The problem with using Mig is that the lower heat input results in a narrow HAZ and faster cooling rates, which in turn can lead to a hard and brittle HAZ.
That is what I'm talking about. I've always thought that MIG puts the heat into the filler so the base tends to act as a heat sink. Tig puts more heat into the base metal. All other things being equal I think the MIG should be more brittle due to a faster cooling rate, in any metal.
Mig works well on mild steel because the low carbon equivalency, a product of carbon and other elements, doesn not promote the formation of martensite even at extremely rapid cooling rates. 1020 steel can be water quenched and it will remain ductile.
Exactly right, although water quench will make martensite if thin sections. The main reason 4130 is not allowed to MIG weld is because the rapid cooling combined with the low alloy chrome moly material causes martensite to form in the HAZ. Marteniste is brittle. Gas or TIG has slow enough cooling you do not form martensite. The problem is not the size of the HAZ, it is the cooling rate. There is a region in the HAZ that is in the austenitic temp and will cool through transition, you want that transition to be slow and not form martensite. I am a metallurgical engr, the basic answer is what I stated. Of course there can be outside circumstances and other variables, but in general, MIG and chrome-moly will produce a brittle HAZ region. Post weld heat treating can be done, but it has to be done on the whole assy in a controlled furnace, but then you get distortion coming into the picture. Not possible to do effective PWHT with a torch.
