Author Topic: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread  (Read 821424 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SteveM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #660 on: April 18, 2013, 11:55:45 AM »
I have wondered about the foam issue myself.  I think I'll pull it out.

This thing is 3 gallons, which should be plenty to prevent air ingestion / sloshing / aereation problems with a 1.5 Liter diesel.

Steve.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2013, 03:36:09 PM by SteveM »
1/2 of the Rampage Brothers

Offline tauruck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #661 on: April 18, 2013, 06:29:39 PM »
Thanks Steve. Good luck with all the nice new stuff. You deserve it man.

Offline SteveM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #662 on: April 19, 2013, 11:44:26 AM »
In my ongoing quest to max out all of my credit cards, I purchased a set of Gabriel HiJacker air shocks for the rear suspension.

These are cute little guys - as far as I can tell, they are the shortest available air shocks from the Gabriel or Monroe catalogs.





Sadly, they no longer include the Gabriel HiJacker "bunny" sticker with their product.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2013, 11:46:44 AM by SteveM »
1/2 of the Rampage Brothers

Offline SteveM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #663 on: April 20, 2013, 05:32:20 PM »
More quick pics.



I picked up the wheels and tires today, fresh from Western Auto, complete with metal valve stems.





I had to mount the wheels, pop on the Moon disks, and put her back on the ground.  Right now, the front crossmember and oil pan are about 3" from the ground.  The lowest point on the control arms is about 2-1/2" from the ground.  I'm thinking about trying to get another 1" of drop by re-working the coilover setup.

Steve
1/2 of the Rampage Brothers

Offline Rex Schimmer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
  • Only time and money prevent completion!
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #664 on: April 20, 2013, 06:09:31 PM »
Looks fast just sitting there!!!

Rex
Rex

Not much matters and the rest doesn't matter at all.

Offline tauruck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #665 on: April 21, 2013, 12:07:42 AM »
 :cheers: That must be a great feeling. It looks good Steve.

Offline Frankie7799

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #666 on: April 21, 2013, 12:15:22 AM »
Looks fast just sitting there!!! Rex

I agree Rex!

gkabbt

  • Guest
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #667 on: April 21, 2013, 07:32:49 AM »



Steve, looking REAL GOOD.....It does look fast too!  :cheers:

Just curious.....Are the control arms pointing up, parallel to the ground or pointing down?

Gregg
« Last Edit: April 21, 2013, 11:00:21 AM by gkabbt »

Offline SteveM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #668 on: April 21, 2013, 04:07:42 PM »
They are pointing up, which is not considered good for "handling", but I think this will be OK, as the control arms should remain pointed up through the entire range of motion.

Steve.
1/2 of the Rampage Brothers

Offline Crackerman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #669 on: April 21, 2013, 09:32:45 PM »
Steve, i am positive you will be fine, especially at the speeds you have planned.
I had a 550 hp 89 plymouth colt that was lowered, and control arms pointed up pretty sharply. Even north of 145 on public highways ( not smooth) it had no ill handling issues. It was mighty stable (except for torque steer)

Offline SteveM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1483
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #670 on: April 22, 2013, 09:38:37 AM »
Thanks, Crackerman.  Did you have one of those turbo twin-stick Colts?  I can't remember which years they were available, but they were pretty cool little cars.

Yeah, I'm not very worried about the front suspension geometry.  It seems to me that the main issues would be associated with a transition from pointed down to pointed up, as the camber curves change.  Mine will be pointed up the entire time.

The question running around in my head is "How Low" should/could I go.  Right now, the lowest point is in the area of the pivot for the LCA, which is about 2-1/2" from the ground.  I'm thinking about going another inch lower, which would put this pivot location at 1-1/2" from the surface. 

For getting off and on the trailer, I'll have to make a couple of easily removable split sleeves, which will space the coilovers "up" on the strut body.  Then, when it's on level ground, I'll jack it up, remove the sleeves, and let it down to the full droop geometry.

Steve.
1/2 of the Rampage Brothers

Offline Kevin G

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #671 on: April 22, 2013, 10:01:41 AM »
Of all the things discussed on landracing forums Dodge Colts were about the last thing I ever expected to turn up. I had an 88 colt 4 speed. I have to say it was the most fun car I have owned, but by no means fast. I've always heard about the twin stick colts and wanted one.

Kevin G
68 in a 55. Michigan State Police. 98
65 in a 55. Wayne County Sheriff. 02
Loud exhaust. Memphis City Police 03

Offline tauruck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5127
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #672 on: April 22, 2013, 10:14:38 AM »
Steve maybe the geometry thing is more critical on a road course car.

Offline Tman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3672
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #673 on: April 22, 2013, 12:22:22 PM »
1 1/2 to 2" and you will be grading crunchies if you get off the turn outs.

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8964
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: '84 Dodge Rampage Build Thread
« Reply #674 on: April 22, 2013, 03:10:43 PM »
1 1/2 to 2" and you will be grading crunchies if you get off the turn outs.

But you will be limiting the air going under the truck on the course.... We usually try to put the front of the lakester high enough that you can slip the toe of your shoe to the laces under it.  Rarely hit a turnout correctly, the salt is hard on the paint, but washes off. 
Have the back a bit higher than the front, give the air that gets under it somewhere to go. 
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O