Well, okay, if there was a problem, it had to swing on the decision of a person or group of persons.
So who dropped the ball?
Has a challenge to the record been filed? I understand that there is a procedure for that, and one of the reasons it's there is to maintain the integrity of the rules.
Sparky, Stainless, I agree with the principals you spell out, but before I'm willing to buy into the argument of favoritism, I'd like to see a more thorough airing of the facts, and a check of the paper trail.
Somebody had to sign off.
I'm hearing the accusers - I'm not hearing from the accused - in this case, the SCTA officials involved. A challenge to the record would shed light on the issue.