Author Topic: Carburetor size  (Read 2861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Truckedup

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 120
Carburetor size
« on: May 05, 2013, 07:05:21 AM »
  This is a very generalized question for a naturally aspirated engine.......Are higher flowing carbs used a Bonneville(altitude) as compared to sea level for the same engine build?
« Last Edit: May 05, 2013, 07:52:36 AM by Truckedup »
Triumph 650 LTA MPG record holder  133.1 MPH...

Offline RidgeRunner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 843
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2013, 07:53:47 AM »
This is a very generalized answer......  A quote I overheard years ago, "Never sacrifice velocity for volume"......  I'll add "at any altitude" based on my learning since.

Ed

Offline Koncretekid

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1203
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2013, 10:44:14 AM »
the general answer is "yes" because the atmospheric pressure is less.  For a more specific answer, you will need to provide more details of your particular motor/carburation/application, and someone will chime in that has more experience with the application.  You may also get conflicting advice.  My carburetor is way toooooo big - - still runs pretty good.
Tom
We get too soon oldt, and too late schmart!
Life's uncertain - eat dessert first!

Offline wobblywalrus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5503
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2013, 02:11:05 PM »
This is an interesting problem.  In the calculating phase of the build I sized the Triumph carbs based on cubic feet per minute flow and figured I was pulling in less air at B'ville and I would use smaller carbs.  In the final decision, the carbs are sized for adequate performance at sea level.  This question is one of several I could not figure out by theory.

Offline Nortonist 592

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1510
    • http://www.artfv.com/design/fashion/
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2013, 05:23:31 PM »
Interesting indeed.  I have a 540cc pushrod single.  I started off with a 38mm flatslide Kehin.  Ran in the low 120s.  I was told this carb flowed "excellent".  Which it seemed to do.  I swapped it out for a 45mm round slide Mikuni that I had used on another 500 single.  The difference in speed at Bonneville was an 8 mph improvement.  I've always been a fan of the theory that a big hole lets more air/gas in.  Which goes against the velocity theory.  But I'll stick with the bigger carb.
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.

Offline RichFox

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2663
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2013, 05:47:23 PM »
I had a GMC with three  275cfm Hollys that I replaced with 500cfm Hollys. Way to big by anybody's measurement. Ran better. Had a 460 Ford with an 800cfm four bbl. Put on an 1100cfm dominator. Ran much better.

Offline Dean Los Angeles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2013, 10:48:20 AM »
At sea level pressure is 14.7 psia.
Bonneville at 4,200 feet is 12.6 psia.

A smaller carburetor could work.
But the entire intake tract would have to match.
If you ignore any kind of intake tuning, bigger and less restriction is better.
The airflow through the carburetor acts on the venturi to provide a low pressure area to pull the fuel and atomize it.
Too large of a carburetor adversely affects the venturi. Too small restricts the air flow.

To calculate the proper size for that altitude requires knowing the volumetric efficiency of the engine.
Well, it used to be Los Angeles . . . 50 miles north of Fresno now.
Just remember . . . It isn't life or death.
It's bigger than life or death! It's RACING.

Offline rouse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 563
  • Impound is the place to be
Re: Carburetor size
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2013, 11:54:21 AM »
Bigger is usually better but it will have a effect on the venturi Delta/P, so tuning to get your mixture right will probably have to be done.

Years ago while running a different type racing, I found that running a restricter plate motor, required me to up the jet size to correct the tuning.


Rouse
Johnnie Rouse
Bike 4680 P-PP2000 SCTA record 153.325    A-PF3000 182.920
                              Texas Mile 152.518 PP class  186 A-PF Class
If you love your freedom thank a vet.