Landracing Forum

Bonneville Salt Flats Discussion => 2017 and before: SW & WF => SpeedWeek 2013 => Topic started by: Dean Los Angeles on August 18, 2013, 01:47:02 PM

Title: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dean Los Angeles on August 18, 2013, 01:47:02 PM
There are a ton of legendary records set at Bonneville.
Poteet and Main at 437 this year. Unbelievable.
A few years ago the Buddfab motorcycle streamliner running 131 on 3 freakin cubic inches.

But this isn’t about this.

Quote
The were something like 146 new records set - but strangely enough, 96 or so were by bikes and the rest by cars/trucks.  The usual is just the opposite of that -- lots more car records than bikes. n I don't know why there's a difference and none was offered.

Slim said that two days before the end of the meet. I count 109 bike records.

It’s because 29 of the records were bought. As soon as they paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.

But that’s not all.
I understand this. It’s called cherry picking. You find an open record or a slow record and run for it. But it’s hardly competitive. I give everybody credit for coming out and setting a record. It’s not the easiest thing to do, even on an open record.

Except for the guys resetting the 650 P-P record , Every record set had a faster record in a slower category.

Analysis:
fuel – faster than gas
blown – faster than unblown
partial streamlined – faster than unstreamlined
streamliner – faster than partial streamlined
bigger cc – faster than smaller cc
sidecar – well . . . sidecar. Numbers way out of proportion to the real world.
pushrod/vintage – because pushrod/vintage

37 pushrod records
39 vintage records
17 sidecar records
39 blown records
29 open records
40 under 100 mph (50cc unstreamlined gas record 85 mph - 29 didn’t even make that.)
Most a combination of the above
Only 8 without one of the above.
3 were in the same class and re-setting the record. 4 others ditto.

Fastest 25 analyzed. The rest don’t break the pattern.

VehEntry NameEngineBody No handicapPushrodVintageSidecarBlownNo recordOld RecordNew RecordDriver NameComment
8269BJim Hoogerhyde / SFMC1000CCAPS-F  x221.583222.850Suzuki239 gas record
1648BSan Diego Motorcycles1000CCAPS-F  x221.583222.756239 gas record
8269BJim Hoogerhyde / SFMC1000CCAPS-F  x218.323221.583Suzuki239 gas record
3419BScott Guthrie Racing2000CCAPS-BF xx0.000220.595Suzuki236 unblown
3411BScott Guthrie Racing1650CCSC-G   x175.481218.420Suzuki226 partial streamlined
3418BScott Guthrie Racing2000CCAPS-BG x170.465215.813Suzuki252 unblown
8081BCostella/Cunha/Bassano650CC SCS-F  xx0.000197.036Tim CunhaWithout the sidecar would be running against a 1962 230 mph record.
3399BTeam Bennett LSR1650CCAPS-PG x172.591196.843H/D226 non pushrod
3414BScott Guthrie Racing2000CCA-BG   x134.428190.736Suzuki197 unblown record
1016BDestination / Huff1350CCAPS-PG x177.998184.464HD/Buell219 non pushrod
1016BDestination / Huff1350CCAPS-PG x184.464181.397Buell219 non pushrod
2931BPaul Friebus1000CCMPS-VBGxx167.944180.659H/D182 unblown unstreamlined
8080BCostella/Cunha/Bassano650CC SCS-G  xx0.000176.547Suzuki196 partial streamlined 210 streamliner. 
6661BStoney FritzUNLIM A-PBG  xxx0.000174.742Yamaha171 unblown 650 record
5154BTeam Subtle Crowbar1350CCMPS-PG x172.479173.163Moto Guzzi223 non pushrod
2469BJay Allen Racing2000CCA-PG   x169.966172.414S & S Cycle197 non pushrod
1021BShunji Yokokawa650CC P-P    x169.684170.821Honda1.137 mph over record * These guys were racing!
858BACAT / Butler / Erion / Hobbs650CC P-P    x169.684170.654Honda.970 mph over the record - see above *
858BACAT / Butler / Erion / Hobbs650CC P-P    x167.319169.684Honda2.365 mph bumped record see above *
2169BJay Allen Racing2000CCA-PF   x169.309169.330S & S201 non pushrod
931BPaul Friebus1000CCMPS-VBFxxx0.000168.652H/D195 unblown unstreamlined
2931BPaul Friebus1000CCMPS-VBGxx145.410167.944H/D182 unblown unstreamlined
858BACAT / Butler / Erion / Hobbs650CC P-P    x165.994167.319Honda1.325 over record - see above *
9876BSperanza Brant Robinson2000CCSC-PF  xx146.196162.424Total Performance214 non sidecar pushrod
1350BBonneville Bobber1350CCM-VBF  xxx0.000159.420H/D
810BZen Motorcycle1350CCM-PBG  xx155.897158.642H/D
1581BJim Leininger650CC APS-PF x128.231156.389Honda
3358BBonneville Bobber1350CCMPS-VBGxxx0.000152.622H/D
4451BBob Lewis1350CCM-VG   x149.496152.456H/D
9011BDouble Vision1350CCAPS-VF x135.438151.448Triumph
445BBob Lewis1350CCMPS-VG x110.801150.998H/D
3350BBonneville Bobber1350CCM-VBG  xxx0.000150.548H/D
632BLeTop-Baloo Racing Team500CC MPS-BG x143.298149.800Kawasaki
1358BBonneville Bobber1350CCMPS-VBFxxx0.000149.676H/D
4451BBob Lewis1350CCM-VG   x101.955149.496H/D
7134BPerformance Indian1350CCA-VG   x132.338148.012Indian
632BLeTop-Baloo Racing Team500CC MPS-BG x120.507143.298Kawasaki
901BDouble Vision1350CCAPS-VG x128.241140.210Triumph
3931BPaul Friebus1000CCMPS-VG x126.059139.048H/D
797BDan Wagner650CC MPS-PF x133.998135.891Honda
1580BMarc Leininger650CC A-PF   x167.542134.849Honda
1110BScott Guthrie Racing750CC P-PPB  xxx0.000133.625Honda
1602BCorey Bertelsen250CC SC-G   x120.016133.324Honda
2602BCorey Bertelsen250CC SC-F   x125.101133.305Honda
3413BScott Guthrie Racing750CC M-PBF  xx129.937133.133Honda
3412BScott Guthrie Racing750CC M-PBG  xx129.134131.298Honda
1582BJim Leininger650CC A-PG   x126.976130.713Honda
1102BScott Guthrie Racing750CC A-PBG  xx111.791130.208Honda
1141BAnders Jonsson650CC APS-PF x128.231130.181GSO
1114BScott Guthrie Racing750CC A-PBF  xx111.791128.822Honda
7734BRed Cup Screamer250CC MPS-BG x99.445127.714Yamaha
1134BRed Cup Screamer250CC M-BG   x98.475126.607Yamaha
735BDave Arnold1000CCM-PBF  xx125.922126.231H/D
209BJXN Racing350CC MPS-BF x115.015123.115Joel Jackson
7919BBill Anderson650CC SC-PG  xx121.042121.553Weslake
837BJXN Racing350CC MPS-BG x102.643121.178Yamaha
867BJXN Racing350CC M-BG   x100.294120.097Yamaha
969BJXN Racing350CC M-BF   xx0.000119.103Yamaha
330BLouis Wilson350CC MPS-BF xx0.000115.015Yamaha
9317BPaul Friebus500CC A-VF   x110.729111.839H/D
4997BSaline Turner KTC500CC A-VF   x110.152110.729Triumph
194BGeorge Nachtsheim650CC APS-PBGxx98.873110.352Triumph
1189BBrooks Motor Works500CC SC-VG  xx94.333106.719BMW
865BEcole De La Performance350CC A-VF   x105.454106.622AMC
665BBullet650CC P-PP   x106.490106.601BMW
8608BEcole De La Performance350CC A-VG   x88.830105.673AMC
740BPit Bull175CC P-P    x99.700104.449Honda105 mph 125cc record
8658BEcole De La Performance350CC APS-VF x97.511101.812AMC
5778BKamphuis Frank Z350CC APS-PBGxxx0.00098.873Buell
5777BKamphuis Auntmaria350CC A-PBF  xxx0.00097.964Buell
370BOMRA Bike #11650CCA-PBF  xxx0.00097.916H/D
1803BGoldwing Lyon Kubo2000CCSC-BG  xx87.94797.264Honda
5779BKamphuis Lanapottr350CC A-PBG  xx15.85196.975Buell
5771BKamphuis TL Kelly350CC APS-PBFxxx0.00093.474Buell
7865BEcole De La Performance250CC A-VF   x86.71592.221AMC
1476BTri-Mac-Speedsters100CC APS-BF x48.91091.659Yamaha
1856BRichard Krczal750CC SC-PG  xx90.84391.286Triumph
8688BEcole De La Performance350CC APS-VG x81.90386.818AMC
876BCanter / Rosenthal Racing250CC MPS-PF x80.75885.816Aermacchi
476BTri-Mac Speedsters100CC APS-BG x81.86984.533Yamaha
576BDarold Cummings175CC APS-PG x71.31984.476Gilera
376BBonneville Bantam125CC APS-VG x79.22084.440BSA
579BDarold Cummings175CC APS-PF x76.41884.324Gilera
8761BCanter & Rosenthal Racing250CC M-PF   x79.19883.148H/D
3751BBonneville Bantam125CC MPS-VF x61.32782.494BSA
621BBrooks Motor Works250CC MPS-VF xx0.00082.486BMW
571BDarold Cummings175CC A-PG   x72.28580.453Gilera
536BSportsman Flyer250CC A-PF   x78.04880.438Honda
376BBonneville Bantam125CC APS-VG xx0.00079.220BSA
375BBonneville Bantam125CC MPS-VG x42.23979.059BSA
4158BBrooks Motor Works350CC SC-VG  xx48.87978.428BMW
1627BBrooks Motor Works350CC SC-VF  xx68.24178.318BMW
679BJohn Stoner/No Sense LSR175CC M-BF   xx0.00075.828Honda
375BBonneville Bantam125CC MPS-VG x42.23975.106BSA
574BDarold Cummings175CC SC-PF  xx68.35875.009Gilera
474BDarold Cummings175CC SC-PG  xx68.66174.175Gilera
6779BJohn Stoner/No Sense Land Speed Racing175CC MPS-BF xx0.00073.086Honda
540BScott Baxter350CC SC-VF  xxx0.00068.241BSA
823BPrairie Drifters125CC MPS-VF x57.53361.327H/D
823BPrairie Drifters125CC MPS-VF xx0.00057.533H/D
3523BSac Speed Special125CC M-VG   x43.44952.353H/D
7052BRetarded Sparks Special175CC M-VF   xx0.00050.049H/D
7053BRetarded Sparks Special175CC MPS-VG xx0.00049.727H/D
3286BBmac LSR125CC MPS-BG x999.99945.526Honda
1962BSaline Tyson KTC100CC APS-VF xx999.99942.179AMC
286BBMAC LSR125CC MPS-BF xx0.00040.357Honda
1960BSaline Tyson KTC100CC SC-VG  xxx0.00036.744AMC
7960BSaline Tyson KTC100CC SC-VF  xxx0.00030.469AMC
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 18, 2013, 01:58:24 PM
Congratulations, Dean!

I have a bit of understanding of MC classes, and what you did took a lot of time and energy.  It may be hard for non-motorcycle readers to comprehend, and I'm sure that there'll be challenges to some of it.  But not to worry, there're still be lots of holes left to plug next year.

Thanx,
Stan
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: thefrenchowl on August 18, 2013, 06:59:56 PM
Well, I was chasing the 650cc MPS VBG, 119mph and a bit...

Did a 121.775mph to qualify...

Went to impound to be told I was in the wrong class...

I am now in 650cc APS VBF, that's an open record...

Tried for another qualifier as fast as the MPS one but my rear cylinder quit...

There's always next year... ;-)

(http://www.harleykrxlrtt.com/images/team.jpg)

Patrick



Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dakin Engineering on August 18, 2013, 07:19:39 PM
Mr. Owl,
What did they gig you for?
BTDT, but  why?

Sam
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: ronnieroadster on August 18, 2013, 08:11:35 PM
 :?   I'm wondering if the daily runs listed by the SCTA from last week includes ALL the runs made. This year there certainly seems like a lot less car records. BUT when viewing the pictures of vehicles at the event I find no times listed for any runs for a number of them when studying the SCTA daily runs. Just wondering!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: sabat on August 18, 2013, 09:07:16 PM
VERY impressive data organization and analysis  :cheers:

I think anyone would generally agree with your interpretation. Perhaps in 20 years all the open records will be filled, and there will be multiple competitive entries in every class, like the cars...

The 200 club minimum for this record is 205, not too far off.

399B   Team Bennett LSR   1650CC   APS-PG   196.843   

Dean
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Gu11ett on August 18, 2013, 11:36:41 PM
I am confused, or do not get the point presented. At one time all records for cars and bikes were open. Someone had to fill in the blanks. Now the open record is gone and those that want to up the speed will have to work a little harder. As far as push rod VS non-push rod, someone realized the push rod engines could not compete with overhead cam engines and divided the classes. Lump them together and the majority of push rod bikes might as well retire.
 I could be wrong and please correct me if I am. When Cliff Gullett broke the S-F 500cc record in 2008, it had been held by J. Thomas since 1958. Instead of removing Thomas' name from the record, they reclassified it to S-PF so he is still in the book. This has been talked about happening on the S-F 1000cc record. A current 1000cc overhead cam Streamliner should be able to break the record easily. If it does, the current record will be reclassified to S-PF or S-PVF so the current record holder will stay in the book.
 As far as smaller engines running faster than bigger engines, it happens every meet with cars and bikes.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: LittleLiner on August 19, 2013, 02:07:33 AM
Dean

Interesting analysis.   You certainly put a lot of time, effort and thought in compiling the info.
On one hand you imply that it is a problem allowing these records while on the other hand you give credit to those that set these records.   
I understand this. It’s called cherry picking. You find an open record or a slow record and run for it. But it’s hardly competitive. I give everybody credit for coming out and setting a record. It’s not the easiest thing to do, even on an open record.
So , which is it?  Are these records that should be considered cheap, easily obtained and sub-parr.  Or are they records to be proud of because they were earned honestly under the current process for setting a record?

. . What is your solution to this situation?   Are you suggesting that we have minimums (like El Mirage or the 200mph club)?
Consider taking the analysis a little farther.    What happens when a new record is set by a ‘lower’ class bike that exceeds a existing record in (what should be) a faster class bike? 

An example from the car classes might be easier to illustrate.  Last year the C/BFMS record was set at 364mph which was much higher than the records in AA, A and B BFMS.   Did this new C class record in some way invalidate the records for the three ‘faster’ classes?  If someone comes out and is able to raise the record in, say A/BFMS, but not exceed 364mph C record, is that new A/BFMS record valid?

I guess my question is:  What is your definition of a "Competitive Record?"  And a follow-up question is: "What do you propose be done to assure that only competitive records are allowed?"
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Hot Rod Lincoln on August 19, 2013, 10:53:32 AM

But that’s not all.
I understand this. It’s called cherry picking. You find an open record or a slow record and run for it. But it’s hardly competitive. I give everybody credit for coming out and setting a record. It’s not the easiest thing to do, even on an open record.


