The most cost effective way to move it is through hyrdo-dynamic action. Tom put up a good bit of detail about this at the PRI show and his estimate was either 2 or 4 inches (I forget which one) could be done in a year.
In order for it to be effective a few details needed to be dealt with.
1. We need to prevent the brine from making it into the collection ditches and having it run back to the other side of the road.
2. Mechanically moving salt in solution means that the saturation level cannot exceed a 26% solution. Concentrations higher than this will precipitate out from the mechanical action of pumping.
3. Brine that is less than 28% solution will pickup the additional 2% when it comes into contact with more salt. This means that if it were pumped back onto the surface directly it would carry 2% of the salt away from the surface. In order to prevent this, there needs to be an area where brine can be pumped into an additional supply of salt and THEN allowed to flow back onto the racing surface.
Hauling salt by the truckload would be logistically troublesome and cost prohibitive. We would also need flooding to level the surface out. Using the pumping method is cheaper (not free) and automatically levels the surface.
I believe it also will be beneficial in the slow curing process making the surface more integrated and dense and less likely to delaminate or have other contaminates within the surface.
I grew a series of potassium ferricyanide crystals in 8th grade science class for extra credit, I was the only one that did it. It seems the process is exactly the same except the beaker is the size of the BSF, otherwise, the process is exactly the same. Make a solution and remove the water slow enough to allow the crystal to grow.
potassium ferricyanide [Pic]