Author Topic: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?  (Read 17139 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline deep in debt motorsports

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 43
  • Location: Manteca Ca
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2018, 03:33:52 PM »
My G-Force arm restraints have the adjusters like shown,single piece.I just clip one end to Simpson suit and other end to belts.I don’t use the part that goes around arm so I think I am still legal?Part #471-4087 adubk at jegs
#327 C/GR

Offline CTRon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Age: 42
  • Location: connecticut
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2018, 08:17:27 PM »
My G-Force arm restraints have the adjusters like shown,single piece.I just clip one end to Simpson suit and other end to belts.I don’t use the part that goes around arm so I think I am still legal?Part #471-4087 adubk at jegs

Interesting.. have you run bville before with that setup? I have sown in rings in my jacket too an if they will allow this ill get the same ones
maxton 2 club member 205.188mph  A/BFR
loring 2 club member 219.807mph  A/BFR
Wilmington 2 club member 202.702 A/BFR
bonneville 2 club member 225.003 XXF/BGRMR

Offline Stan Back

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5115
  • Location: San Berdoo
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2018, 08:31:52 PM »
I'm thinking that clipping on to the "narrowest" part (wrist?) of a floppy suit ain't gonna cut it.
Member of the San Berdoo Roadsters -- "California's Most-Exclusive Roadster Club".
Celebrating 67th anniversary of racing on the salt.

Offline deep in debt motorsports

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 43
  • Location: Manteca Ca
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2018, 09:41:38 PM »
Yep,ran this last year,it clearly states adjusters!!!These are the style they are wanting and doesn’t say anything about sewn in being illegal,says,if it is NON-sewn in then must fit tight at smallest part of arm so that means if sewn in must be all good!! I feel rule change is for adjuster only????
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 10:04:07 PM by deep in debt motorsports »
#327 C/GR

Offline CTRon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
  • Age: 42
  • Location: connecticut
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #19 on: February 13, 2018, 09:30:58 AM »
I'm thinking that clipping on to the "narrowest" part (wrist?) of a floppy suit ain't gonna cut it.

The rings are sown into the jacket.
maxton 2 club member 205.188mph  A/BFR
loring 2 club member 219.807mph  A/BFR
Wilmington 2 club member 202.702 A/BFR
bonneville 2 club member 225.003 XXF/BGRMR

Buamotorsport

  • Guest
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2018, 02:14:39 PM »
Having spent time with Allan from Simpson at Pomona this past weekend there is without doubt confusion as to what is acceptable and what isn’t. I know that Simpson are trying to clarify the rule and what is or what isn’t acceptable.

Offline Frankie7799

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
  • Age: 47
  • Location: Surprise, AZ
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2018, 03:33:04 PM »
I just bought brand new Simpson arm restraints late last year as my previous ones were out of date. Guess Ill have to look at them when I get home and figure out if they are legal or not

Offline Tman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3637
  • Location: Black Hills, South Dakota
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #22 on: February 13, 2018, 04:04:08 PM »
I just bought brand new Simpson arm restraints late last year as my previous ones were out of date. Guess Ill have to look at them when I get home and figure out if they are legal or not

We are looking into it as well

Offline QikNip

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
  • Age: 75
  • Location: Crittenden, Kentucky
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #23 on: February 15, 2018, 01:50:06 PM »
I got tired of trying to figure it out, so I ordered a set yesterday from Deist. Not worth $40 to waste any more time! :dhorse: :-D
Rick
138.0 G/CPRO 4/18 Arkansas Mile Challenge Record
145.632 G/CPRO 8/17 Bonneville Record
149.825 G/CPRO 8/18 Bonneville Record

Offline thundersalt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 923
  • Age: 59
  • Location: orangevale, ca
    • www.americanrvservicecenter.com
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #24 on: February 15, 2018, 03:34:56 PM »
Just Recieved
916 AA/GRMR 
2017 AA/FRMR Bonneville Record holder
2018 AA/GRMR El Mirage Record holder
El Mirage 200 MPH Club
Drivers/Owners: Brian & Celia Dean

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2373
  • Age: 76
  • Location: Fulton, CA
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2018, 02:24:43 PM »
Pegasus Racing actually has the specified adjustment plate available for 1.75 to 2 inch straps. Duke and I are going to look at his Simpson arm restraints and see if they could be converted to this type of adjuster, would that void any type of warrentee or the SCTA new rule? We also considered having some water jet cut from some stainless plate to the exact strap width. Going with the DJ stuff is probably the best way.

I know that the SCTA does not make these type of changes without a good reason, have they seen failures of arm restraints with the welded "D" ring configuration?

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.

Offline Dynoroom

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2099
  • Age: 62
  • Location: Chino Hills, Ca.
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #26 on: February 16, 2018, 03:00:14 PM »
I know that the SCTA does not make these type of changes without a good reason, have they seen failures of arm restraints with the welded "D" ring configuration?

Rex

Yes, more than 1
Michael LeFevers
Kugel and LeFevers Pontiac Firebird

Without Data You're Just Another Guy With An Opinion!

Racing is just a series of "Problem Solving" events that allow you to spend money & make noise...

Offline Ron Gibson

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 769
  • Age: 79
  • Location: Omaha NE
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2018, 03:29:24 PM »
I think we need way more clarification of what is actually required for hardware and where. My Pyrotect restraints have a large welded D- ring on the end of the strap that the seat belt latch goes through,  a pair of small D rings to tighten the arm bands, and a one piece "ADJUSTER" on the restraint strap between the arm and the belt. I have no idea if this is legal for SCTA.

Ron
Life is an abrasive. Whether you get ground away or polished to a shine depends on what you are made of.

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7351
  • Age: 68
  • Location: Near Furley and Kechi KS
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2018, 09:11:08 PM »
I know that the SCTA does not make these type of changes without a good reason, have they seen failures of arm restraints with the welded "D" ring configuration?

Rex

Yes, more than 1

Lee Kennedy kept ours after the incident... although they did not fail, he sent them to DJ for inspection... He also mentioned they had "several d ring failures" in arm restraints and was working on a rule change.... Left my arm restraints with DJ to be put in compliance with the new rules...  Must be about time to call them again and see if they are ready
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, MSA Bockscar Lakester with a little N20 
MSA Bockscar Lakester #1000 my fastest mile 245 and change, 84 ci turbobusa motor... but Corey's 233 MPH H/BFL record is still 3MPH faster than mine.

Offline revolutionary

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Windermere, FL
Re: Simpson Arm restaint ... Does it meet the new rule?
« Reply #29 on: February 27, 2018, 08:32:48 AM »
Guess my new -20 suit with sewn in D-rings is not legal now. Rad
Breaking Wind #9614
  ECTA Record AA/BGALT 214.8
  SCTA Bonneville PB AA/BGALT 237.4
Breaking Wind "Spirit of Effluvium" #451
  SCTA Bonneville Record SC/BF100 48.931