Really ?  " Cherry picking "  ?

In late 2011 when we decided to find a record to break.(Yes we actually did our homework to build a car for a class to be competitive in) the listed record for FGC was 114 mph ( 2008). I thought " hell I can build a near stock Pinto to run that fast" Good thing we didn't because the record got bumped to 162.4 mph in 2011 and wasn't in the book I was looking at. Our Lincoln reset the record by 2.5 mph- 164.845.


I don't think the guys who reset the "soft" record of 114 were "Cherry Picking". they found a soft record and reset it, just like anyone else had the opportunity to do.

Records are set to be broken, we hope to reset a few more in years to come.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: firemanjim on August 19, 2013, 11:31:30 AM
Alot of the guys running smaller bikes are working as hard or harder than anyone there with some interesting "twists " on things at times. And having just as much fun!
When we first brought the 750 to the salt one of the reasons for the engine size was the  larger displacement classes had some stout records and the 750 ones were more reachable, was that cherry-picking? I call it strategy.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Kansas Bad Man on August 19, 2013, 11:43:22 AM
I am confused, or do not get the point presented. At one time all records for cars and bikes were open. Someone had to fill in the blanks. Now the open record is gone and those that want to up the speed will have to work a little harder. As far as push rod VS non-push rod, someone realized the push rod engines could not compete with overhead cam engines and divided the classes. Lump them together and the majority of push rod bikes might as well retire.
 I could be wrong and please correct me if I am. When Cliff Gullett broke the S-F 500cc record in 2008, it had been held by J. Thomas since 1958. Instead of removing Thomas' name from the record, they reclassified it to S-PF so he is still in the book. This has been talked about happening on the S-F 1000cc record. A current 1000cc overhead cam Streamliner should be able to break the record easily. If it does, the current record will be reclassified to S-PF or S-PVF so the current record holder will stay in the book.
 As far as smaller engines running faster than bigger engines, it happens every meet with cars and bikes.

In 2010 at the Bub the Vincent streamliner with side car made two passes, 212mph and 204mph.  The bike set an open record, but in my infinite wisdom I declined the record.  I felt that it was too slow for what I had.  I had clutch problems with the second run, which was the 204mph run.  We left the streamliner in Wendover, I took the clutch home to Kansas and returned to compete at WOS.  Two runs netted a 191.303mph average, which was slower than the two Bub runs.  My pit crew would've put knots on my head if I didn't take the 191.303mph record.  So that's that.  Take it for what it's worth.

                              Max 
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: bak189 on August 19, 2013, 12:03:25 PM
Bring back minimums for Bonneville...(like we had back in the 1980's).....But SCTA/BNI in their wisdom wanted more entry dollars......so all the open records in the M/C and sidecar classes......................................
PS.  How fast would these sidecar "records" have been with a passenger or the 60kg (132lbs) as required for world international speed trials??????.....................
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: rouse on August 19, 2013, 12:14:01 PM
I really don't get the point to this thread :-)

I have met a lot of good racing folks out on the salt. Each and every one seem to have dedicated a lot of time and effort into building and preparing their vehicle for racing.

It takes the same effort and thinking to build some of the 50MPH vehicles as it does for the much faster cars and bikes. To me every class has it's own challenges, and there is no way I'd belittle anyone's accomplishment to run and set a class record, no matter what the class.

I see it as do the best you can do, and if there is already an established record in the class, go after it with " both feet ".

Thankfully there are still folks that are willing to put out the effort, or the sport couldn't exist much longer.

If you don't like what's going on, maybe you should look in the mirror.

Rouse
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Jessechop on August 19, 2013, 12:33:59 PM
I really don't get the point to this thread :-)

I have met a lot of good racing folks out on the salt. Each and every one seem to have dedicated a lot of time and effort into building and preparing their vehicle for racing.

It takes the same effort and thinking to build some of the 50MPH vehicles as it does for the much faster cars and bikes. To me every class has it's own challenges, and there is no way I'd belittle anyone's accomplishment to run and set a class record, no matter what the class.

I see it as do the best you can do, and if there is already an established record in the class, go after it with " both feet ".

Thankfully there are still folks that are willing to put out the effort, or the sport couldn't exist much longer.

If you don't like what's going on, maybe you should look in the mirror.

Rouse

 :cheers:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 19, 2013, 12:57:27 PM
"It's because 29 records were bought"??  Really?  You're saying that the first ever land speed record was, because no one had run on it before, was bought?  Every record in the SCTA rule book HAD to have someone be the first to run on it.  So its safe to say that the first person to run on the AA/BFS "bought" his record.  I've run on an open record.  Did I buy it? Hell no I didn't.  I still had to make two runs and meet the tech requirements.  Had I known that open records could be bought it would have saved me a 1600 mile drive, $400 entry fee and all the expenses that go with Bonneville.  I could have simply asked Tom to mail me my record cert. 
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 19, 2013, 01:29:51 PM
I bought several of my records with 8 years of labor, many thousands of dollars, 1900 miles driving each way, weeks on the salt, blood, sweat, tears, lost vacation time, injuries, etc. 

Some years I paid all of that and did NOT get the record I thought I paid for!

Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stainless1 on August 19, 2013, 01:34:02 PM
Well Dean is doing his job... stirred the scooter pot and got y'all talking and thinking.  We all know open records should be a piece of cake... know folks that didn't get 2 in a row or didn't take the vehicle to impound because it wasn't fast enough.  
Everyone cherry picks... we had some soft ones, lost them and started taking them on again, it's part of racing on the salt.  
Keep racing....
see ya on the salt  8-)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: bitpusher on August 19, 2013, 01:59:36 PM
call it cherry picking or whatever you want.

everyone who is in the book has made great effort at great expense to build a bike, get it to the salt, pass tech and risk injury to  make the passes.

i cannot understand why anyone would want to throw shade on that.

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 19, 2013, 03:13:56 PM
Well Dean is doing his job... stirred the scooter pot and got y'all talking and thinking.

All I got out of it was what I took to be a attempt to cast a shadow of doubt/credibility on those who ran on open records.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: JimL on August 19, 2013, 03:55:40 PM

Entering on an Open record doesnt mean an easy deal.  My first Bonneville I entered on a 500 PS record that was 101 (bikes were slower then).  That one came pretty simple with a 121+ number.  The open record I entered in unstreamlined 500 turned into a week long battle with the new Kawasaki triples and the Triumph boys from Detroit.  I went home with that one, barely... and read with disgust...the magazine articles telling all about the "cherry picking".  It never mentioned things like the Detroit boys giving me their last pair of plugs so I could barely beat their number!

There's wind and bad salt and gremlins in the machine.  Right after the other guys that show up unexpectedly, there might be some easier records.  While I havent had a shot at an open record in 15 years, I still get tired of hearing that "cherry picking" term. :x  If somebody is bothered by an open record, be it bike or car, build and compete.  Just remember that some of those unusual classes have some real engineering challenges that are scale related.  Nothing will be learned if nobody tries.

Tired and cranky and it shows today! :x
JimL

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 19, 2013, 05:46:28 PM
I think one point made is that there's not much need for additional bike classes -- such as 1, 2, 3, 4-cyl. divisions along with 2, 4 and 5(Isky)-stroke classes.  There are enuf holes to put your pigeon in.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: desotoman on August 19, 2013, 06:23:27 PM
I think one point made is that there's not much need for additional bike classes -- such as 1, 2, 3, 4-cyl. divisions along with 2, 4 and 5(Isky)-stroke classes.  There are enuf holes to put you pigeon in.

Stan,

I got one of them Isky 5 cycle cams, not for a Motorcycle though, for a DeSoto Hemi, can I add a new engine class for AIR.   :-D :cheers:

Tom G.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: edinlr on August 19, 2013, 06:50:33 PM
I prepared a 1983 Honda CX650 turbo to run in P-PPB and also in some of the modified classes.  The production record was on an open record, but there was also another bike entered into the class too.  He went about 5 mph faster than I did and he got the record.  I now have a year to bitch at myself for not preparing hard enough for the class, but there is always next year.  I was also about a mile off of the modified records, so they are on the target for next year too.  It is foolish to think that if you just go out and spend thousands on a bike, hours of labor, and then take off work and travel for days, to think you will automatically get a record.  I knew that going in, but made the commitment to go out there just the same.  
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: generatorshovel on August 19, 2013, 06:53:50 PM


Quote


But that’s not all.
I understand this. It’s called cherry picking. You find an open record or a slow record and run for it. But it’s hardly competitive. I give everybody credit for coming out and setting a record. It’s not the easiest thing to do, even on an open record.


Weren't ALL records open once ?
My blood boils when reading this dribble !
I bought a record once, and promptly "gave it away" by allowing a 16 y/o team member to ride my bike, upping the record by 9 mph.
This "soft" record still stands (A/F 175) today, and as soon as someone "buys it" I'll buy it back. having spent a fortune for the privilege.
Tiny
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 19, 2013, 07:26:10 PM
Tom --

Too bad Tony Waters ain't around any more -- bet he could help you.

Have you thought of changing to a 2-stroke?

Stan
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dakin Engineering on August 19, 2013, 07:44:21 PM
Yup, I did it.
I saw an open record and bought it.
"Bought it" as in a bike I had already invested more in modifications than the retail showroom price. (I had a drag racing problem, got over it.)
BTW, drag bikes don't do well on the Salt.

That as 12 years ago.

In the meantime, I have designed, built, rode, and set records.
Various classes, I admit.
Every one cost the same to enter. Just like every other vehicle.

But there are 5 more turbo Sportsters coming to World of Speed this year.
A couple are sidecar. Maybe I had a hand to encourage them to try.

Look for #6062 to bump the record,
Sam
USFRA

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: joea on August 19, 2013, 08:41:30 PM
modified:...too much sensitivity to commit my response...

at the end of the day......your/our satisfaction with what occurred is its own measure of success...

how its viewed by others may be another realm altogether...
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Gu11ett on August 19, 2013, 10:32:19 PM
As far as disparity-
 How about the fact cars guys can run almost any engine they want-car, bike, atv, sled, jet, etc. Yet motorcycles are limited to motorcycle only engines.
 If the rules are changed so cars can only use car engines, there would be lots of records for the car guys to "buy" or "cherry pick".
Or the concerned individual could build a bike himself.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Hot Rod Lincoln on August 20, 2013, 12:53:42 AM
As far as disparity-
 How about the fact cars guys can run almost any engine they want-car, bike, atv, sled, jet, etc. Yet motorcycles are limited to motorcycle only engines.
If the rules are changed so cars can only use car engines, there would be lots of records for the car guys to "buy" or "cherry pick".
Or the concerned individual could build a bike himself.

are you drinking tonight ? What are you talking about maybe 5% of the car classes if not less?
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: wobblywalrus on August 20, 2013, 02:02:53 AM
The absolutly most horribly difficult record I ever set was 98+ mph on an open record in 1000cc MPS-P...
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: lsrjunkie on August 20, 2013, 09:57:00 AM
WOW! I am not a bike guy in any way shape or form, but this is crazy to me. As long as I have known about land speed racing, or Bonneville, I was under the assumption that you went there to do one thing. Prove to yourself the vehicle that you designed and built was fast. To prove your ideas in a real world situation. I'd bet a few bucks that's how Mr. Munro got there. There was many men and women a lot less well known before and after him chasing the same things. I'm building a car right now. Do I hope it's fast? Hell yes! Will it be? I don't know. It's just something that I want to do. Prove to myself that I can do it. If I get a record along the way then great. I understand everybody would like to hold a record, I sure would. The problem is we can't all have a record. There has to be a second place. it's just how the world works. I just hope we don't start to lose sight of why we started doing this. In my case, for the plain and simple fact that I want to go fast!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Vinsky on August 20, 2013, 10:10:59 AM
The absolutly most horribly difficult record I ever set was 98+ mph on an open record in 1000cc MPS-P...
Wobbly, you think that was difficult??? We upped the 100cc APS-BF with a 1967 Yamaha 3 speed trail bike motor
from 49mph set in 2008 to 91mph and out the back door at 99+.  Can't wait for someone to break that one.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: RacerX9623 on August 20, 2013, 12:29:29 PM
If the record is open it means no one had ever built one of those. I applaud anyone that is doing something different.
That is what land speed is about. Doing something and doing something new. That is what will also keep the sport alive.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: nrhs sales on August 20, 2013, 12:38:12 PM
I can pretty much guarantee that if you put pushrod engines into the same class as overhead cam engines you would see motorcycle participation drop by at least 30% which would in now way be good for the sport. I know I would not participate as I have no interest in Japanese or European bikes.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 20, 2013, 05:12:16 PM
So you're saying that records are the incentive to run -- more than just seeing how fast you can go?
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: nrhs sales on August 20, 2013, 05:33:53 PM
yes I am saying that I would not race if there were no records available.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: lsrjunkie on August 20, 2013, 06:50:43 PM
I would run no matter the record.

It's very nice to have a great group of volunteers, again I say volunteers, to tell me how fast I went, keep record of that speed and implement some safety regulations to keep me from killing my fool self.

But again, for me it's seeing how fast I can go, not how much faster I am than the next guy.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 20, 2013, 09:27:35 PM
I agree with NRHS Sales.  I don't think I would go to Bonneville if I were not racing against a record, even an open record. Going to Bonneville is just too much of a costly effort if the goal is "to have fun." I can have lots more fun if I were to spend $1000's and a whole years effort to have that fun. There are lots more fun things to do than to stand in line for a week in order to make a few 2 minute runs.

Racing is a competition. There has to be a goal to beat the other guy. Without competition there can be no innovation. Going to Bonneville merely to "have fun" reminds me of the kids sports teams where there is no winner at the end of the game. Everyone gets an orange slice.

Would bowling be fun if you rolled the ball down the alley but the pins were behind a black curtain? You rolled the ball, wasn't that enough fun?  Why do you need to know your score? When you go to a football game don't you want your team to win?

It is called Land Speed Racing. Racing means you compete to win. If you have fun while doing it, great. But that is not the goal. Getting the record is.
Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 20, 2013, 10:01:02 PM
So I guess we should have more record opportunities.  The bikes now have almost double the number that cars do.  Maybe the cars should all add a sidecar class and double up to catch up. 

I remember (?), i think it was JD years ago, that said we might consider using our entry number for our record.  And every time ol' 5669 went faster, he had a new record.

Jim Lattin would take issue with this -- I think he runs four vehicles under #69 from time to time.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 20, 2013, 10:07:42 PM
I believe there was "pulling a trailer with an engine in it but not hooked up or running and get a record with it" class a few years ago.  I don't think it caught on.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stainless1 on August 20, 2013, 10:21:22 PM
Jeez Dean, think you stirred the pot enough this time... Seems you have pissed off a few of your fellow bikers...

My thoughts
Going as fast as you can is great  :-D
Going faster than someone else can is better  :-o
 :cheers:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: jimwebb on August 20, 2013, 11:07:30 PM
There are no easy or 'bought' records at Bonneville. If the record comes easy, it will fall sooner. We don't own 'em, we just hold 'em for a while.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Gu11ett on August 20, 2013, 11:08:37 PM
As far as disparity-
 How about the fact cars guys can run almost any engine they want-car, bike, atv, sled, jet, etc. Yet motorcycles are limited to motorcycle only engines.
If the rules are changed so cars can only use car engines, there would be lots of records for the car guys to "buy" or "cherry pick".
Or the concerned individual could build a bike himself.

are you drinking tonight ? What are you talking about maybe 5% of the car classes if not less?

