Landracing Forum Home
May 24, 2012, 11:03:58 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
BACK TO LANDRACING.COM HOMEPAGE
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: rear end power loss info  (Read 2279 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
saltfever
Guest
« Reply #15 on: December 16, 2008, 05:56:10 PM »

Thanks folks. smiley  I'll research both proccesses and look for a west coast source.
Logged
Bob Drury
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 65
Location: Vancouver,Wa.
Posts: 1636


« Reply #16 on: December 16, 2008, 06:38:10 PM »

  Larry, I would be careful about some racers claim.  Several years ago the cars of Warren a Kurt Johnson carried sponsorship decals for a Cryogenic company.  Turns out that Warren tried using it on his Lathe tooling for bucks on his race car
  I am not saying that Cryo (for instance) doesn't work, nor any other process, but I wonder how much a coating  or the REM process can help in 60-90 weight rear end lube.
  p.s.  unless you are banging gears, I think you could run virtually any domestic rear end you want.  It's the big torque motors that need tough gears on the salt...............
Logged

Bob Drury
38Chevy454
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Age: 48
Location: Tijeras, NM (Albuquerque)
Posts: 97


« Reply #17 on: December 22, 2008, 04:13:05 PM »

Some quick metallurgist answers:
Cold treating is done to reduce the amount of retained austenite in the quenched parts.  Retained austenite is bad for dimensional stability and ductility.  Under stress it transforms to untempered martensite, which is very hard and brittle.  All quenched parts are tempered to give higher ductility.  Strength does go down with tempering, but without it the parts would be too brittle, like a file.

REM surface treatment is really just improving the surface finish by removing the peaks.  Reducing friction so you have the lubrication film between metal parts and not metal peak to metal peak contact.  A set of old worn in gears has basically the same effect, the contact surfaces are polished down.  The REM (or whatever name you want to call it) is just providing a head start on this.

My opinion is that these both do provide benefit, but more for reliability than for ultimate hp savings.  That's my two Lincoln's worth.
Logged

I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.....
desotoman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: So Cal.
Posts: 1845


Temple's "Got'Cha"


« Reply #18 on: December 22, 2008, 05:15:24 PM »

John,

I tested both at 2.47, from the quick change to the Ford 9” we gained about 6 HP.  It was interesting when we went to the 12 bolt drop in and it jumped to 10 HP.  My car is HP limited and runs on gas, so the only way is to gain the lost HP.  Remember 75% of the horsepower loss occurs in the drive train.

I found the post I was looking for. I thought this was useful information.

Tom G.
Logged

"Got'Cha" was first run in 1974. Bill Temple entered both 2 clubs in 1976 with records in AA/BGR. At El Mirage 201.79 and Bonneville at 220.

In 1977 Greg Temple started driving "Got'Cha" and entered the El Mirage Dirty 2 club in 1979 @ 201.97. Greg went on to set two records at Bonneville, one in 1981 at 241.848, then in 1991 he set another record at 262.230

Bill and Greg were the first father and son to enter the El Mirage Dirty 2 club. They broke the D/BFR at Bonneville in 1981 @ 241 with top speed of 249. This record still stands today. In 1991 they set the A/BFR @ 262 which was later broke by Duane McKinney.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 15, 2012, 09:56:04 AM