Author Topic: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners  (Read 78652 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Moxnix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 826
  • Zufrieden mit Mir.
    • Speed Bumps on the Road to Perdition
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #165 on: November 29, 2012, 02:44:36 PM »
My January 2013 Sport Rider magazine arrived in the post today.  Very good article on Sam Wheeler and the E-Z Hook liner, and enough pictures to help see what's going on under the skin.
Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.
http://speedbumpsontheroadtoperdition.wordpress.com/

Offline edweldon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #166 on: November 29, 2012, 09:52:43 PM »
Monix - I'm not a 2 wheel guy so could you answer a question for me? ..... Is Sport Rider a magazine I can find on a well stocked newstand?  I'd like to get a copy of that issue/article to study.
Ed Weldon
Captain Eddie's Day Old Fish Market -- home of the Bonneville Salt Fish
Featuring the modern miracle of mechanical refrigeration.

Offline bvillercr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2291
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #167 on: November 30, 2012, 01:29:17 AM »
Just google e-z hook streamliner, plenty of info out there. :cheers:

Offline Moxnix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 826
  • Zufrieden mit Mir.
    • Speed Bumps on the Road to Perdition
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #168 on: November 30, 2012, 01:40:08 PM »
Ed, I think so. 
Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.
http://speedbumpsontheroadtoperdition.wordpress.com/

Offline edweldon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #169 on: December 01, 2012, 02:21:04 AM »
Bvilleercr and Moxnix -- Thanks guys. The two videos on the e-z hook website are real interesting.  The CNC machined rear frame structure is really interesting.  Fills me full of ideas I can't afford. If I had my oldest son's skills with Solidworks and Cosmos FEA and the experience to produce machine code with the likes of Mach3 and easy access to a 3 axis CNC mill and a year or so to learn it all before I get too old to drive a lakester and .......  or if I were 20 years younger.......
Ed
Captain Eddie's Day Old Fish Market -- home of the Bonneville Salt Fish
Featuring the modern miracle of mechanical refrigeration.

Offline Moxnix

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 826
  • Zufrieden mit Mir.
    • Speed Bumps on the Road to Perdition
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #170 on: December 01, 2012, 06:58:40 PM »
Ed, the rear subframe and belt drive pulley system caught my eye, too.  This is a liner that experienced front tire failure at +/- 300 mph some years back, slowing from a 350 run; the chute kept it from flipping/rolling.  No injury, no major damage.  Real impressive.  Looks like the tubing choice was good.
Seen it all, done it all, can't remember most of it.
http://speedbumpsontheroadtoperdition.wordpress.com/

Offline nebulous

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
Re: Tubing requirement change for 2-wheel streamliners
« Reply #171 on: August 22, 2013, 10:13:19 AM »
Design inovation will soon be gone! We will then only need enough money to buy horsepower!
Jack Costella   
"Records are set by effort, not by the stroke of a pen!"