Nope, not drinking. I just think there are few car engines for the H,I,J,K engine classes-therefore it would be hard to set a record without the bike engines. That would translate to some open/soft records.
 I am not trying to fan the fire, just trying to understand the original post.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 20, 2013, 11:13:26 PM
  Maybe the cars should all add a sidecar class

If you do Stan you might get to be on French TV.  All it takes is three wheels.

http://videos.tf1.fr/auto-moto/plein-phare-sur-la-speed-week-de-bonneville-2013-8248733.html
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Peter Jack on August 21, 2013, 12:31:16 AM
  Maybe the cars should all add a sidecar class

If you do Stan you might get to be on French TV.  All it takes is three wheels.

http://videos.tf1.fr/auto-moto/plein-phare-sur-la-speed-week-de-bonneville-2013-8248733.html

You looked good Bill!  :-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: RansomT on August 21, 2013, 06:52:55 AM
So I guess we should have more record opportunities.  The bikes now have almost double the number that cars do.  Maybe the cars should all add a sidecar class and double up to catch up. 

I remember (?), i think it was JD years ago, that said we might consider using our entry number for our record.  And every time ol' 5669 went faster, he had a new record.

Jim Lattin would take issue with this -- I think he runs four vehicles under #69 from time to time.

We all have the same record opportunities.  Stan, do what I did 10 years ago. Stop racing cars and build a bike.  No one is stopping ya....  :-D
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: doug on August 21, 2013, 04:25:57 PM
Not to beat the horse or flog the dog, but here are some statistics for all.  I think there will never be an end to the cars v bikes opinions.  This is the first time since 2006 (maybe ever?), that there were more bike records than car records.  Based on the stats, it is an anomaly.  However, the numbers have been trending that way.  I am sure there are many theories on why that is.

I found a few interesting items.  More than half (58%) of the bike records were either late entry or class changes.  For car records, 43% of the records were that way.
93 bike records
pre-entry 39
post entry(on site or class change) 54

58 car records
pre-entry  33
post entry(on site or class change) 25

Here is a table of Speed Week since 2006 (2013 number of course are not finalized).



Car Entries
Car Records

Bike Entries
Bike Records

Total Entries
Total Records

Timed Runs

% cars that set a record
% bikes that set a record

2006

330
122

103
72

433
194

2018

37%
70%
2007

381
96

181
77

562
173

2278

25%
43%
2008

368
110

162
65

530
175

2488

30%
40%
2009

381
132

179
107

560
239

3108

35%
60%
2010

381
105

180
58

561
163

2852

28%
32%
2011

368
94

198
69

566
163

3152

26%
35%
2012

384
89

202
76

586
165

3050

23%
38%
2013
pending
373
58

208
93

581
151

2728

16%
45%
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

total
2966
806

1413
617

4379
1423

21674



avg
370.75
100.75

176.625
77.125

547.375
177.875

2709.25

27%
44%


This table is this years bike records. I included the existing record, how many times the record was bumped and whether it was bumped by the existing holder.  There are a few errors in the table. I am sure some of this will change once the SCTA is done with it. Enjoy.

#

1962B
7960B
1960B
1476B
476B
977B
8269B
1648B
735B
931B
2931B
376B
286B
3286B
3751B
375B
823B
3523B
1016B
9011B
901B
7134B
810B
5154B
1358B
3358B
445B
3358B
3350B
4451B
370B
3399B
574B
474B
571B
579B
576B
679B
6779B
7053B
7052B
740B
3414B
2169B
2469B
3419B
3418B
1800B
1803B
9876B
536B
7865B
1134B
8761B
7734B
876B
621B
1621B
1602B
5777B
5779B
5771B
5778B
8658B
8688B
865B
8608B
969B
867B
330B
209B J
837B
 540B
1627B
4158B
4997B
9317B
632B
1189B
665B
1021B
1580B
1582B
194B
1141B
1581B
797B
858B
7919B
8080B
8081B
1114B
1102B
3412B
1110B
1856B
6661B
Engine

100 CC
100 CC
100 CC
100 CC
100 CC
1000 CC
1000 CC
1000 CC
1000 CC
1000 CC
1000 CC
125 CC
125 CC
125 CC
125 CC
125 CC
125 CC
125 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1350 CC
1650 CC
1650 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
175 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
2000 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
250 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
350 CC
500 CC
500 CC
500 CC
500 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
650 CC
750 CC
750 CC
750 CC
750 CC
750 CC
U
Body

APS-VF
SC-VF
SC-VG
APS-BF
APS-BG
?
APS-F
APS-F
M-PBF
MPS-VBF
MPS-VBG
APS-VG
MPS-BF
MPS-BG
MPS-VF
MPS-VG
M-VF
M-VG
APS-PG
APS-VF
APS-VG
A-VG
M-PBG
MPS-PG
MPS-VBF
MPS-VBG
MPS-VG
M-VBF
M-VBG
M-VG
A-PBF
APS-PG
SC-PF
SC-PG
A-PG
APS-PF
APS-PG
M-BF
MPS-BF
MPS-VG
M-VF
P-P
A-BG
A-PF
A-PG
APS-BF
APS-BG
SC-BF
SC-BG
SC-PF
A-PF
A-VF
M-BG
M-PF
MPS-BG
MPS-PF
MPS-VF
M-VF
SC-G
A-PBF
A-PBG
APS-PBF
APS-PBG
APS-VF
APS-VG
A-VF
A-VG
M-BF
M-BG
MPS-BF
MPS-BF
MPS-BG
SC-VF
SC-VF
SC-VG
A-VF
A-VF
MPS-BG
SC-VG
 P-PP
P-P
A-PF
A-PG
APS-PBG
APS-PF
APS-PF
MPS-PF
P-P
SC-PG
SCS-F
SCS-G
A-PBF
A-PBG
M-PBG
P-PPB
SC-PFG
A-PBG
Entry Name

SALINE TYSON
SALINE TYSON
SALINE TYSON
TRI-MAC SPEEDSTERS
TRI-MAC SPEEDSTERS
PFLUM & WAGNER RACING
JIM HOOGERHYDE SFMC
SAN DIEGO MOTORCYCLES
DAVE ARNOLD
PAUL FRIEBUS
PAUL FRIEBUS
STEPHEN ROBERTS
BMAC LAND SPEED RACING
BMAC LAND SPEED RACING
KARL MEREDITH
KARL MEREDITH
PRAIRIE DRIFTERS
TIM MC LAUGHLIN
DESTINATION/HUFF
DOUBLE VISION
DOUBLE VISION
PERFORMANCE INDIAN
LAURENT DUTRUEL
TEAM SUBTLE CROWBAR
BONNEVILLE BOBBER
BONNEVILLE BOBBER
BOB LEWIS
BONNEVILLE BOBBER
BONNEVILLE BOBBER
BOB LEWIS
O.M.R.A. BIKE #1
TEAM BENNETT LSR
DAROLD CUMMINGS
DAROLD CUMMINGS
DAROLD CUMMINGS
DAROLD CUMMINGS
DAROLD CUMMINGS
JOHN STONER-NO SENSE LSR
JOHN STONER-NO SENSE LSR
RETARDED SPARKS SPECIAL
RETARDED SPARKS SPECIAL
PIT BULL
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
JAY ALLEN RACING
JAY ALLEN RACING
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
GOLD WING LYON
GOLD WING LYON  KUBO
SPERANZA BRANT ROBINSDON
SPORTSMAN FLYER
ECOLE DE LA PERFORMANCE
RED CUP SCREAMER
CANTER/ROSENTHAL RACING
RED CUP SCREAMER
CANTER/ROSENTHAL RACING
BROOKS MOTOR WORKS
BROOKS MOTOR WORKS
COREY BERTELSEN 0842
KAMPHIUS AUNT MARIA
KAMPHIUS LANAPOTTR
KAMPHIUS TL KELLY
KAMPHIUS FRANK Z
ECOLE DE LA PERFORMANCE 32110
ECOLE DE LA PERFORMANCE 32110
ECOLE DE LA PERFORMANCE 32110
ECOLE DE LA PERFORMANCE 32110
XN RACING
XN RACING
LOUIS WILSON
XN RACING
XN RACING
SCOTT BAXTER
BROOKS MOTOR WORKS
BROOKS MOTOR WORKS
SALINE TURNER-KTC
PAUL FRIEBUS
LE TOP RACING
BROOKS MOTOR WORKS
BULLET
SHUNJI YOKOKAWA
MARC LEININGER
MARC LEININGER
OLD AGE & TREACHERY LSR
ANDERS JONSSON
JIM LEININGER
DAN WAGNER
BUTLER / ACAT RACING
BILL ANDERSON
COSTELLA,CUNHA& BASSANO
COSTELLA,CUNHA& BASSANO
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
SCOTT GUTHRIE RACING
RICHARD KRCZAL
STONEY FRITZ
Old Record

open
open
open
48.910
81.869
?
218.323
218.323
125.922
open
open
open
open
open
32.052
42.239
53.441
43.449
177.998
135.438
128.241
132.338
155.897
172.849
open
open
160.078
open
open
151.835
86.953
172.591
68.358
68.661
72.285
72.753
71.319
open
open
open
open
99.700
172.627
169.309
169.966
open
170.465
99.058
87.947
146.196
78.048
86.715
98.475
79.198
99.445
80.758
open
75.359
120.016
open
15.851
open
open
97.511
81.903
97.511
88.830
open
100.294
open
open
102.643
open
open
48.879
110.152
110.152
120.507
94.330
106.490
165.994
123.814
126.976
117.871
128.231
128.231
133.998
165.994
121.042
open
open
96.091
111.791
129.134
open
open
open
Bump 1
*own record
**42.179
30.469
36.744
**91.659
84.533
**185.25
221.583

*126.231
168.652
**167.944
79.220
40.357
**43.526
**82.494
75.106
**57.533
52.353
**181.397
**151.448
140.210
148.012
158.642
173.163
**149.676
**152.622
150.998
**159.42
150.548
149.496
97.916
196.843
**75.009
**74.175
**80.453
**84.324
**84.476
**75.828
73.086
**49.727
50.049
104.449
**190.736
**169.33
**172.414
**220.595
**215.853
*115.763
**97.264
**162.424
80.438
**92.221
126.607
83.148
**127.714
**85.816
82.486
**79.55
**133.324
**97.964
**96.975
**93.474
**98.873
**101.812
**86.818
106.622
**105.673
**119.103
**120.097
115.015

**121.178
68.421
**78.318
**78.428
110.729

**143.298
*106.719
**106.601
**170.828
**134.849
**130.713
110.352
*130.181

**135.891
167.319
121.553
176.547
**197.036
**128.822
**130.208
**131.298
133.625
**91.286
174.742
Bump 2
**not pre-entered







**222.756


**180.659
84.440



79.059
**61.327





















































123.115





**111.839








156.389

169.684







Bump 3







222.850
















































































170.654








Increase

x
x
x
42.749
2.664
x
3.260
4.433
0.309
x
x
x
x
x
50.442
36.820
7.886
8.904
3.399
16.010
11.969
15.674
2.745
0.314
x
x
-9.080
x
x
-2.339
10.963
24.252
6.651
5.514
8.168
11.571
13.157
x
x
x
x
4.749
18.109
0.021 :-o
2.448
x
45.388
16.705
9.317
16.228
2.390
5.506
28.132
3.950
28.269
5.058
x
4.191
13.308
x
81.124
x
x
4.301
4.915
9.111
16.843
x
19.803
x
x
18.535
x
x
29.549
0.577
1.687
22.791
12.389
0.111
4.834
11.035
3.737
-7.519
1.950
28.158
1.893
4.660
0.511
x
x
32.731
18.417
2.164
x
x
x
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: SaltPeter on August 21, 2013, 05:03:43 PM
So I guess we should have more record opportunities.  The bikes now have almost double the number that cars do.  Maybe the cars should all add a sidecar class and double up to catch up.  

I remember (?), i think it was JD years ago, that said we might consider using our entry number for our record.  And every time ol' 5669 went faster, he had a new record.

Jim Lattin would take issue with this -- I think he runs four vehicles under #69 from time to time.

I don't understand the point of this thread and I don't agree with the claims about Open Records.

I also don't get this quote :? I found this when I checked the Classes.

Cars                                               Bikes

Mod Roadster                             Production
Rear Engine Modified Roadster        Modified
Fuel-Gas Roadster                       Modified Partial Streamlined
Street Roadster                          Special Construction
Competition Coupe                      Special Construction Partial Streamlined
Altered Coupe                            Streamliner
Coupe                                       Sidecar
Vintage Oval Track                      Sidecar Streamliner
Midget Vintage Oval Track
Competition Ute
Altered Ute
Modified Coupe
Modified Ute
Modified Sports
Modified Pickup Truck
Modified Mid/Mini Pickup Truck
Production Coupe And Sedan
Production Ute
Grand Touring Sport
Production Pickup Truck
Production Mid/Mini Pickup Truck
Unlimited Diesel Truck
Modified Diesel Truck
Highway Hauler
Diesel Truck
Streamliner
Lakester


When you compare Car and Bike Classification it's not really straight forward.

Clearly Cars have more Vehicle Configurations while the Bikes have more Engine choices.

It's Chalk and Cheese, Apples and Oranges.......

We all run what we can, according to our preference and our budget, but in the end we are all simply trying to go fast.

As far as Records go, that's what defines us as a Motorsport, it what draws me to this Sport.

The great thing is, you can pretty much run anything, and you get your Speed recorded and if that is the aim then that's cool.

My Budget determined that I could actually compete if I ran a Bike.

From there I chose, based on my past knowledge and for me the best Bang for the Buck, a 250 2 stroke, and the plan was to evolve, Prod to Mod to Special Construction.  

This did not go quiet to plan as we had the Rain outs in 2011/12.

I ended up running an open Record twice simply because over here in Oz most of the 250 classes just happen to be Open. That is changing and the race is on.

Stay Cool

Pete  :cheers:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Koncretekid on August 21, 2013, 06:03:38 PM
In reply to Dean's opening comments on this thread, I applaud your attention to detail with the records.  Very interesting.  If you have time, another interesting table would be one showing all the classes with open records, for bikes and for cars.  I think this would help newbies decide on what classes to build for, and to possibly get more people into our sport.

As many of us vintage bike racers have experienced, the worst thing that can happen to an organization is to start deleting some of the classes.  An example of this is the Period 2 Vintage bike racing in the Maritimes in Canada.  A few years ago a new organization took over the running of our races and promptly eliminated all classes before 1982, and all motor sizes under 500 cc.  The result was that about a dozen of us were left without a race class.  All but a couple of us have quit completely (and I essentially have) and there are now fewer racers competing.  Which means fewer people to pay the bills.

I never met a motorized vehicle that didn't interest me.

