continue in SCTA competition.

Page 21         For _9_      Against _6_
2.Q.1   TRACTION CONTROL:
   Delete Paragraph 2.Q.1
 

SECTION 3   TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATIONS & REQUIREMENTS

Page 22
3.A.3   Driver?s Helmet Support:   For _11_      Against _0_
Rewrite of this section, previously titled (neck collar)
SFI 38.1 spec is for a Hans type device
A helmet support system shall be used in all vehicles.
?   Forward movement: SFI 38.1 systems are encouraged however, they shall be ?engineered? as an integral part of the entire restraint system inclusive of the seat, safety harness and roll structure.
?   Lateral Movement: The existing structure shall provide restriction to lateral head movement of less than 2? per side by January 2008.  (See section 3.B.1)
?   Rear Movement: See section 3.C

Page 25            For _14_      Against _0_
Rewrite to reflect the 2? lateral support requirement
3.C   HEAD REST:
A padded head rest shall be installed in all vehicles to prevent whiplash. All drivers shall have the padding within 2? of the back of the helmet.

3.D   DRIVER RESTRAINTS
3.D.1   Seats:            For _14_      Against _0_
Rewrite  paragraph
All vehicles shall use a seat designed for racing. It shall be made of a metal, alloy or composite material (No  ?plastic? seats allowed beginning January 2008), securely mounted seat and can have a maximum of 1? padding. Sprung or compressible seats are prohibited.  Seats shall be securely installed and braced to prevent rearward collapse. Seat tracks shall be bolted or pinned to prevent movement.

3.D.2   Seat Belts:         For _15_      Against ___
Rewrite paragraph
Seat belts meeting SFI specification 16.1 quick-release competition type seat belts and shoulder harness, with 3? lap belt, 3? shoulder belts (unless designed to meet the installation requirements of a helmet support system, SFI 38.1) and 2? crotch strap are mandatory in all categories. All seat belt and shoulder harness installations shall be mutually compatible, originally designed to be used with each other.  All belts shall be in good condition, have a manufacturer?s tag with a legible date not more than 5 years old on the label.  It is recommended that seats belts be upgraded every two to three years.

Seat belts and shoulder harnesses should be installed to the manufacturers? specifications and in compliance with the helmet support system requirements, if used.


Page 23/24
Housekeeping/clarification
3.B    ROLL CAGES
Replace current diagrams, possibly from the SFI Specifications.   Committee to change

Page 24
3.B.1   ROLL CAGES:      For _15_      Against _0_
Rewrite 2nd sentence, first paragraph to read:
All roll cage structures shall be designed to protect the driver from any angle, including the bottom and the rear.

Page 27/28
3.D.3   Arm/Leg Restraints:   For _15_      Against _0_
Rewrite 3rd paragraph, 2nd sentence on page 28 to read:
To meet this requirement it shall be necessary to have arm restraints and a ?full? door net or a combination of restraint systems that would be the equivalent to a ?full? door net.

Add new next sentence
All door net mounting bars must not be flexible and be attached with a positive locking system, e.g. seat belt hardware.

Page 31
3.0 FLYWHEELS, FLYWHEEL SHIELDS, and BELL HOUSINGS:    For _15_      Against _0_
Rewrite section, includes SFI specs for available products
All cars, including rear engine cars, with non-automatic transmissions, shall be equipped as follows:
?   Flywheels ? No cast iron/cast aluminum flywheels shall be permitted.
?   Flywheel Shields ? Flywheel shields shall be SFI Spec 6.1, 6.2 or 6.3 depending on the application, or an SCTA approved flywheel shield, made from ?? thick steel, providing 3600 coverage and constructed in such a manner to provide retention of flywheel and clutch assembly parts, may be used in the event an after market flywheel shield is not available for the particular engine being used.
On cars where no after market flywheel shield is currently available, and on smaller cars with limited space to install either an SFI or SCTA approved flywheel shield, an SFI Spec 4.1 blanket specifically manufactured to be used as a flywheel blanket (shield) may be used.
?   Bell housings ? Cars utilizing bell housing engine mounts only (Corvair, VW, etc.) must provide some additional method of retaining the engine in the car.
 
