Author Topic: AERO  (Read 11163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline debgeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
AERO
« on: March 11, 2014, 03:51:10 PM »
Powered by bicycle  88 MPH
George---Sidecar in progress

Offline WOODY@DDLLC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • ECTA made it to AR-Kansas!
    • Design Dreams, LLC
Re: AERO
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2014, 06:38:44 PM »
http://www.recumbents.com/wisil/whpsc2013/results.htm
Date     9/14/2013
Rider     Sebastiaan Bowier
Vehicle Name Velox 3
New design in the works: http://www.hptdelft.nl/en/
Speed MPH 83.13
Speed KPH 133.78
 :cheers:
All models are wrong, but some are useful! G.E. Box (1967) www.designdreams.biz

Offline debgeo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: AERO
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2014, 02:05:00 PM »
THANKS for correction Woody.
George---Sidecar in progress

Offline SteveM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
Re: AERO
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2014, 06:13:18 PM »
Very impressive speed. I wonder if there is power data available for that run?  I'm guessing 1,000+ watts average.
1/2 of the Rampage Brothers

Offline Jack Gifford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1569
Re: AERO
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2014, 01:09:37 AM »
... I'm guessing 1,000+ watts average...
Maybe. I don't know if a human can apply about 1.5 HP or not.
M/T Pontiac hemi guru
F/BFL 1-mile Loring record 2020

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8964
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: AERO
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2014, 09:32:28 AM »
... I'm guessing 1,000+ watts average...
Maybe. I don't know if a human can apply about 1.5 HP or not.

Maybe for 8 furlongs...  :-D
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline fordboy628

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2342
  • GONE FISHIN' . . .
Re: AERO
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2014, 11:40:34 AM »
... I'm guessing 1,000+ watts average...
Maybe. I don't know if a human can apply about 1.5 HP or not.

Maybe for 8 furlongs...  :-D

I vaguely remember reading something about top Tour De France riders being able to produce 800 watts for short periods of time.    As in climbing mountains.    Power for average riders was 700/750 watts.

745.7 watts/hp

Average U.S. male Olympic athlete (non-cyclist) tested @ .5 hp  approx. 373 watts
Science, NOT Magic . . . .

I used to be a people person.  But people changed that relationship.

"There is nothing permanent except change."    Heraclitus

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."     Albert Einstein

Offline metermatch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 90
Re: AERO
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2014, 01:08:42 PM »
They couldn't go any faster than 88 mph because whenever they did, they went back in time...

Jeff

Offline salt27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1736
Re: AERO
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2014, 01:51:16 PM »
I vaguely remember reading something about top Tour De France riders being able to produce 800 watts for short periods of time.    As in climbing mountains.    Power for average riders was 700/750 watts.

745.7 watts/hp

Average U.S. male Olympic athlete (non-cyclist) tested @ .5 hp  approx. 373 watts

Is that with or without performance enhancing drugs.   :roll:

Offline 1212FBGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2532
    • http://www.motobody.com
Re: AERO
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2014, 09:34:55 PM »
got any shapes like that on your hard drive Woody?
kent

Offline WOODY@DDLLC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • ECTA made it to AR-Kansas!
    • Design Dreams, LLC
Re: AERO
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2014, 06:08:07 PM »
Kent, if I tell you I have to kill you!  :-D  However, I do have a concept for a 100+ mph human powered vehicle but can't get anyone interested in building it. Would be a great university project!  :cheers:

This shape was optimized analytically for the velocity/pressure distributions at the chosen speed range of 80~85 mph. [Laminar flow thingy!] Add 100, 200 or 300 mph and it all changes. The previous record holder was an "organic" design by a sculptor. http://www.varnahandcycles.com/hpv.htm The air getting into the wheel wells is a killer for these machines.  :-(

Now where did I put that weed-whacker engine and the model airplane fuel?  :?

There was a CFD study done that "proved" that if the second place guy would have cut his ponytail he would have beat the "enhanced" Lance! About 9 grams of drag is considered the theoretical difference between first and second place - all other enhancements being equal!  :-o
All models are wrong, but some are useful! G.E. Box (1967) www.designdreams.biz

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: AERO
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2014, 06:24:04 PM »
9 grams is approx. 4 times the weight difference in a NASCAR connecting rod that means legal/illegal for a competition imbalance.

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth

Blue

  • Guest
Re: AERO
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2014, 12:04:35 AM »
Took a while to find this, it was farther back than I thought

http://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php/topic,4084.0.html

Max HP for a trained rider in recumbant position is just over 2HP.  Much better than a conventional bicycle position.

Offline tauruck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: AERO
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2014, 02:49:16 AM »
Kent, if I tell you I have to kill you!  :-D  However, I do have a concept for a 100+ mph human powered vehicle but can't get anyone interested in building it. Would be a great university project!  :cheers:

This shape was optimized analytically for the velocity/pressure distributions at the chosen speed range of 80~85 mph. [Laminar flow thingy!] Add 100, 200 or 300 mph and it all changes. The previous record holder was an "organic" design by a sculptor. http://www.varnahandcycles.com/hpv.htm The air getting into the wheel wells is a killer for these machines.  :-(

Now where did I put that weed-whacker engine and the model airplane fuel?  :?

There was a CFD study done that "proved" that if the second place guy would have cut his ponytail he would have beat the "enhanced" Lance! About 9 grams of drag is considered the theoretical difference between first and second place - all other enhancements being equal!  :-o

I'll build it. :wink:

Offline fordboy628

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2342
  • GONE FISHIN' . . .
Re: AERO
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2014, 07:23:55 AM »
Kent, if I tell you I have to kill you!  :-D  However, I do have a concept for a 100+ mph human powered vehicle but can't get anyone interested in building it. Would be a great university project!  :cheers:

This shape was optimized analytically for the velocity/pressure distributions at the chosen speed range of 80~85 mph. [Laminar flow thingy!] Add 100, 200 or 300 mph and it all changes. The previous record holder was an "organic" design by a sculptor. http://www.varnahandcycles.com/hpv.htm The air getting into the wheel wells is a killer for these machines.  :-(

Now where did I put that weed-whacker engine and the model airplane fuel?  :?

There was a CFD study done that "proved" that if the second place guy would have cut his ponytail he would have beat the "enhanced" Lance! About 9 grams of drag is considered the theoretical difference between first and second place - all other enhancements being equal!  :-o

I'll build it. :wink:

Where do I sign up for the team?

My PowerAde ration can go to the cylclists, I'll be swilling something "better".    :wink:

The model airplane fuel I'd use is the stuff with Nitro . . . .
Science, NOT Magic . . . .

I used to be a people person.  But people changed that relationship.

"There is nothing permanent except change."    Heraclitus

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."     Albert Einstein