Tom

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 21, 2013, 06:12:38 PM
We're now on page four and still no one has told me where I can buy one (or more) of these records  I'm not getting any younger.  The trip to Bonneville isn't getting any shorter.  The sidecar isn't getting any faster.  So where the hell can I buy some of these records????
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 21, 2013, 09:30:10 PM
Ask "Dean Los Angeles" where you can buy records. Evidently he knows the secret to buying records with no effort at all.

I would advise you to buy several records at a time. That way you don't have to keep making the trip to Bonneville every year.

Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: makr on August 21, 2013, 10:37:54 PM
Excellent troll thread.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: desotoman on August 21, 2013, 11:59:59 PM
I have no dog in this fight. In fact I am part owner in a bike that set 3 or 4 records at Bonneville on open records. At El Mirage we set an open record also but it did have a minimum speed we had to go over to set the record.

I could be off a few but I just counted and there are 975 possible Bike records, and there are 803 possible car records.

I could be completely wrong but I think the car guys don't understand why there are so many engine classes in the bike category, with so few cc between.

Tom G.

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on August 22, 2013, 01:10:05 AM
It looks like Dean has not been back on landracing since shortly after he started this thread.

I reread his post several times trying to comprehend what he was getting at.

I think I got his point but I don't agree with some of his comments.

I was a little angry and refrained from posting until the anger past.

At this point, I hope he continues to contribute to this site.

He is entitled to his opinion just as the rest of us are entitled to ours.

That said, this was a fantastic Speedweek for us, Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: wobblywalrus on August 22, 2013, 01:27:42 AM
Tom, the displacement classes are a tradition that goes way back to the engine sizes they made in the old days.  As an example, 50's, 100's and 175's are rare now.  They once were popular sizes for production bikes.  There is a big difference between these displacements percentage wise.  As a result, there are multiple classes.  This is the same for 250's, 350's, 500's, and 650's.  All of these were very popular displacements at one time and the distinctions between them were important.

Bike displacement is like the height of dress hemlines and tie widths.  The manufacturers constantly change the popular displacements so they appear to be fresh and innovative.  1,100 cc was a popular displacement a few w years back.  Now 400cc and 800cc are popular sizes.     
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: JimL on August 22, 2013, 01:51:37 AM
Had a little fun looking through the records list on SCTA.  There are duplicates of some classes, where it shows up to four records in the same class.  After working it out, it looks like 77 new bike records.

Curiously, 30 of them are in Vintage classes with H-D accounting for 10 and AMC getting 8.  Various brands fill this out.

Pushrod classes have 30 new records, Honda with 9 (only one less than 650cc), and Gilera and Buell with 5 each.  There were 10 different brands in this group.

Ohc and two-strokes had 17 records, Honda 7 and Yamaha 6.

Pushrods account for the most variety, tie for the most records, and have a larger proportion of engines above 500cc compared to Vintage.

Top two brands are H-D vintage and Honda pushrod (one 250 single and eight CX650 based engines in 650 and 750 classes.)

I might have a couple errors, it gets confusing after a while.  There arent many holes left to fill, and pushrod and ohc classes are getting pretty tough.  We managed 4 with our destroked 650 Honda pushrod twins,and both bikes left the salt with hurt engines.  Raising our rev lmit past 12,000 did not come without penalty, it seems, but I am real happy with that 163.829 return run on Sunday morning!

see you again, if'n I can find more blocks. :-(

Regards, JimL

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: edinlr on August 22, 2013, 03:13:49 PM
After reading Doug's post #46 with the breakdown between cars and bikes, it is obvious that cars are not doing their part to set records!  :-D  Actually, it appears that car entries have leveled out, so the potential new records might have stabilized a bit too.  With the rise in bike entries, it is somewhat logical that they might get more records.  With the economy the way it has been, it is much cheaper to own and race a bike than a car.  When we got back from Bonneville this year, I went through all my costs for a "new" 1983 bike, a "new" 2001 trailer, gear, parts, 10 day's travel, gas, etc. and it was about $16,000.  Heck, this wouldn't pay for most of the car guy's engines, much less an race entire budget.  Oh, and $16,000 didn't "buy" me a record.  :oops:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: 38flattie on August 22, 2013, 05:11:49 PM

It’s because 29 of the records were bought. As soon as they paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.

But that’s not all.
I understand this. It’s called cherry picking. You find an open record or a slow record and run for it. But it’s hardly competitive.

Dean, I'm sure you're just stirring the pot, and you did a fine job! Lol!

I run a car, not a bike, but please tell me the above comment was simply to incite the masses, and not what you truly believe?

We set 2 records last year-both were open. Just to get to the salt took an extreme amount of work, as well you know. Both were in vintage classes.

This year, we ran in what should be faster classes, modified fuel classes, and upped the BFALT record. Guess what? The vintage gas records are both higher than the fuel class.

So, we 'bought' 2 records, and 'earned' the slower one? Maybe if we work harder, someday someone will think we are competitive?

Strangely, we worked for over 2 years to 'buy' those first records, and only 51 weeks to 'earn' a record! :evil:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: SaltPeter on August 22, 2013, 05:36:52 PM

I could be completely wrong but I think the car guys don't understand why there are so many engine classes in the bike category, with so few cc between.

Tom G.



It is deceiving when you look at Engine Capacities, while it might not appear to be that much cc difference, percentage wise it's a different story.

I did some calculations and it appears that both Car and Bike Engine Classes except at the Smallest and Largest Capacities, have about a 20-30% spread between each Class.

It's just that, as Wobbly said, the engine sizes available to Bikes is simply greater.

You can still get 50cc Bikes and you can also get a 2300cc Bike. That's 4500% increase in capacity.

In the end Bikes and Cars, what difference does it make we can run either or both, and set Records or run for Speed.

Pete :cheers:

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 23, 2013, 09:47:54 AM
...It’s because 29 of the records were bought. As soon as they paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.
..... It’s called cherry picking....

Really ?

I must admit that when I read it I went:

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/Dafuq.gif)

Da'fq ??? ( pardon my 'French' )


Here's a news-flash for you: nothing is black/white...there are all sorts of shades of grey.

I'm one of them who according to you 'bought' a record.
First of all ; when I started out I had no clue if there was a record in my class.
In fact I thought I was to run in another class until I was told that my bike
wasn't a 'P' ( push-rod ) but a 'V' (Vintage) because my good ole' Indian have
very short ( apparently NON-) push-rods.

I spend 1½-years of my spare-time and every available cent I made, building the bike...put it in a box..
air-freight it a billion miles across the Atlantic...with the truely invaluable help from the best people in the world
run it at Bonneville...fail miserably...freight it back....spend another year building..
..air-freight it over the big pond again...run it with some success...ESTABLISH a record

...and I 'bought' that ???

Care to check how I 'bought' that ?
Be my guest:

http://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php/topic,5849.0.html

Sorry if this makes me ever so tinybittyslightly...how can I put it?....'miffed'.


OK enough of this. Gotta get going updating my build-thread:

http://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php/topic,13079.0.html

BTW: I have NO clue if there is a record in the class that my new bike will run in.
That is not what this is about for me....yes: really !
You can applaud that, you can shake your head at that , you can choose not believe what I just said.
I don't give a flying f...f....front-fork.

It's the gawdhonest truth.

WHEN eventually I check to see if there IS a record, and if it turns out there ISN'T one,
I may have to change the name of the bike, and the thread, to:

'The Worlds Fastest Cherrypicker'

.....and of course be truly ashamed of myself.


Right





BTW: for EVERY SINGLE class ( and there's a WHOLE LOT of them) in which there is a record, there must at one point back,
have been a 'Cherrypicket' who established that.
Maybe we should make a club ?
Instead of being ashamed, we could be real bold and proud, and call it

'The Salt Pioneers Club'
'Those Who Dared First Club'
' The 'Feel Free To Beat My' Club'
or perhaps
the 'If It's SO Darn Easy, Why Don't You Do It-Club'

Ha, ha, ha...this is SO silly !
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 23, 2013, 10:25:31 AM
Damn Octane, I like you! 


I am a member of the ECCPA Wilmington Ohio chapter.

I have “pollinated” the record book with my bought records. It’s my money! AND I am having a blast spending my kids inheritance. 
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: SabreTooth on August 23, 2013, 11:40:44 PM
Da'fq ??? ( pardon my 'French' )

Your French is impeccable. That's freakin' hilarious. Thanks for the laugh and way to beat Slim's "spell checker."

'The Worlds Fastest Cherrypicker'

I like "Odin's Fury" way better. Way to have you back Lars. :-D

I do appreciate the various technical dissection of the records. I've been analysing the present records and other available information to see what makes a fast bike to learn more and perhaps apply what I observe and I have to say, what I see is pretty interesting. So despite some of the negativity, the discussion IS interesting so thanks to Dean for getting this thread, er, started.

Jim
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stainless1 on August 24, 2013, 10:52:41 AM
Hey guys, while Dean started the stir of the pot, we are all involved...
If anyone out there has not cherry picked a record... step up and declare your innocence
I think everyone getting into this actually looks at what they think is doable.  That is the definition of cherry picking... find the low hanging fruit and try to grab it.  It is not as easy as a lot of folks think it might be, it is not cheap no matter what you run and every record is the new "bar" that the next cherry picker will reach for.

When we attacked the 1000cc bike class we had every intention of taking the record, held the P-P for several years, moved to modified, did well, rules moved us to SC (A), did better, had the first NA 1000 gas bike over 200, and then a club record for the kid.... this was a 6 year moving target (2 club) exercise in perseverance.

If you are a one and done, challenged an open record and won... then you are not a Bonneville racer... you are just one of the many visitors the flats get every year, you paid to go down the course.  You can brag on your record until someone else runs on it and takes it. 

I do not say this to make your record less important, I say it because as most of us know, LSR is a lifestyle, that is what Bonneville racers do, we go back and race.  Maybe that is what Dean was trying to get started, hell I don't pretend to know what goes on in Dean's mind, I don't really know him that well, except that I know he is a racer...
 :cheers:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Jodar on August 24, 2013, 11:19:04 AM
Decided to post on thread when Lars showed up. I was a part of the crew on his Indian effort and still remember the big Thrill Of Victory grin.

The initial post by dean struck me as an unwelcome unrequested attempt to denigrate motorcycles - the good ol' car boy mindset that motorcycles have no place in land speed racing. In years past this was known as the "quiltier than thou" syndrome. Sad stuff indeed.

Lars, you would have enjoyed our epic struggle this year. We had several somewhat-valid excuses including wet salt, bad coil and a tiring engine, but were in the end most appreciative of the last-chance record.

As usual, I had to more than once remind Bill to clean up his act. :-D

We're looking forward to seeing you snatch another record when you come back. Keep in touch --

Cheers, Joe
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: dw230 on August 24, 2013, 11:40:39 AM
As a point of education, Dean is a bike guy. Formally an accomplished kart racer he then built an ran a laydown bike before leaving So Cal for the farm country of Fresno, I think.

DW
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Jodar on August 24, 2013, 01:03:39 PM
Thanks for the enlightenment -

I still find the post puzzling, though. Perhaps I missed the point - as did a few others here.

No big deal :roll:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: fredvance on August 24, 2013, 01:13:49 PM
We came to Speedweek for what we thought would be a slam dunk. Running on a 25 year old 225 record. Vincent vs Busa. No problem, right? Wrong!! Same body we ran 235+, 40hp more, 30lbs more torque. Wet salt, other minor gremlins and no record :-(. I did have fun! We will try again next year. That is Bonneville.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 24, 2013, 02:13:17 PM
I think the points that Dean made were valid ones . . .

Fuel should be faster than Gas
Blown should be faster than Unblown
Bigger should be faster than Smaller
Streamlined should be faster than un- or Partially Streamlined,
Etc. and more etc. for combinations thereof.

Works for cars, too.

I also think the bike and car record counting doesn't matter as much as the bike and car Open Record counting which is too complicated for me to figure out.  That would be a significant disparity.

Stan Back
. . . and be prepared for more.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on August 24, 2013, 02:47:02 PM
I think the points that Dean made were valid ones . . .

Fuel should be faster than Gas
Blown should be faster than Unblown
Bigger should be faster than Smaller
Streamlined should be faster than un- or Partially Streamlined,
Etc. and more etc. for combinations thereof.

Works for cars, too.

I also think the bike and car record counting doesn't matter as much as the bike and car Open Record counting which is too complicated for me to figure out.  That would be a significant disparity.

Stan Back
. . . and be prepared for more.


In a perfect world.

 Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: joea on August 24, 2013, 03:15:13 PM
Dean made a ALOT of really good points...!!!!!!!!!

the data isnt HIS... the FACTS speak for itself.....

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Saltfever on August 24, 2013, 05:04:51 PM
(edit . . . ) If you are a one and done, challenged an open record and won... then you are not a Bonneville racer... you are just one of the many visitors the flats get every year, you paid to go down the course.   You can brag on your record until someone else runs on it and takes it.  I do not say this to make your record less important, I say it because as most of us know, LSR is a lifestyle, that is what Bonneville racers do, we go back and race.

Nicely said, Stainless. I have been trying to find those words for years. You couldn't have defined it any better!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 24, 2013, 05:20:23 PM
Dean made a ALOT of really good points...!!!!!!!!!

That's nice, but funnily enough , NO similar 'cherry-picking' "facts" about
cars establishing open records are presented...mmmmm....why's that ?

Quote
the data isnt HIS... the FACTS speak for itself.....

That's nice, but
"..the records were bought. As soon as they paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.
..It’s called cherry picking
..."

..those sentiments are not 'facts'. Those are opinions.
NO-one's arguing the facts. We're arguing the opinions expressed.
Some of us find them totally misguided and somewhat unpleasantly condescending.
We can do that. That's one of the advantages of not living in North Korea
but in the free world

.-)


...........................................................................................

Decided to post on thread when Lars showed up. I was a part of the crew on his Indian effort and still remember the big Thrill Of Victory grin.

Thanks Joe ! From time to time I still wear it.
.-)

Quote
The initial post by dean struck me as an unwelcome unrequested attempt to denigrate motorcycles

Me too. Hopefully I am wrong

Quote
Lars, you would have enjoyed our epic struggle this year.
I'm sure I would have. You have no idea how saddening it was NOT being there


Quote
As usual, I had to more than once remind Bill to clean up his act. :-D
Yeah..I know, he's so sloppy.
Ha, ha....I didn't mean that : he's my freaking hero !

Quote
We're looking forward to seeing you snatch another record when you come back. Keep in touch --

Cheers, Joe

Heeeeey Joe ! Will do . See ya' next year !
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 24, 2013, 05:23:19 PM
We will try again next year. That is Bonneville.

Yep !
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Vinsky on August 24, 2013, 05:38:34 PM
Here's a guy who still loves speed trials at an age lots of guys are hanging it up. John Renwick has been at it for over 50 years and has been an inspiration to many.  I will be running an old Vincent on the salt next year just to see what it will do and hopefully hold a record for a while.

http://vimeo.com/71698727
Title: Re: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: aut0m4tic on August 24, 2013, 06:06:06 PM
The "fact" is, that the record in the book for the f/bgs is the one I want.  Its a little "soft" so I want to run on it.  The reality is, that by the time I have a car together it will have been bumped to 400.  Big deal. Its a dream not a dollar! 

