Author Topic: ez-hook nose  (Read 6149 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fastlammy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 65
ez-hook nose
« on: January 07, 2013, 07:12:23 PM »
Can any one tell me the purpose of cup in the nose in the front of the ex-hook stream liner

Offline Glen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7024
  • SCTA/BNI timer 1983 to 2004, Retired,. Crew on Tur
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2013, 07:14:58 PM »
That is the air intake for the rider and air to the engine.
Glen
Crew on Turbinator II

South West, Utah

Offline panic

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 845
    • My tech papers
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2013, 11:35:05 AM »
Any info on how the size was selected?
Obviously, enough area for 355 is too small for 200, etc.

Offline Glen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7024
  • SCTA/BNI timer 1983 to 2004, Retired,. Crew on Tur
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2013, 11:45:01 AM »
google the easyhook web site
Glen
Crew on Turbinator II

South West, Utah

stwheeler

  • Guest
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2013, 02:09:24 PM »

Offline fredvance

  • FVANCE
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2297
    • Vance and Forstall Racing
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2013, 02:25:07 PM »
Is Sam going to be at Cooks Shootout this year?
WORLDS FASTEST PRODUCTION MOTORCYCLE 213.470
Vance&Forstall Racing
WOS 2011 235+MPH
Engine by Knecum, Tuned by Johnny Cheese.
Sponsers Catalyst Composites, Johnny Cheese Perf, Knecum Racing Engines, Murray Headers, Carpenter Racing

stwheeler

  • Guest
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2013, 03:10:05 PM »
He is shooting for it.

Offline John Burk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 695
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2013, 10:44:25 PM »
An inlet at the static pressure area doesn't need to be sized like a scoop but 100% pressure is in a fairly small area so oversize means less pressure .

Offline Jon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 852
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2013, 02:32:19 AM »
Lots of interesting NACA research in "nose nozzles", worth a google, a lot better pressure recovery than NACA ducts, the hard bit is getting the air from there to where you want to use it efficiently.

Sizing is not as critical as you would think if the rim is of decent design.

Cheers
jon
Underhouse Engineering
Luck = Opportunity + Preparation^3

Offline Dean Los Angeles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2370
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2013, 11:58:38 AM »
The nose is an excellent place to pull air. It's too far from anyplace to be useful unless it's on a motorcycle fairing.  Conductance losses in the long ducting to the engine on a streamliner would make the NACA duct or a ram air duct closer to the engine a better choice.
Well, it used to be Los Angeles . . . 50 miles north of Fresno now.
Just remember . . . It isn't life or death.
It's bigger than life or death! It's RACING.

Offline sockjohn

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2013, 10:07:33 PM »
The nose is an excellent place to pull air. It's too far from anyplace to be useful unless it's on a motorcycle fairing.  Conductance losses in the long ducting to the engine on a streamliner would make the NACA duct or a ram air duct closer to the engine a better choice.

Would make sense on a front wheel drive car too.

I know there was a front wheel drive lakester running around 2007 or so, but for the life of me can't remember whose car it was.  I don't recall the details of the air inlet, but will look to see if I have a picture of it.


Offline PorkPie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2042
  • think fast.....always
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2013, 06:32:21 AM »
George Johnson - Saltosaurus
Pork Pie

Photoartist & Historian & 200 MPH Club Member (I/GL 202.8 mph in the orig. Bockscar #1000)

Offline wickedwagens

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2013, 02:08:51 PM »
The nose is an excellent place to pull air. It's too far from anyplace to be useful unless it's on a motorcycle fairing.  Conductance losses in the long ducting to the engine on a streamliner would make the NACA duct or a ram air duct closer to the engine a better choice.

Would make sense on a front wheel drive car too.

I know there was a front wheel drive lakester running around 2007 or so, but for the life of me can't remember whose car it was.  I don't recall the details of the air inlet, but will look to see if I have a picture of it.


Not just front wheel drive but anything front engine.
1968 Volkswagen Karmann Ghia
G/CFALT  106.643 MPH  8/2016    G/CGALT  113.131 MPH  9/2016
G/CBGALT  169.462  MPH  8/2021    G/CBFALT  146.715  MPH  8/2017
G/CBGC  158.242  MPH  9/2017   H/CBGC  94.334 MPH  8/2018
H/CPRO  93.383 MPH  8/2018   H/CBFALT  101.282 MPH 9/2018
H/CBGALT  120.591 MPH 9/2018
Top Speed 170.726 MPH
36hp VW 100 mph club 9/2019 102.319 MPH

Offline gidge348

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2013, 12:35:53 AM »
Just thinking of this a different way but I’m probably on a totally incorrect line (please let me know).

What if the duct taken from the stagnation point has nothing to do with "supercharging” the engine, but has to do with reducing effective total frontal area?

Say the duct represents 20% of the total frontal area.

The air at the duct is getting sucked in at say 300mph and the vehicle is traveling at say 300 mph so efectively duct is sucking a vacume equivelent to 20% of the frontal area.

I guess this is kind of like the early jet fighters of the 1950’s (F86 Sabre/Mig 15 etc.).

I believe that the main reason for the change in inlet ducts on modern jets is that as speeds began to rise closer to mach 1 air flow though the engines became a problem.

Another analogy would be pushing a piece of pipe through water, say both ends are open so it pushes through with little resistance. Now block the ends and resistance from the created stagnation point is conciderable.

Any thoughts?

Ian...       

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Re: ez-hook nose
« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2013, 01:39:53 PM »
First the air going into the inlet is not sucked in at 300 mph, it is pushed in by the forward speed of the bike, in this case, and you now have air at 300 mph that is going through an inlet tract that may not be smooth so it is probably turbulent and very likely un-attached so therefore high drag. Nothing is free, in your pipe example if you push the pipe through the water slowly then the drag is only related to the "frontal area" of the pipe as the flow through the pipe is laminar, but as you go faster such that the Reynolds number exceeds approx 5000 (I think, it might be higher) the flow becomes turbulent and the drag increases considerably with speed.

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.