Page 32
3.Q   FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS:   For _15_      Against _0_
Rewrite the annual inspection requirement, falls into line with other groups
A current inspection/filling certification (no more than 24 months old) for each agent bottle shall be visible to the technical inspector without removing the bottle.

Page 33
Housekeeping
Delete the photo and identification info for the Flame Out steel bottles

Page 34
3.S   DRIVE LINES:         For _14_      Against _0_
Rewrite 2nd sentence to read:
In all cars with drive shafts (section 4.II) there shall be provided with a 360 degree metal sling (at least ?? x 1?), attached securely and mounted in the front 25% of the driveshaft to prevent dropping or excessive whipping in the event of breakage of the driveshaft or universal joints

Page 35
3.U   WINDOWS AND WINDSHIELDS:      For _15_      Against _0_
Rewrite 1st sentence, 3rd paragraph to read:
All vehicles must have all non-laminated safety glass windows and headlights covered with safety film.
 

**************************




Dan,

Initial look thru the thing that caught my eye the most is the deletion of 2.Q.1

This is the Traction Control paragraph. What is this implying????

I did not see anywhere else where it says you cannot run Traction Control???

Jon
« Last Edit: December 03, 2006, 02:10:43 PM by landracing »

Offline desotoman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2006, 07:19:49 PM »
They basically said if we cannot police it we have to delete it. They were  worried about looking bad if someone filed a protest and it metioned Traction Control.
 
Tom G.
I love the USA. How much longer will we be a free nation?

Asking questions is one's only way of getting answers.

The rational person lets verified facts form or modify his opinion.  The ideologue ignores verified facts which don't fit his preconceived opinions.

landracing

  • Guest
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2006, 07:33:51 PM »
Tom,

Is that actually saying, or softly saying it is legal.?

Jon

Offline desotoman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2006, 07:43:42 PM »
Jon,
  I would guess if it is no longer metioned in the Rule book, then it would be (I never thought I would ever say this in my lifetime) legal.
Tom G.
I love the USA. How much longer will we be a free nation?

Asking questions is one's only way of getting answers.

The rational person lets verified facts form or modify his opinion.  The ideologue ignores verified facts which don't fit his preconceived opinions.

JohnR

  • Guest
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2006, 07:50:45 PM »
Jon,
  I would guess if it is no longer metioned in the Rule book, then it would be (I never thought I would ever say this in my lifetime) legal.
Tom G.

Tom, you could also say that it is no longer illegal, if that makes it go down easier!

Offline desotoman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2006, 08:07:09 PM »
John,
   This will never go down easy for me. The guys that can't drive now got a level playing field. Now I will shut up before I say something I will regret.
Tom G.
I love the USA. How much longer will we be a free nation?

Asking questions is one's only way of getting answers.

The rational person lets verified facts form or modify his opinion.  The ideologue ignores verified facts which don't fit his preconceived opinions.

Offline bbb

  • Aerodynamically Challenged
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 296
  • JorNic Motorsports
    • JorNic Motorsports, Charlottesville, Va.
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2006, 09:15:52 PM »
in regards to:

Quote
Page 8
1. E   COURSE:      For _15_      Against _0_
New last sentence
All new vehicles shall not exceed 175MPH or a speed as determined by the technical committee on the first run. All new vehicles shall deploy the parachute, if equipped, on the first run. A new vehicle sticker will be endorsed by the starter following the successful completion of the requirement.

if a vehicle has been over 175mph at an ECTA event, and was new when that pass was made, how does this apply to this new rule? or is vehicle and driver licensing different requiring a <175mph pass on the salt regardless of history at Maxton? thanks.

dwarner

  • Guest
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2006, 09:33:22 PM »
We have to keep in mind that the salt is different than other venues.

The SCTA rulebook applies to Bonneville and El Mirage only. If the rule states that you have to run <175 on the first pass at Bonnevillle regardless of previous accomplishments then you gotta do it. A first time rider to the salt would like to know what the surface conditions are, IMHO.

DW

dwarner

  • Guest
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2006, 09:39:59 PM »
Yes, traction control systems are now allowed across the board. I think that this issue is now at rest, let's move on.

DW

dwarner

  • Guest
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2006, 09:41:48 PM »
Well Ok,

One more post regards this item. The rule does not say you must use it, your record may vary.

Does that sound like a Jackism?