If Dean is just stirring the pot however, he gets the record for pushing the most peoples buttons in the shortest amount of time. :)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on August 24, 2013, 06:13:35 PM
Analysis:
fuel – faster than gas
blown – faster than unblown
partial streamlined – faster than unstreamlined
streamliner – faster than partial streamlined
bigger cc – faster than smaller cc
sidecar – well . . . sidecar. Numbers way out of proportion to the real world.
pushrod/vintage – because pushrod/vintage




A quick look through the records indicates that theory and reality are not the same no matter if it's a bike or car.

Some classes have had more development than others and some engines are better suited for this than others despite their size.

All said and done, the majority of us are trying to go faster year after year.

The horse is dead, Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 24, 2013, 06:30:46 PM
"NO similar 'cherry-picking' "facts" about
cars establishing open records are presented...mmmmm....why's that ?"

Because, if someone does the data, there are a whole lot less open car records.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: joea on August 24, 2013, 07:20:03 PM
octane..etal...data ARE FACTUAL points...DOES speak volumes ...opinions do as well...and they
are not the same....

opinions about the data...seems to be the rub...

Dean indeed made alot of good points....both in presenting factual data regarding classes
and records...ie "data points"...and in his analysis...

im leaving the interpretation of what is "good" to all of us to decide...



Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Kansas Bad Man on August 24, 2013, 07:53:01 PM
We came to Speedweek for what we thought would be a slam dunk. Running on a 25 year old 225 record. Vincent vs Busa. No problem, right? Wrong!! Same body we ran 235+, 40hp more, 30lbs more torque. Wet salt, other minor gremlins and no record :-(. I did have fun! We will try again next year. That is Bonneville.

Vincent against Busa.  If the Vincent and the Busa went through tech on the same day, Speedweek 2013, the two motorcycles wouldn't be in the same class.  Different classes make things fair.  You certainly wouldn't run a vintage push rod motorcycle, four speed, which is over sixty years old, against a modern day cammy, short stroke six speed.  I'm seventy five years old and been in motorcycle racing for some sixty years.  Ever since I can remember it's been the classes that made things fair and competitive.  For instance a 30 1/2 cu.in. Manx Norton overhead cam would run against a 45 cu.in. Indian Scout.  Less breathing, bigger inches made it competitive and fair.  For the Busa to run against a Vincent in a class at Bonneville doesn't seem fair.  One thing for sure, this isn't the only thing that puts a bee in my bonnet when it comes to classification.  Push rod length per stroke requirement, and more.  I don't know who dreams up some of this crap.

                                  Max
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 24, 2013, 08:14:23 PM
interpretation of what is "good"

Seems that "good" is NOT running on an open record.  For doing so will deem you a "cherry picker".  Which in turn will earn disrespect from your fellow racers and possibly lead to questions about your manliness and parents marriage status.

What strikes me as hilarious is the fact that at some point in time EVERY record was open.  So I can only conclude that the SCTA, FIM, FIA, AMA, ECTA etc. were founded by a bunch of cherry pickers.

So lets raise our glasses to Gaston de Chasseloup-Laubat, who on Dec. 18, 1898, became the first (and patron saint to all) cherry picker.  Here's to ol' Gassy.


Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: grumm441 on August 24, 2013, 08:20:52 PM
(edit . . . ) If you are a one and done, challenged an open record and won... then you are not a Bonneville racer... you are just one of the many visitors the flats get every year, you paid to go down the course.   You can brag on your record until someone else runs on it and takes it.  I do not say this to make your record less important, I say it because as most of us know, LSR is a lifestyle, that is what Bonneville racers do, we go back and race.

Nicely said, Stainless. I have been trying to find those words for years. You couldn't have defined it any better!

Nice sentiment, however did any one notice the Manxman teams A/BF 500 and A/BF 500 records from last year
they ran 188.730 and 203.373 on an 168 record. So they toured in, put 20 on the soft gas record and 35 on soft the fuel record.
And toured on home red hat in hand
Based on the logic of this thread, every bike over 500 should now have a 203.373 minimum

octane..etal...data ARE FACTUAL points...DOES speak volumes ...opinions do as well...and they
are not the same....

opinions about the data...seems to be the rub...

Dean indeed made alot of good points....both in presenting factual data regarding classes
and records...ie "data points"...and in his analysis...

im leaving the interpretation of what is "good" to all of us to decide...


That's nice, but we are only seeing half the data

"NO similar 'cherry-picking' "facts" about
cars establishing open records are presented...mmmmm....why's that ?"

Because, if someone does the data, there are a whole lot less open car records.

But until we see the car data, this is in fact, just speculation.

G
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 24, 2013, 08:23:25 PM
My speculation leads to at least over 280 open bike records in the 2013 Rule Book.  Better hurry, they're going fast!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: grumm441 on August 24, 2013, 08:33:44 PM
Still speculation just the same

Bikes have too few wheels for me to go fast on
I'm happy to look at them in tech an certify records, open or otherwise
But riding fast is for some one braver than me
I'll stick with the lakester thanks
G
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dean Los Angeles on August 24, 2013, 08:44:15 PM
Pot stirrer reporting for duty.

My son just had a baby - first grandchild. I thought it might be more important to hop on a plane then stick around here. :-D

Quote
Wobbly, you think that was difficult??? We upped the 100cc APS-BF with a 1967 Yamaha 3 speed trail bike motor
from 49mph set in 2008 to 91mph and out the back door at 99+.  Can't wait for someone to break that one.

Um . . . if Darrold Cummings managed 106 without the blower and on gas then . . .

The fastest 1000cc record is 251 in APS-BF. Makes Burt Munro's record of 183 in a fuel streamliner soft. Of course almost 50 years on the books.
On the other hand the 1000cc I-BGS record is 315. You have to look at the car records too to see who is making horsepower.

Quote
For the Busa to run against a Vincent in a class at Bonneville doesn't seem fair.
Fair? Is that what racing is about? Racing is about running faster than anyone else WITHOUT QUALIFICATION.

I realize the thrill of going to Bonneville is vastly improved if you go home with your name in the record books.
Ok, in your class you were competitive.
But you have to realize there are some real genius people running on far faster records.
I'll repeat what I said earlier. Every record set this year had a faster record on the books, in what should have been a slower class.
Not counting pushrod/vintage/side car that run in their own world.

I don't really care that you ran on an open record. You cherry picked it, didn't you?

Quote
Nice sentiment, however did any one notice the Manxman teams A/BF 500 and A/BF 500 records from last year
they ran 188.730 and 203.373 on an 168 record. So they toured in, put 20 on the soft gas record and 35 on soft the fuel record.
And toured on home red hat in hand
Based on the logic of this thread, every bike over 500 should now have a 203.373 minimum

UM . . . No, they ran on a 183 and 175 record in the APS class. And a very nice record it was. 203 on a 500 cc is damn competitive. And that's the point.

If you look at the record book Scott Guthrie holds an amazing number of records, and Oh Boy are they competitive. This year Team Guthrie Racing upped a blown 2000cc 170 record to 215. Sounds good until you look at the 252 unblown record.

The Costella name has some ungodly fast records attached to it. This year they stuck a wheel-on-a-stick to their 650 streamliner and ran 197 on an open record instead of running against the 230 streamliner record.

I have been running a spread sheet for ten years. My comparison is against the fastest overall records and how other records compare to see who is REALLY fast. No opinion necessary. Just numbers. Numbers like fuel is 6.0 mph faster than gas in the A class. 8.9 mph faster in the APS class. Partial streamlining is 25.2 mph faster in gas and 21.0 mph faster in fuel. Streamlining is faster than partial streamlining by 32.2 mph on gas and 34.3 mph on fuel. Yea numbers!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: grumm441 on August 24, 2013, 09:14:21 PM
Pot stirrer reporting for duty.

My son just had a baby - first grandchild. I thought it might be more important to hop on a plane then stick around here. :-D



Quote
Nice sentiment, however did any one notice the Manxman teams A/BF 500 and A/BF 500 records from last year
they ran 188.730 and 203.373 on an 168 record. So they toured in, put 20 on the soft gas record and 35 on soft the fuel record.
And toured on home red hat in hand
Based on the logic of this thread, every bike over 500 should now have a 203.373 minimum

UM . . . No, they ran on a 183 and 175 record in the APS class. And a very nice record it was. 203 on a 500 cc is damn competitive. And that's the point.



I should have took more time to look for my glasses and less time to be outraged
The Manx Guys were APS/BG and APS/BF

And congratulations on being a Granadad, some things are more important than LSR
G
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: 8pack on August 24, 2013, 10:56:10 PM
I don't consider myself a cherry-picker. I built the bike I always wanted to build a 2 engine turbocharged naked pushrod bike. It just so happens nobody else has the same desire. I did set a record while I was licensing up. I decided to do it that way so I could get the engines certified and have the rest of the time to go fast. Just so happened that my plan had a faul in it..... I hit a rut around 200mph (roughly 25mph over my record) and crashed :-o Will I be back? YES  Does the bike have more in it? YES  Would it be cool if somebody else was running against me? YES.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 24, 2013, 11:40:52 PM
I'd like to buy a vowel.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dakin Engineering on August 25, 2013, 12:36:11 AM
Dean,
Congrads on the grandbaby.
The rest of us are bustin' Acura to do it again.
(not the grandbaby)

Sorry if a few extra lines in the record book makes it too heavy.

Sam

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: SaltPeter on August 25, 2013, 04:34:14 AM
I can't see why any given Class has any performance based relationship to any other Class in Land Speed Racing.

Why does a Gas Record have to be slower than a Fuel Record they are totally separate Classes.

As for as I can tell any of us only compete within our chosen Class, it's not like Index Based Drag Racing Classes that race against each other.

Within a Class there maybe issues of Performance differences, this is a different issue.

Eventually most Classes will reach a peak Speed and the Record will be increased by smaller margins, until a Tech breakthrough occurs and the Record goes to a new level.

As an aside and I run a 250cc, there were two speeds recorded that I found in the results at Speedweek that has me scratching my head  :-o

3419B    250CC     M-BG       Scott Guthrie Racing    206.125    212.339    220.295    210.383    214.368    220.295
3414B    250CC     A-BG       Scott Guthrie Racing    187.965    192.682    194.979    191.003    192.247    194.979

Can anyone enlighten me :? what exactly these Bikes/Engines are?

Pete

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 25, 2013, 04:41:26 AM


I don't really care that you ran on an open record. You cherry picked it, didn't you?

No.




Try to make an effort and actually read what people here write.
You can start with my reply to you on page 4.

If you REALLY insist on degrading your fellow-racers with disparaging condescending judgements
concerning their motivation for racing, please do it on a qualified basis.
I could be wrong , but I am quite sure that I know better what goes on i my head
than you do.


This is so silly and downright nasty.
UNlike EVERYthing else I have experienced in this otherwise absolutely
fantastic community.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Buzz Lightbeer on August 25, 2013, 05:43:05 AM
So Dean Los Angeles. Why the shitty attitude to racers who go for open records? Are you just trying to antagonise for the sake of it? Maybe you should have some extra salt & vinegar to go with that big chip on yer shoulder.
Instead of keeping spreadsheets build something & race it, so you can be a cherry picker too then you won't feel left out.
At the end of the day people put a lot of effort & sacrifice into building both bikes & cars, so they can race on the salt regardless of records open or established.
Yes it would be nice to say that you have your name in the record books, but maybe it might just be a personal goal to achieve building & racing at Bonneville.   
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: 38flattie on August 25, 2013, 07:22:55 AM
Dean, congratulations on your first grandchild! They are WAY more important than LSR, or this thread! :cheers:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Jessechop on August 25, 2013, 08:32:22 AM



As an aside and I run a 250cc, there were two speeds recorded that I found in the results at Speedweek that has me scratching my head  :-o

3419B    250CC     M-BG       Scott Guthrie Racing    206.125    212.339    220.295    210.383    214.368    220.295
3414B    250CC     A-BG       Scott Guthrie Racing    187.965    192.682    194.979    191.003    192.247    194.979

Can anyone enlighten me :? what exactly these Bikes/Engines are?

Pete



Pretty sure thats wrong. 3419B set a APS-BF 2000 record at that speed, not M-BG 250

 http://www.scta-bni.org/Bonneville/SpeedWeek%202013/Aug_14/RecsAug14.html

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stainless1 on August 25, 2013, 09:42:22 AM
Hey guys, while Dean started the stir of the pot, we are all involved...
If anyone out there has not cherry picked a record... step up and declare your innocence
I think everyone getting into this actually looks at what they think is doable.  That is the definition of cherry picking... find the low hanging fruit and try to grab it.  It is not as easy as a lot of folks think it might be, it is not cheap no matter what you run and every record is the new "bar" that the next cherry picker will reach for.


that was 3 pages back... so far no one stepped up to declare innocence... that is because we are all cherry pickers.... human nature.  Don't consider it a bad thing... success or failure I HOPE TO CHERRY PICK A RECORD AT WOS... our 60 inch gas record is faster than the blown record... I can assure you from past experience it took several years and several records traded with the Rice Bros to make the HBL records faster than the unblown.  Yes the stats make it look like it should be easy peasy... racing is the part that makes it harder...

OK, all records when the class was opened were open.  Get over the cherry picker status, that is what you (and I and everybody else) did the first time...
Someone has to be first... no one will be last! 

Dean, nice stir, congrats on the new addition.... you have 16 -17 years to get something built for him/her to race, thought about which record you plan to cherry pick? 
 :cheers: y'all

see ya on the salt  8-)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: joea on August 25, 2013, 10:22:26 AM
 6 pages back..Dean posted "I give everybody credit for coming out and setting a record. It’s not the easiest thing to do, even on an open record."  I think many are not appreciating that.....

for example...i get asked all the time at work about..."I read about so and so she/he is a world/land speed  record holder"  etc...then they ask other questions, and find out more details........explaining open records...various classes...sidecars....new classes etc.....

it DOESNT diminish what they have done....it puts it in "PERSPECTIVE".....

kudos to ALL involved in LSR....strong common bond.....mad props to everyone....!

5 pages back I posted   "at the end of the day......your/our satisfaction with what occurred is its own measure of success...how its viewed by others may be another realm altogether...:)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Sumner on August 25, 2013, 12:52:51 PM
6 pages back..Dean posted "I give everybody credit for coming out and setting a record. It’s not the easiest thing to do, even on an open record."  I think many are not appreciating that.....

for example...i get asked all the time at work about..."I read about so and so she/he is a world/land speed  record holder"  etc...then they ask other questions, and find out more details........explaining open records...various classes...sidecars....new classes etc.....

it DOESNT diminish what they have done....it puts it in "PERSPECTIVE".....

kudos to ALL involved in LSR....strong common bond.....mad props to everyone....!

5 pages back I posted   "at the end of the day......your/our satisfaction with what occurred is its own measure of success...how its viewed by others may be another realm altogether...:)

Joe, great perspective on the whole deal  :cheers:.

Dean I was about to say something bad about you stirring the pot and then not staying in the pot, then the new grand-daddy thing emerged.  My bad for even thinking it even if I didn't post it  :oops: and congrats,

Sum
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Luckless on August 27, 2013, 02:33:58 AM
Ha Ha Ha  I Think I get it

There are these stupid people who make great personal and financial sacrifices to support your sport.  So you get to call them names and belittle their efforts. And your friends defend you and complement you on starting a lively conversation.

