Author Topic: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES  (Read 33821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Glen

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7024
  • SCTA/BNI timer 1983 to 2004, Retired,. Crew on Tur
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #30 on: November 24, 2011, 02:51:10 PM »
Just trying to follow this has got me in the scotch early.
Have fun Dan.
 :cheers:
Glen
Crew on Turbinator II

South West, Utah

Offline Bob Drury

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2599
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #31 on: November 24, 2011, 03:53:38 PM »
  So thats where that wonderful voice came from!  Happy Turkey Day to you, Glen.
  Don't forget the nap before the pie............... :-D
Bob Drury

Offline Stainless1

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8968
  • Robert W. P. "Stainless" Steele
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #32 on: November 24, 2011, 07:12:40 PM »
Sounds like a hangover to me. LOL I won't buy anything cheaper at Trader Joe's than their own brand wine which is $4 a bottle. Maybe that is why I am not racing, I have a bigger budget for wine than the race cars, but don't have hangovers. LOL.

Maybe I can get Trader Joe's to sponsor me and then I can give out free samples after the races. Ha Ha Ha.

Tom G.

After?   Tom, nothing quenches your thirst more than cheap wine... hey Stan, pass me a box of that pink stuff  :roll:
 :cheers:
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

Offline JimL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 802
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #33 on: November 24, 2011, 11:25:29 PM »
Thanks for early look at the rules, as this has stopped me before I got too far.  This one has me befuddled:  Modified Production class

"Perimeter type frame engine cradle tubes must remain unmodified."  But it says you can change the steering head angle (not in my plans), which would be cutting and welding on the spars.  Also, earlier in the paragraph it says it's ok to remove or modify brackets.  Soooo, can you take the various wire harness and bodywork brackets off the perimeter tubes (sharp little guys that stick out the sides)?  I've also had to move the rear upper shock mount, to do the engine swap, but that appears to still be ok.  

Can you add brackets or mounts onto the original unmodified spars?  I'd rather weld my new engine mounts on direct, as opposed to running long tubes from another area, but I'll work around as necessary.  It doesn't appear the we are trying to prevent engine swaps (same brand), but if new mounts can't be added...hmmm. :?

Thoughts?  Talk to Van, Tom or Matt?  I'll try an email.
Regards, JimL

 
« Last Edit: November 24, 2011, 11:40:51 PM by JimL »

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #34 on: November 24, 2011, 11:47:17 PM »
"Talk to Van, Tom or Matt?  I'll try an email" - Yes

Jim - best idea is to go to the source.

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth

Offline JimL

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 802
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #35 on: November 24, 2011, 11:56:49 PM »
Thanks Dan, I did send an email to Van.  I'll hold off on any more work on that bike, and work on the current A- bike while I'm waiting.

This "retirement" stuff is strange; busier than I ever was while "working".  More to do than time allows; reminds me of my 2-stroke days, when they'd run faster and faster until they seized (errrr, sorry folks, bad comparison for some of us "seniors")!

JimL

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #36 on: November 30, 2011, 12:38:40 PM »
After some pushing the rule changes are now on the SCTA-BNI website, www.scta-bni.org. Click Whats New in left hand margin.

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth

Offline jl222

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2957
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #37 on: November 30, 2011, 03:28:28 PM »
After some pushing the rule changes are now on the SCTA-BNI website, www.scta-bni.org. Click Whats New in left hand margin.

DW

  Dan...I think the wording is wrong on competition coupe wings.

  5.D.1  '' The lowest portion of wing shall be AT LEAST 6in. above the higest point of the body''.

           Shouldn't that read NO MORE than 6 in. above the highest point of body?

          As it now states any wing would have to be AT LEAST 6 in above the roof line.

          If our Camaro was a comp coup I would like to have the wing mounted 6-12'' above the deck lid or below the roof
       line. Not 20'' min.above the deck.

     
  
                 JL222

                          

« Last Edit: November 30, 2011, 03:34:16 PM by jl222 »

Offline WOODY@DDLLC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1806
  • ECTA made it to AR-Kansas!
    • Design Dreams, LLC
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #38 on: November 30, 2011, 03:32:39 PM »
This "retirement" stuff is strange; busier than I ever was while "working".  More to do than time allows; reminds me of my 2-stroke days, when they'd run faster and faster until they seized (errrr, sorry folks, bad comparison for some of us "seniors")!

JimL

Jim there are just not enough days in the hours!  :-(
Run till you seize - wait to cool off - then run again! Ring-ding-ding!  :cheers:
All models are wrong, but some are useful! G.E. Box (1967) www.designdreams.biz

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #39 on: November 30, 2011, 08:47:33 PM »
John,

The rule is written as submitted by George Fields and Tom Burkland. As I wrote before, contact them if you think the design is wrong. Doesn't make sense to me either but, I have no control.

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth

Offline jl222

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2957
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #40 on: December 01, 2011, 12:52:26 PM »
John,

The rule is written as submitted by George Fields and Tom Burkland. As I wrote before, contact them if you think the design is wrong. Doesn't make sense to me either but, I have no control.

DW

    Must make sense to anyone that voted for it :roll:

   Limits on wing height are usually on how high their mounted not how low.

   No limit on heigth ....WOW unbelievable :-o

               JL222   



            

  
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 12:57:49 PM by jl222 »

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #41 on: December 01, 2011, 03:24:08 PM »
"Wing width including side plates shall not be wider than the outside width of the body. The maximum allowable height of the wing including side plates shall not exceed 65 in. from the ground as measured to the highest part of the wing. The rear of the wing including side plates may not be set back more than 18 in. behind the rear of the body. The lowest portion of the wing shall be at least 6 in. above the highest point of the body.  The total wing area (measured by the fore-to-aft dimension times the side-to-side dimension on the top surface) shall not exceed 1152 square in. Multiple element wings are NOT allowed.

The portion in red looks like a maximum height to me. How should that sentence be written?

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth

Offline jl222

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2957
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #42 on: December 01, 2011, 03:50:58 PM »
"Wing width including side plates shall not be wider than the outside width of the body. The maximum allowable height of the wing including side plates shall not exceed 65 in. from the ground as measured to the highest part of the wing. The rear of the wing including side plates may not be set back more than 18 in. behind the rear of the body. The lowest portion of the wing shall be at least 6 in. above the highest point of the body.  The total wing area (measured by the fore-to-aft dimension times the side-to-side dimension on the top surface) shall not exceed 1152 square in. Multiple element wings are NOT allowed.

The portion in red looks like a maximum height to me. How should that sentence be written?

DW

  Yea right there in plain sight :-P

  But I still don't know the reasoning of the minimum height rule,which should be rewritten to be a minimum of 6 in. from
deck lid, or the minimum height taken out.

   JL222

  
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 04:02:12 PM by jl222 »

Offline Peter Jack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3776
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #43 on: December 01, 2011, 05:06:47 PM »
Just a guess John, but it might be to stop the construction of tunnels.

Pete

Offline dw230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3168
Re: 2012 SCTA Rules CHANGES
« Reply #44 on: December 01, 2011, 06:15:03 PM »
I have no idea as to why the wing design is written that way. You would have to ask the authors.

DW
White Goose Bar - Where LSR is a lifestyle
Alcohol - because no good story starts with a salad.

Don't be Karen, be Beth