DW

Offline hitz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 332
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #10 on: December 03, 2006, 01:54:30 AM »
Dan,
  The crotch strap I have installed in my lakester is 3" and the rule (old and new) calls for a 2" strap. It came as a 6 way system and I used one leg strap as a crotch strap. Just rolled up the other strap and stowed it underneath the one used as a crotch strap. If I can't get a 2" strap, is a 3" Ok?

  The back of my helmet is about 1" from the SFI roll bar padding on two vertical roll cage tubes. Would this satisfy the requirement of the pad mentioned? I'll try to send a picture.

  I'm computer savvy deprived so not sure about the picture.

  Thanks, Harvey

dwarner

  • Guest
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #11 on: December 03, 2006, 08:27:08 PM »
If I can't get a 2" strap, is a 3" Ok?

Rules in the book are minimums. A 3" strap will be OK.

DW

Offline saltsho1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2006, 03:56:26 PM »
  In referance to page 22,  3A3:  Since the title was changed from neck collar and it is not mentioned does it mean that we will not be able to use the collar under our helmets and need to go to a differant set-up, like or simular to the Hans device?

Offline jimmy six

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2787
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2006, 05:34:30 PM »
As I understand it, helmet side to side movement shall be no more than 4" total. A Hans type of head restraint system is "encouraged" but at this time not required. It shall be an "engineered" unit for the expliciate use of forward head restraint to be used inconjunction with other drivers restraints. ie: your belts, helmet, etc.

Mike Cook has described, shown, and used may brands. He encouraged us all to look them up for ourselves and see what best fits our own needs in our specific vehicles. The SCTA has always been in the forfront of safety while trying not to direct it's members to any specific brands. We all encourage the racers to use those who support our sport by advertising in the rulebook and programs.

I specifically asked about the neck collar and it will still be able to be worn. But if you purchase a type of head/neck restraint device, I do not know if that company would want you to wear a collar. Good Luck
First GMC 6 powered Fuel roadster over 200, with 2 red hats. Pit crew for Patrick Tone's Super Stock #49 Camaro

Offline Sumner

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4078
  • Blanding, Ut..a small dot in the middle of nowhere
    • http://purplesagetradingpost.com/sumner/sumnerindex.html
Re: Rule Changes for 2007 Part I
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2006, 06:06:18 PM »
As I understand it, helmet side to side movement shall be no more than 4" total. A Hans type of head restraint system is "encouraged" but at this time not required. It shall be an "engineered" unit for the expliciate use of forward head restraint to be used inconjunction with other drivers restraints. ie: your belts, helmet, etc......

JD thanks for clearing that up some.  That is what I thought it meant, but the way the rule is written it seems to give the impression you need a HANS device.  I was talking to someone else about this and the confusing part to some is that the "neck collar" was not required before unless lateral movement was more than 4 inches and now it has to be under 4 inches like you stated.

Dan I have a suggestion and take it for what it is worth.  Right now the rule is written as follows:

"Page 22
3.A.3   Driver?s Helmet Support:   For _11_      Against _0_
Rewrite of this section, previously titled (neck collar)
SFI 38.1 spec is for a Hans type device
A helmet support system shall be used in all vehicles.
?   Forward movement: SFI 38.1 systems are encouraged however, they shall be
?engineered? as an integral part of the entire restraint system inclusive of the seat, safety
harness and roll structure.
?   Lateral Movement: The existing structure shall provide restriction to lateral head
movement of less than 2? per side by January 2008.  (See section 3.B.1)
?   Rear Movement: See section 3.C"

Since Lateral movement and rear movement are describe why do you need "A helmet support system shall be used in all vehicles."  I think this leads the reader to think a HANS device or something similar is required and I don't think it is, is it??

Move the "SFI 38.1 spec is for a Hans type device" to after where you talk about a Hans type advice being "encouraged" but not required.

I would word it:

helmet support shall meet the following requirements:
?   Lateral Movement: The existing structure shall provide restriction to lateral head
movement of less than 2? per side by January 2008.  (See section 3.B.1)
?   Rear Movement: See section 3.C
?   Forward movement: SFI 38.1 systems are encouraged however, they shall be
?engineered? as an integral part of the entire restraint system inclusive of the seat, safety harness and roll structure. SFI 38.1 spec is for a Hans type device

c ya,

Sum