Ha Ha Ha  I get it now

Wait a minute, I don't think I get it after all..........I think I am just laughing along with the crowd..........But I Don't Feel Very Good About It 
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: bucketlist on August 27, 2013, 04:02:33 AM
I tried to stay out of this because I don't race there, and those who do should decide policy. But some of y'all are overlooking one very important point. Look around. All I see is pictures, but it appears the average age is way up there.

Look at what is happening in hotrodding. The major magazines were all doing their dead level best to kill the sport by belittling any effort to join in. Entry level was $50k or so or you were soundly insulted. Old geezers took a car to a pro shop where they threw most of it away and charged 6 figures to replace it all with kit car parts, and this was pushed as the only acceptable way to enter the sport. So young folks went to cheap Japanese cars and a whole new way of looking at individualization so they could be car nuts too. I berated Freiburger for continually putting out a completely irrelevant magazine for Old Geezers Who Don't Build Cars, asking him to turn the grand old name of Hot Rod Magazine over to someone that was actually interested in hotrodding. A few months later editorial policy took a complete turn in the opposite direction, toward something actually related to hotrodding. I quite possibly saved the sport. Other magazines are still trying to kill it.

Like it or not, and whether you choose to admit it or not, Bonneville will die a slow death if you don't somehow encourage young blood. Cronyism and old geezer cliques and barriers to entry are just fine and lots of fun for those of you with insecurities, but will kill Bonneville. Yes, the gall of some people, imagine actually wanting to come to our salt and race.

You need to run ads in all the auto magazines proudly pointing out all the open records and the wonderful opportunities for beginners to come on down and get a taste of LSR. That is what it will take to save Bonneville.

Or you can piss and moan about anyone that tries that, and watch young folks go race some other way, and young folks will race, while Bonneville becomes all about history and only about history.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 27, 2013, 06:12:28 AM
Great posts above.
Thanks !
I AM truly chocked about the original poster.
Not in a pearl-clutching hysterical way...more in a WTF-sad way.

As I've mentioned before ;
I have meet NOthing but the kindest , most helpful people .... on the Salt ... and on this forum.
I could be wrong ( well...not really ) , but I was under the impression that this forum was all about helping and
encouraging each other , not belittling or antagonize each other or
flaunting an attitude of superiority.

...



Dean: I'm addressing this to you personally. Please show the guts to answer me:



You started out with one he** of a sweeping judgement :


.....the records were bought. As soon as they paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.
...It’s called cherry picking....

I posted a reply ( that for some reason you haven't bothered answering ) :

...It’s because 29 of the records were bought. As soon as they paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.
..... It’s called cherry picking....

Really ?

I must admit that when I read it I went:

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/Dafuq.gif)

Da'fq ??? ( pardon my 'French' )


Here's a news-flash for you: nothing is black/white...there are all sorts of shades of grey.

I'm one of them who according to you 'bought' a record.
First of all ; when I started out I had no clue if there was a record in my class.
In fact I thought I was to run in another class until I was told that my bike
wasn't a 'P' ( push-rod ) but a 'V' (Vintage) because my good ole' Indian have
very short ( apparently NON-) push-rods.

I spend 1½-years of my spare-time and every available cent I made, building the bike...put it in a box..
air-freight it a billion miles across the Atlantic...with the truely invaluable help from the best people in the world
run it at Bonneville...fail miserably...freight it back....spend another year building..
..air-freight it over the big pond again...run it with some success...ESTABLISH a record

...and I 'bought' that ???

Care to check how I 'bought' that ?
Be my guest:

http://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php/topic,5849.0.html

Sorry if this makes me ever so tinybittyslightly...how can I put it?....'miffed'.


OK enough of this. Gotta get going updating my build-thread:

http://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php/topic,13079.0.html

BTW: I have NO clue if there is a record in the class that my new bike will run in.
That is not what this is about for me....yes: really !
You can applaud that, you can shake your head at that , you can choose not believe what I just said.
I don't give a flying f...f....front-fork.

It's the gawdhonest truth.

WHEN eventually I check to see if there IS a record, and if it turns out there ISN'T one,
I may have to change the name of the bike, and the thread, to:

'The Worlds Fastest Cherrypicker'

.....and of course be truly ashamed of myself.


Right





BTW: for EVERY SINGLE class ( and there's a WHOLE LOT of them) in which there is a record, there must at one point back,
have been a 'Cherrypicket' who established that.




Now here's a piece of good advise when posting on a forum;
don't post anything that you wouldn't say if you were seeing the person in real life,
eye-to-eye
.
So Dean, as were are a few thousand miles from each other, please have a look here,
so you can put a face / a human being, to the guy you're 'talking to' here.
This is me:

with bike:

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/2-31.jpg)

with SpeedWeek record
( Pointing to the paragraph printed in really really small letters saying
"..This record was bought, as soon as you paid the entry fee and ran on an open record,
and will be filed under 'Cherrypicking'
.." ). Silly me, I should have read that. )


(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/start3Deterofficieltrekordeneribogen.jpg)

doing a dance of sheer joy and happiness after establishing a record at BUB
 ( "..  bought. As soon as [ I ] paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.." )

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/LarsIndiandans-1.jpg)


Now tell me that you will say to me in real life ( as you did here ) the things you said.

Let's say; you walk up to me ( mentally ) on that last picture
..tap my shoulder
..say something to the effect of: ( just guessing...paraphrasing  )
"Stop that dancing around. Your records was bought. As soon as you paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.
You're a cherry picker
.."

Would you do that ?


.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: JR529 on August 27, 2013, 06:22:46 PM
Getting a certified record at Speedweek, Bub, WOS WF or any other event is not easy or cheap. Even if you were the first one to set the record. Everyone who makes it out alive with a completed cert form has my admiration.

If you don't like open records then you should love that they are being filled up.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: RichFox on August 27, 2013, 06:50:48 PM


If you don't like open records then you should love that they are being filled up.
[/quote]                 Now there is the truth. Should be the last word on this subject.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dr Goggles on August 27, 2013, 06:57:15 PM
I have to add my name to the long list of "buyers"...not just that but at the bottom of my post you'll see that the record I hold is twenty miles per hour SLOWER than the Bonneville record....

tasty cherry but. :roll:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Sumner on August 27, 2013, 07:56:04 PM
I have to add my name to the long list of "buyers"...not just that but at the bottom of my post you'll see that the record I hold is twenty miles per hour SLOWER than the Bonneville record....

tasty cherry but. :roll:

You know that air falls down to the lowest spot where it is thicker, so harder to penetrate.  I'm impressed with what you have accomplished "down there"  8-),

Sum
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 28, 2013, 03:24:14 AM
..and running upside-down, makes it even more of an accomplishment !
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 28, 2013, 10:36:51 AM
Octane,

Last night over several libations it was unanimously decided by Waldo the shop cat that the Northern Europe Cherry Pickers Association, Copenhagen Chapter sense forth referred to as NECPA be granted full honor and privileges.

Congratulations!

Remember the motto, “You can only pop that cherry once”.   :wink:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 28, 2013, 10:49:46 AM
Dr Goggles

Waldo the shop cat is working on the certification of the Down Under Cherry Pickers Association (DUCPA) Melbourne Chapter. However, every time I turn him over to look at the facts of your cherry picking ability he hacks up a hair ball. Maybe fewer libations will help. :| We will be back to you shortly.

Plm Krze
ECCPA (Wilmington Chapter)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 28, 2013, 12:33:33 PM
Octane,

Last night over several libations it was unanimously decided by Waldo the shop cat that the Northern Europe Cherry Pickers Association, Copenhagen Chapter sense forth referred to as NECPA be granted full honor and privileges.

Congratulations!

Remember the motto, “You can only pop that cherry once”.   :wink:


I bow my head and duff my cap to your cat Sir, for the honour.
Please go feed Waldo a mouse or whatever it is that cats eat.

I'm shopping today:
 http://www.niftylift.com/?node=51990
I think I'll go for the 'Self Propelled' model.
Then I can just sit around ... do absolutely nothing ... and presto: I've got a record.

.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: doug on August 28, 2013, 05:26:20 PM
Octane,

Last night over several libations it was unanimously decided by Waldo the shop cat that the Northern Europe Cherry Pickers Association, Copenhagen Chapter sense forth referred to as NECPA be granted full honor and privileges.

Congratulations!

Remember the motto, “You can only pop that cherry once”.   :wink:


I bow my head and duff my cap to your cat Sir, for the honour.
Please go feed Waldo a mouse or whatever it is that cats eat.

I'm shopping today:
 http://www.niftylift.com/?node=51990
I think I'll go for the 'Self Propelled' model.
Then I can just sit around ... do absolutely nothing ... and presto: I've got a record.

.


Why pick?:
http://www.jokeroo.com/videos/cool/cherry-picking-machine.html (http://www.jokeroo.com/videos/cool/cherry-picking-machine.html)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 28, 2013, 05:32:25 PM
Quote from: doug link=topic=13058.msg231251#msg231251 date=137772518

Why pick?:
[url=http://www.jokeroo.com/videos/cool/cherry-picking-machine.html
http://www.jokeroo.com/videos/cool/cherry-picking-machine.html[/url]

How 'bout that?   Dean's dream come true.  Cherry picked records falling from the trees!!!  Bonneville be damned!  I'm going there!!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 28, 2013, 08:46:57 PM
I saw a lot of sidecars in there.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 28, 2013, 11:33:05 PM
This upside down cherry pickn from down under has got the shop cat is a dizzy! Waldo did say meow for the pics of the professional grade pickn machenses. opps maybe a bit too much libation.  :roll:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 28, 2013, 11:46:30 PM
I saw a lot of sidecars in there.


I saw a couple of tasty looking ones falling from the tree.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 29, 2013, 03:48:44 AM


Now here's a piece of good advise when posting on a forum;
don't post anything that you wouldn't say if you were seeing the person in real life,
eye-to-eye
.
So Dean, as were are a few thousand miles from each other, please have a look here,
so you can put a face / a human being, to the guy you're 'talking to' here.
This is me:

with bike:

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/2-31.jpg)

with SpeedWeek record
( Pointing to the paragraph printed in really really small letters saying
"..This record was bought, as soon as you paid the entry fee and ran on an open record,
and will be filed under 'Cherrypicking'
.." ). Silly me, I should have read that. )


(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/start3Deterofficieltrekordeneribogen.jpg)

doing a dance of sheer joy and happiness after establishing a record at BUB
 ( "..  bought. As soon as [ I ] paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.." )

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/LarsIndiandans-1.jpg)


Now tell me that you will say to me in real life ( as you did here ) the things you said.

Let's say; you walk up to me ( mentally ) on that last picture
..tap my shoulder
..say something to the effect of: ( just guessing...paraphrasing  )
"Stop that dancing around. Your records was bought. As soon as you paid the entry fee and ran on an open record.
You're a cherry picker
.."

Would you do that ?


.

Hey Dean !... please come along and answer my post, will ya' ?!
Look at me at the last pic. I can't bloody hold that silly position for much longer....getting cramps, man

.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 29, 2013, 08:23:36 AM
Octane,

Last night over several libations it was unanimously decided by Waldo the shop cat that
the Northern Europe Cherry Pickers Association, Copenhagen Chapter
 sense forth referred to as NECPA be granted full honor and privileges.

The wait is over !

The ultimate fashion- and support statement is here.

Now your family and friends can show their support.
You can impress the girls ....and you can .....er.....un-impress Dean.


THE CHERRY PICKER NECPA SUPPORT T-SHIRT.

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/2-32.jpg)


Notice that it comes with the hip-to-wear-a-pack-of-fags roll-up sleeves

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/1-Kopi-2.jpg)

Naturally you can order it with your particular chapter print.

Wear it with pride:

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/1-32.jpg)



Soon to be available from CherryPower productions.
All proceedings will go to me personally, as not only am I too lazy to actually work
for a record, I'm also too cheap to pay for the record I will buy next year.


.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Jodar on August 29, 2013, 09:49:59 AM
Lars, you have no idea how many bellylarfs your pictures generated here.

The sillyass shot of you dancing confirms rumors that you were in fact a disco duck who went on to a long and productive career perfecting the Macarena.

Your cherrypicker shirts strike a rather sensitive note here, as we are shamefully going after another open record next year - unless of course we can buy it ahead of time. True story.

In the spirit of kicking a sleeping dog, we would all be interested to hear of Dean's efforts to cherry-pick an open bike record a few years back. He probably would have been better off to just buy it outright :-o

Cheers, Joe



Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: makr on August 29, 2013, 11:23:40 AM
I tried to stay out of this because I don't race there, and those who do should decide policy. But some of y'all are overlooking one very important point. Look around. All I see is pictures, but it appears the average age is way up there.

Look at what is happening in hotrodding. The major magazines were all doing their dead level best to kill the sport by belittling any effort to join in. Entry level was $50k or so or you were soundly insulted. Old geezers took a car to a pro shop where they threw most of it away and charged 6 figures to replace it all with kit car parts, and this was pushed as the only acceptable way to enter the sport. So young folks went to cheap Japanese cars and a whole new way of looking at individualization so they could be car nuts too. I berated Freiburger for continually putting out a completely irrelevant magazine for Old Geezers Who Don't Build Cars, asking him to turn the grand old name of Hot Rod Magazine over to someone that was actually interested in hotrodding. A few months later editorial policy took a complete turn in the opposite direction, toward something actually related to hotrodding. I quite possibly saved the sport. Other magazines are still trying to kill it.

Like it or not, and whether you choose to admit it or not, Bonneville will die a slow death if you don't somehow encourage young blood. Cronyism and old geezer cliques and barriers to entry are just fine and lots of fun for those of you with insecurities, but will kill Bonneville. Yes, the gall of some people, imagine actually wanting to come to our salt and race.

You need to run ads in all the auto magazines proudly pointing out all the open records and the wonderful opportunities for beginners to come on down and get a taste of LSR. That is what it will take to save Bonneville.

Or you can Plymouth and moan about anyone that tries that, and watch young folks go race some other way, and young folks will race, while Bonneville becomes all about history and only about history.


Well said!!!!

This post should be on the welcome page.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 29, 2013, 02:27:41 PM
IT IS OFFICIAL!!!!!

The Down Under Cherry Pickers Association (DUCPA) Melbourne Chapter has been approved!! :cheers:

We now have the following "offical" chapters certified by the one the only, Waldo Pepper feline extraordinary. This is quite an accomplishment and we all should all be proud. It is not easy to hold a cat upside down for any length of time.

Down Under Cherry Pickers Association (DUCPA) Melbourne Chapter (pronounced Duck Pa)
Northern Europe Cherry Pickers Association (NECPA) Copenhagen Chapter (pronounced Neck Pa)
East Coast Cherry Pickers Association (ECCPA) Wilmington Chapter (pronounced ECK Pa)


Always remain faithful to our motto:  You can only pop that cherry once!
 
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 29, 2013, 03:17:21 PM
as we are shamefully going after another open record next year


Shamefully Joe?   We're going to buy that record with our heads held high!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: wobblywalrus on August 29, 2013, 04:06:00 PM
It is the beginning of the off season when speed week ends.  it is not unknown for one of our esteemed veterans to make up some goofball thread like this.  Look at years past.  We always rise for the bait.  Especially us bike folks.  Its all part of the fun and nothing to get wound up about.   
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 29, 2013, 04:37:48 PM
Not get wound up??  NOT GET WOUND UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????  WADDIA MEAN NOT GET WOUND UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: octane on August 29, 2013, 05:32:18 PM
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeasy now Bill...calm down...mmmm, what can I do to wind you down..
...let me see.. AHH , now I know:
Come with me right this way...come sit on a REAL bike for a change:

(http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/bb220/octane98extra/IMG_2285.jpg)

See ?! That's much better...you smiling and all

.-)


In the spirit of kicking a sleeping dog, we would all be interested to hear of Dean's efforts to cherry-pick an open bike record a few years back.

That's just absolutely brilliant ; another member.
Dean. I need your size, and your address.
A free T-shirt is coming your way.

.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 29, 2013, 05:59:36 PM
Hold on there!!!

Dean lives on the Left Coast.  Waldo has told me that there has been no application for a chapter west of Wilmington.

Sooo, without a chapter NO T-shirt!!

You have to earn your spurs in this club damn it!!!

No buying your way in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  AND THAT IS THAT!!

You have to profess your love of cherry's and then go pop one! 8-)

I am surprised at you Octane :-o, you of all people know how hard we try to keep this club exclusive!!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dakin Engineering on August 29, 2013, 06:51:41 PM
I'd like to charter the Heart of America Cherry Pickers Assn.
Or HoACPA.
Ya gotta do something with the stones.... :-D

Pickin cherries since 2001,
Sam
#6062
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dean Los Angeles on August 29, 2013, 07:22:43 PM
Quote
Hey Dean !... please come along and answer my post, will ya' ?!
Look at me at the last pic. I can't bloody hold that silly position for much longer....getting cramps, man

Sorry for the long delay. Lengthy hospital stay to get the stitches out of my side. As in laughing so hard I'm in stitches.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Dynoroom on August 29, 2013, 07:32:15 PM
Dean,

Do I hear the sound of a fishing reel letting out line at high speed.......  :cheers:
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: generatorshovel on August 29, 2013, 08:31:50 PM
Wow Lars,
Permission request is in the post
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t24/generatorshovel/OtbackOz_zps8d3bf5db.jpg) (http://s156.photobucket.com/user/generatorshovel/media/OtbackOz_zps8d3bf5db.jpg.html)
What will the NECPA do once all the cherries have been picked ?
Tiny
PS, I guess the cat is outa the bag now, here's some test footage of some testing
http://vimeo.com/user14175033/superchargedhondamonkey
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on August 29, 2013, 10:41:35 PM
For those who race sidecar I am proposing we band together and form the SCTA.  The Sidecar Cherry Thieving Assoc.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 30, 2013, 04:27:14 AM
I have just returned home from BUB 2013 where I tried to cherry pick and buy an open record. Let's total the price of this purchase:

Used motorcycle purchased for the class record - $2200
Parts and supplies to make it legal for the class - $1500
Entry Fee for BUB (Two riders)                         - $1050
Gas, food, Lodging                                            - $2000+
Seven Days leave from work                              ??
100's of hours of my labor                                  Priceless

We got the record speed. But on teardown for inspection, the inspector declared the bike ineligible for the record because it had 1 mm too much wear and therefore was not a stock bore size anymore. A 30 year old bike with a worn bore. Imagine that...

So no record even after paying huge and unnecessary expenses. Wait? Wasn't I supposed to get the record after I paid for it? I want my money back.

Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Plmkrze on August 30, 2013, 08:21:48 AM
I'd like to charter the Heart of America Cherry Pickers Assn.
Or HoACPA.
Ya gotta do something with the stones.... :-D

Pickin cherries since 2001,
Sam
#6062

Your application has been forwarded to Waldo the shop cat for consideration. From all of the other CPA chapters we wish you good luck!

HACKK PA has a nice ring to it!

Remember "You can only pop that cherry once"!
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on August 30, 2013, 09:14:24 AM
I have just returned home from BUB 2013 where I tried to cherry pick and buy an open record. Let's total the price of this purchase:

Used motorcycle purchased for the class record - $2200
Parts and supplies to make it legal for the class - $1500
Entry Fee for BUB (Two riders)                         - $1050
Gas, food, Lodging                                            - $2000+
Seven Days leave from work                              ??
100's of hours of my labor                                  Priceless

We got the record speed. But on teardown for inspection, the inspector declared the bike ineligible for the record because it had 1 mm too much wear and therefore was not a stock bore size anymore. A 30 year old bike with a worn bore. Imagine that...

So no record even after paying huge and unnecessary expenses. Wait? Wasn't I supposed to get the record after I paid for it? I want my money back.

Don

Don, we had a similar experience with our bike but ended up under the limit. (it had a .10 overbore)

Results = cherries rendered.  :cheers:

What bike are you running?

 Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 30, 2013, 10:48:02 AM
My cherry-picked class was 750-P-PB. Only one bike was made that I know of fits the class. Mine was a 1984 Kawasaki GPZ ZX750 E1. Stock bore according to the manual is 66 mm but the inspector said his micrometer measured about 67 mm. Disqualified. No record. Just fond memories of all the effort and money gone.

And now I get to try and put the bike back together. That's not easy or cheap either.

Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: charlie101 on August 30, 2013, 11:46:21 AM
I think Outback Oz rather would be named Outback Australia Cherry Pickers Assoc. OBACPA :-D ...we'll find new ways to pick'em...
Wow Lars,
Permission request is in the post
(http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t24/generatorshovel/OtbackOz_zps8d3bf5db.jpg) (http://s156.photobucket.com/user/generatorshovel/media/OtbackOz_zps8d3bf5db.jpg.html)
What will the NECPA do once all the cherries have been picked ?
Tiny
PS, I guess the cat is outa the bag now, here's some test footage of some testing
http://vimeo.com/user14175033/superchargedhondamonkey
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: High Gear on August 30, 2013, 11:56:42 AM
Don, was your bike production engine, production frame, blown? if so I get it. But elsware in this thread shows Scott Guthrie had a Honda entered in p-ppb 750. I think that's production engine, production frame, pushrod, blown. I did not know Honda made such a beast?

I own a Honda CX650T which i believe would run in p-ppb 650?  Am I wrong?

Gary
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Vinsky on August 30, 2013, 12:35:02 PM
Gary,
Just google  "1984 Kawasaki GPZ ZX750 E1"
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: JimL on August 30, 2013, 12:51:25 PM

Gary, your 650 is actually a 674cc and must run 750 class for "production".  Some of my M and A class CX engines are destroked to get down into 650 class.  That is not allowed for Production class.

JimL
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 30, 2013, 01:17:20 PM
The Honda CX Turbo bikes must run in the pushrod class (P-PPB). The Kawasaki ZX 750 E1 is an overhead cam engine. So its class is P-PB.
It is still an open class since my bike was disqualified for being worn past stock bore. If anyone wants to cherry pick the class be my guest, but you better measure your bore first.

Good luck
Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: hotrod on August 30, 2013, 04:17:43 PM
Can that engine be sleeved to get back in spec?
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: SabreTooth on August 30, 2013, 05:06:33 PM
Stock bore according to the manual is 66 mm but the inspector said his micrometer measured about 67 mm. Disqualified. No record.

Not knowing the BUB rule book (at the moment, I'm focused on SCTA rules, with no rulebook at hand, yeah, I know, get 20 copies and place them everywhere including the throne room :-D), I'm a little worried by the "about" bit. This is precision stuff, there is no "about" anything when it comes to precision engineering and measuring for records. "About" 1 mm is "about" exactly 39.4 thou on the diameter (bore) or 19.7 thou on the radius or "wear." Also, were measurements taken at multiple points around and along the bore?

Admittedly, 40 thou over is starting to look more like my oil burning, excessive blow-by, Landcruiser "tractor" engine regarding tolerances and wear. What are the BUB limits for overbore for your production class?

Are the inspectors required to use NIST traceable calibrated measuring equipment?

I'm now curious.

Jim
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on August 30, 2013, 07:30:18 PM
I'm not curious after reading Jim L's reliable reply.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: donpearsall on August 30, 2013, 08:16:06 PM
The AMA rules for production engines are that no over-bore is allowed. The stock bore is required regardless of wear. I have no idea of what the tolerance is for measuring error or rounding.  For engines older than 35 years, the Production Classic does allow +- .050 tolerance . My bike is 29 years old so does not fit there.

Don
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: edinlr on August 30, 2013, 10:42:54 PM
Don, that is funny (as in interesting) about your bike, as the 750 Kawasaki holds the record in the SCTA in 750 P-PB.  I am guessing a previous owner may have put some pistons in your bike, because a pure stock version should have been 66mm or 738cc, at least when it was cool.  The other turbo bikes that run in 750 are the Yamaha and Suzuki, which are labeled as 650s, but are in the 655 to 673 range.  You shouldn't have to sleeve the cylinder to get it legal, I'm sure there are plenty of stock cylinders around, but you might have to buy custom pistons as stockers may be hard to find.  I have one of the Kawasaki 750 turbos too, but I will check the bore before I bring it out there to race.

Too bad about not being able to buy a record, I tried too.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Beng on March 10, 2014, 03:47:28 PM
I can't see why any given Class has any performance based relationship to any other Class in Land Speed Racing.
Why does a Gas Record have to be slower than a Fuel Record they are totally separate Classes.

  Most people missed the point of this thread for one reason or another.
 
   SaltPeter, A fuel record does not have to be faster than a gas record, nor does a blown record have to be faster than a normally aspirated record, nor does someone running a four-valve per-cylinder engine have to run faster than a two-valve engine, but you have to admit it looks good if they do doesn't it?
 
    Everyone that races "buys" their trophies and records because racing costs money, but the starter of the thread was not saying anything negative about people spending money to race and have fun. What he was saying is this:
 
     You have the choice to run in an old class that takes a LOT of smarts, skill and experience to set a record in, or you have the choice to run in a class that takes a lot less of those things, and those who do set a record in a very competitive and old class that has had a lot of smart men trying to grab it for many years have a right to crow a LOT louder than someone who sets a record in a class that does not have such a history.
 
       So if two guys are running BSA Goldstars for instance, if the one running ordinary gasoline is an expert tuner who can make it run faster than someone running alcohol or a blower, then YES he has bragging rights.
 
        Likewise if two guys are running Goldstars and the only way the one guy can win the record is to ditch his Goldie engine and to buy a newer design engine with more valves per cylinder, then maybe he will set the record, but he has not really beat the guy that had the faster Goldie engine.
 
         So the thread is simply giving credit to those who set records because of their engine tuning expertise as opposed to those who set records by finding gaps in the rules or record books, and I think those guys do have extra bragging rights don't they?
 
           
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on March 10, 2014, 05:12:20 PM
    You have the choice to run in an old class that takes a LOT of smarts, skill and experience to set a record in, or you have the choice to run in a class that takes a lot less of those things,        

You are making the assumption that those who run on an open or soft record are not smart enough or too lazy to bother working hard to break a record.  

I'm putting a blower on the sidecar this year.  The class record is open right now.  Where's the challenge?  First of all you have to make two passes to set the record.  Anything can happen.  Nothing is guaranteed.  Secondly there is the challenge of seeing just how far up you can set that record.  There is no rule that says you have to run slow on an open record.  Nor is there a rule that says if you're smart or skillful or have a lot of experience you are not allowed to run on an open record.

P.S.  Anyone know where I can pick up a Snell 05 or better paper bag so no one will know its me running on an open record?

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Speed Limit 1000 on March 10, 2014, 09:21:04 PM
I know what you are saying. When we first ran our lakester with a 750 Honda we set the J/FL record at 133MPH. A few years later with a Kawasaki 750R we set it at 204MPH. Someone has to set a record in an open class so you can have a goal to go after :-D
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on March 11, 2014, 12:29:55 AM
Beng,
 What I read in the opening post of this thread (page 1) was Dean giving his opinion on why there were more records set by motorcycles than cars at Speedweek 2013.

At least that was what was said at the top of his post. (It did seem to take a bit of a turn)   :roll:

My opinion (for what it's worth) is that the poor salt conditions seems to have affected the lower powered motorcycles less than some of the other vehicles. (traction maybe)

I do hear what Dean was saying about the speeds between the different classes not always being what you would think they should be.
( the record book is full of examples in both the 2 and 4 wheel categories.)

The main issue that I see is not "the extra bragging rights" to some but the belittling of others.

 Don

 Oh and welcome to the Landracing Forum
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: mtkawboy on March 11, 2014, 04:24:31 PM
Id sure think that a 66m bore engine would have a serious smoking and blowby problem when measured at 67mm with an extra .039.4 thousandths clearance. But that's just me.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: grumm441 on March 11, 2014, 05:06:46 PM
I was just looking at the results for the DLRA's speedweek in Australia
Stuart Hooper riding a 1959 Velocette Venom in APS/PBF 650 ran 183.374 mph
I wonder what that cost?
G
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: JimL on March 11, 2014, 10:51:36 PM
From what I have seen on the internet, it looks like it cost a lot of work and dedication, mostly.

Outstanding result. :cheers:

Pushrod classes are really getting interesting.
JimL
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Vinsky on March 11, 2014, 11:31:04 PM
Bill Hoddinott recently interviewed Stuart Hooper in BRN. He tells all about the build. His website is:
http://www.worldsfastestvelocette.com/
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Sumner on March 12, 2014, 10:35:17 AM
Bill Hoddinott recently interviewed Stuart Hooper in BRN. He tells all about the build. His website is:
http://www.worldsfastestvelocette.com/

If I remember it was a 2 part story and a great one.  The modern day Burt Monro.  I can't wait for the movie.

Once again I'd like to stress that anyone that is serious about land speed racing, either car or bike, will cut their learning curve way down by subscribing to Bonneville Racing News and reading those articles by Bill.  If you are starting now buy the reprints of the articles.  The info in them will save you thousands of dollars and years of getting up to speed.

Scottie are you listening  :-D.  For your build some of those articles like the one on Stuart are 'must reads',

Sum
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: sockjohn on March 12, 2014, 10:49:53 PM
    You have the choice to run in an old class that takes a LOT of smarts, skill and experience to set a record in, or you have the choice to run in a class that takes a lot less of those things,        

You are making the assumption that those who run on an open or soft record are not smart enough or too lazy to bother working hard to break a record.  

I'm putting a blower on the sidecar this year.  The class record is open right now.  Where's the challenge?  First of all you have to make two passes to set the record.  Anything can happen.  Nothing is guaranteed.  Secondly there is the challenge of seeing just how far up you can set that record.  There is no rule that says you have to run slow on an open record.  Nor is there a rule that says if you're smart or skillful or have a lot of experience you are not allowed to run on an open record.

P.S.  Anyone know where I can pick up a Snell 05 or better paper bag so no one will know its me running on an open record?



A few years back there was a guy who ran on an open motorcycle record and did not set a record.  My fuzzy memory is something like made first pass on the bike, went and tinkered with the bike instead of going to impound because the run wasn't good enough for his liking.  Makes decent pass, goes to impound, then turns out on the return run and could not get the bike back for any more runs that meet.

I think he was luckier than many, how many people plan trips to the salt only to get rained out instead of making passes?
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Beng on March 13, 2014, 10:52:13 AM
What I read in the opening post of this thread (page 1) was Dean giving his opinion on why there were more records set by motorcycles than cars at Speedweek 2013.

   Yes, since the title of the thread is "Motorcycle "Records" - Really??", Dean putting the word "records" in quotes does imply that he is trying to make a point about the records set by motorcycles. On page 6 he comes back and defines his point more exactly by saying:
 
    "I'll repeat what I said earlier. Every record set this year had a faster record on the books, in what should have been a slower class.
I don't really care that you ran on an open record. You cherry picked it, didn't you?"
 
     Then he goes on to talk about someone putting "a wheel on a stick" onto a motorcycle and running in a soft class instead of a more competitive one.
 
      I think Dean and everyone else knows that it cost a lot of money and time to compete in motorsports at all, and he never brought that up so it does not make any sense to dwell on that point as some have in this thread.
      It seemed to me that the people responding to the thread turned the subject towards things they felt bad about which had nothing to do with what Dean was talking about.
 
       Dean never said there was anyone who could participate in motorsports with no effort or expenditure of money, he said that according to the data, it is a developing trend for motorcycle competitors to look for soft or empty records to attack rather than risk trying to break a hard record.

       Why point that out? Dean did not spell it out, but the most obvious reason is that maybe he has more respect for people that compete in tough classes than in soft ones. And all I was doing was agreeing with him because I have a lot of respect for someone who can build an engine and a machine that is capable of beating a hard class.
 
      It is a pretty simple and common sense statement, and I don't think he deserves the criticism some have heaped on him for voicing it.
   
       
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on March 13, 2014, 07:16:58 PM
"Then he goes on to talk about someone putting "a wheel on a stick" onto a motorcycle and running a soft class instead of a ore competitive one."   Shame either you or Dean know anything about sidecars.  If you did you would realize that (a) the majority of sidecars are, like most other classes including cars, purpose built and (b) the rules require more than a "wheel on a stick".  Question time.  What makes sidecar records soft? 

In his post he mentions sidecar streamliner 8081B running 197+ on an open record.  Adding the remark that had it run without a sidecar it would have been running on a 230 record.  A case of a "wheel on a stick" and run on a soft record?  Or is it the fact that 8081B CANNOT run as a solo as it doesn't meet the solo rule requirements.  Something conveniently forgotten perhaps?

So the conclusion would be that sidecar streamliner 8081B took the 650cc streamliner sidecar class record from open to 197+ but as it was an open and therefore soft record he deserves less respect.  Total and utter BS.

Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: dw230 on March 14, 2014, 01:56:41 PM
97 MPH would have been a soft record, 197 not so much

Unfortunately, many people do not have the facts nor know the players before commenting.

DW
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: grumm441 on March 14, 2014, 09:23:44 PM


In his post he mentions sidecar streamliner 8081B running 197+ on an open record.  Adding the remark that had it run without a sidecar it would have been running on a 230 record.  A case of a "wheel on a stick" and run on a soft record?  Or is it the fact that 8081B CANNOT run as a solo as it doesn't meet the solo rule requirements.  Something conveniently forgotten perhaps?

So the conclusion would be that sidecar streamliner 8081B took the 650cc streamliner sidecar class record from open to 197+ but as it was an open and therefore soft record he deserves less respect.  Total and utter BS.



Speculation was that he put a "wheel on a stick" on it because the rules were changed (25° rule)to stop that particular vehicle running
as a motorcycle streamliner.
Doesn't seem like cherry picking to me. seems like something else all together
G
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on March 14, 2014, 11:45:37 PM
I would like to change the term "cherry picking" to "cherry popping", it just doesn't sound so derogatory.   :roll:

  Don 
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on March 15, 2014, 12:15:04 PM
Messier, though.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on March 15, 2014, 02:33:42 PM
Perhaps, Stan, we should form a national organization.  Call it the National Association for the Appreciation of Cherry Pickers?
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stan Back on March 15, 2014, 04:31:48 PM
I think that one's been taken.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: runt13 on March 21, 2014, 07:40:41 AM
Well then, I picked the whole dam cherry tree.

Started prepping my sons Buell when ECTA was still running Maxton. To go after the P/PP-1350-4 record. Took me close to 3 years and, by the time I was ready, Maxton was no longer. Enter Wilmington.

I made the inaugural event, as well as 200 others, every ones 125mph rookie run was essentially a record. since they were all open. However the talk was always based on the Maxton records, either I just broke the Maxton record, or I still haven't broke the Maxton record, or ill be back to break the Maxton record, or what's the Maxton record.

I set the Wilmington record that day for my class, well below the Maxton record, [like 30mph slower].It was one of the proudest moments of my life. 3 years, 1200 miles, the bike, the gear, slept in a tent, raced out of the back of my truck, lived off corn chips and water. I wouldn't trade it for anything!

Been back over and over again, now have set and reset records, my own and others, in both the production and modified class's, and I'm still 10mph from the Maxton record for my initial class, but I am gaining on it. And that Maxton record is still my goal! Because to me the only way to make it a Wilmington record is to beat it!

It's a journey, a quest, a drive, a desire! I've met many a good person, been helped by all in one way or the other. And can say [from real world experience] its the best racing community in the world!

So, I promise I'll put the cherry tree back once I break the Maxton record. At Wilmington!
Title: Re:
Post by: Hellcat Customs on March 23, 2014, 03:38:50 PM
As the owner of a "soft" "wheel on a stick " record I'd like to toss in my thoughts...

Who can say a record is soft? Until you do exactly what another racer is attempting you really have no idea what it really takes to get there that way...

Is my personal record soft? Dunno, my bike on the street can do my record recorded speed in 3rd gear... But that's only momentary. What a bike can hit top speed wise on a freeway momentarily is completely different for a mile duration on wet salt.

From my own personal experience... Math says with the power to weight ratio and gearing I ran my bike should go much faster... But at Bonneville it won't... So are the records determined to be soft based purely on math? Because math sometimes fails us. Ask any engineer why his perfect design and figures still yield a product that fails... Because sometimes in the real world things don't work like they do on paper. There are many variables that go into the records set by the incredible people who have made it happen. Dyno numbers, math, and speculation can give you a guess of what you may achieve.... But.... The great white Dyno and that magic race way doesn't care about speculation or math or Dyno numbers... It tosses variables at you like surface changes, density, temps etc that alter what you Dyno sheet says.

Long and short, the only Man that has a right to say a record is soft is the One who breaks the record in question with the same variables... If you run in the same class to break that soft record and you have to spend 5k to do it, of course you can break it because you tossed money at it till you could overtake it... But your record breaker wasn't the same as the bike that set the soft record. You changed the variables. Now if you mimicked a vehicle, same cost, same basic build and you break that soft record then you pushed harder and you have the right you say it was soft cause you did more work with the same tools.

Basically, respect all the records no matter how fast... Someone earned it with hard work. There is no soft record, only records that someday will be overtaken.

You racers who have records, you're inspirations. Thank you fir your hard work to show what could be done...
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: salt27 on March 23, 2014, 04:59:47 PM
As the owner of a "soft" "wheel on a stick " record I'd like to toss in my thoughts...

Who can say a record is soft? Until you do exactly what another racer is attempting you really have no idea what it really takes to get there that way...

Is my personal record soft? Dunno, my bike on the street can do my record recorded speed in 3rd gear... But that's only momentary. What a bike can hit top speed wise on a freeway momentarily is completely different for a mile duration on wet salt.

From my own personal experience... Math says with the power to weight ratio and gearing I ran my bike should go much faster... But at Bonneville it won't... So are the records determined to be soft based purely on math? Because math sometimes fails us. Ask any engineer why his perfect design and figures still yield a product that fails... Because sometimes in the real world things don't work like they do on paper. There are many variables that go into the records set by the incredible people who have made it happen. Dyno numbers, math, and speculation can give you a guess of what you may achieve.... But.... The great white Dyno and that magic race way doesn't care about speculation or math or Dyno numbers... It tosses variables at you like surface changes, density, temps etc that alter what you Dyno sheet says.

Long and short, the only Man that has a right to say a record is soft is the One who breaks the record in question with the same variables... If you run in the same class to break that soft record and you have to spend 5k to do it, of course you can break it because you tossed money at it till you could overtake it... But your record breaker wasn't the same as the bike that set the soft record. You changed the variables. Now if you mimicked a vehicle, same cost, same basic build and you break that soft record then you pushed harder and you have the right you say it was soft cause you did more work with the same tools.

Basically, respect all the records no matter how fast... Someone earned it with hard work. There is no soft record, only records that someday will be overtaken.

You racers who have records, you're inspirations. Thank you fir your hard work to show what could be done...

Well said.   :cheers:
Title: Re:
Post by: Stainless1 on March 24, 2014, 07:19:29 PM

Long and short, the only Man that has a right to say a record is soft is the One who breaks the record in question with the same variables... If you run in the same class to break that soft record and you have to spend 5k to do it, of course you can break it because you tossed money at it till you could overtake it... But your record breaker wasn't the same as the bike that set the soft record. You changed the variables. Now if you mimicked a vehicle, same cost, same basic build and you break that soft record then you pushed harder and you have the right you say it was soft cause you did more work with the same tools.

Sorry, I must disagree... your are running a class, the bike you pick is your choice.  Why would I want to run the same setup and see if I can go faster...  If you set a record you are happy with, then that is your record... If I think I can break it, I will decide how I will do that and if I do, it will be my record,  that will not necessarily give me the right to say yours was soft... unless I blow it away.  :-o And even then, an old record is always subject to change in rules or technology. 

Basically, respect all the records no matter how fast... Someone earned it with hard work. There is no soft record, only records that someday will be overtaken.


Anyone that has been on here for any time has read this from me... There are no unbeatable records, every record can be bested and probably will be. 

If you are happy with a record you set, leave it alone... if someone thinks they can take it, encourage them to try. If they do,  take it back... you know if you have a soft record don't be surprised if someone calls it soft... 
Many of us have soft records, but circumstances often control the final speeds....  :cheers:
Title: Re:
Post by: Hellcat Customs on March 24, 2014, 07:55:30 PM
All you say yes is true... But none of it answers my actual question...

Let me rephrase the question missed in my long winded post...

What gives anyone the right to call a record soft? What right does anyone except the record racer him or herself to say it's weak... If you weren't there with that budget or that rig with a helmet on then aren't you speculating that it's easy or a soft record.

Personally because I know what I went thru as a first year rookie, there is no easy record. Mine was an open class...I ran it because people said turbos blow up Harleys and street ridden hacks are slow... The blue piece of paper wasn't what I was out for. I went to prove a turbo Harley can survive Bonneville and that a real street sidecar rig could actually do better than freeway speed and could hold that speed. I was glad to establish a record in the open class, then I played with my computer and ran a bit faster to bump it.... The things I learned about the reality of this type of Racing amazed me... Like seeing bikes with half the power as another run much much faster... That what I thought I knew about Racing doesn't apply to Bonneville at all. Conventional race setups don't work like they should out there. Most of all I learn to respect every man or woman who races there. Record or not. Soft record or 300mph record its all the same. the folks who hold any record poured their souls into it and probably a great deal of money to... So to call a racers record soft and talk down on it at all is insulting and honestly poorly honors the greats who have raced there through out history. Anyone involved should honor our forefathers of speed and respect and support all the racers out there... Doesn't matter if they get a record ever, bottom line is they are trying. Slow record fast record doesn't matter either, it's the recognition that someone put in the effort and could do it more than once...

There is no soft record, just a beginning point to grow a class.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: joea on March 24, 2014, 09:01:11 PM
"soft" like any other adjective is a matter of perspective.......

i have a few records at Bonneville....and i can look everyone in the eye...with
all the honesty of my being...and say "THOSE RECORDS ARE SOFT"...!!!!!!!!!!!!!

....honeymoon there...wife induced 7 days before
SW so baby momma and daddy on time for tech inspection (and it was "time").....blood sweat and tears for over 22 yrs.....

bla bla bla....the records are SOFT.....!!!!!!!!!!

do I respect nearly anyone who has even tried to set a record...darn straight I do....

effort gets respected.....kudos....to all who try...

BUT some records and achievments are ALOT more respected than others.....

some records are "STOUT".....some are "STIFF"..... etc......its alot about perspective....

 at the end of the day......your/our satisfaction with what occurred is its own measure of success...how its viewed by others may be another realm altogether...:)

Joe Amo



Title: Re:
Post by: Hellcat Customs on March 24, 2014, 10:43:33 PM
Joe you are a perfect example... You set records you consider soft... as the Guy in the trenches and knowing what you struggled against to do it, you have the right to say Soft... By you considering them that way it makes me think you feel with a bit more work and trial and error you could go faster. I hope to see it! I love seeing people and machines grow! As an on looker though, I can't say honestly your records are soft, I never went Head to head with that record... So because I don't know what exactly it takes to do what you do And how you do...I honestly would just be bar stool Racing if I said I considered your records to be soft... I've never done it, so what right do I have....

I know other racers with Stout, as you put it, records in other classes... They themselves will tell you, after tons of time and money you can't go much faster in that class with that Fuel unless you get perfect conditions and put someone the size of an 8 year old on it... Again because they have fought their way to that point, and I have not, I'd have to say knowing what's in the bike that yeah they are on the ragged edge of being forced into another class already and that may be the only way to see more speed.

So really only the ones who actually do, can say what is or is not solid. You say your records are soft, to you yes they are... To me they are a mountain I've not attempted to climb. I say mine are soft, but it's because I know the mistakes I made and after running over and over see where I may have gone wrong.

I could never look at another record and say it's weak cause I thought I'd go a lot faster based on my concrete riding experience.... Then again vets of salt sidecars said they expected it to be slower... Guess at the end of the day, the great white Dyno makes that call... Soft stout, no, just respect for anyone doing it is my call... And I'm not going to say who is weak or strong, everyone makes a great effort no matter how fast they run.
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: debgeo on March 24, 2014, 11:28:00 PM
Well Stated :-) :-) :-)
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Nortonist 592 on March 26, 2014, 11:23:36 PM
i don't know how many times I've been told by Bonneville old timers "A records a record".  Long story short.  2012 I took the sidecar to run on "soft" records.  99 gas, 101 fuel.  Came home with 118 for the gas and 128 for the fuel.  I considered the 118 to be soft.  A good friend went to WF and bumped my gas record to 121.  I thought 121 was soft.  Figured it should be 8-10 mph faster.  Went back last year to get "my" record back.  I spent all week beating my head against a wall.  In the end I managed to bump the "soft" record by .511 mph.  Pride?  It had long gone out the window.  I went to impound.

But lets get the "weels on steecks" out and go race.

(http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/823/i9m5.jpg) (https://imageshack.com/i/mvi9m5j)
Title: Re:
Post by: Hellcat Customs on March 27, 2014, 12:04:08 AM
Agreed, good Man
Title: Re: Motorcycle "Records" - Really??
Post by: Stainless1 on March 27, 2014, 10:01:08 AM
I would bet a beer that no records are the fastest that person has gone with their vehicle in that class.... safe bet.... because it is an average of 2 runs... circumstances of the runs control the outcome.
A record is a record, and they are all subject to be broken... soft, stiff and stout  :cheers: