Landracing Forum Home
May 24, 2012, 09:37:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News:
BACK TO LANDRACING.COM HOMEPAGE
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: material tubing thickness  (Read 10899 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
willieworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 67
Location: 921 chicago ave modesto ca. 95351
Posts: 1818



« on: October 13, 2008, 04:28:17 PM »

Outside dia.       Advertised wall        Actual wall          At the bend outside
1 1/2 od                 .083 cm                 .083                 .081

1 1/2 od                 .125 dom                .126                 .122

1 5/8 od                 .120 ew                  .118                 .115

1 5/8 od                 .125 dom                 .126                 .123

1 1/4 od                 .134 ew                   .124                 .122

Straight section was sonic checked, outside of bend was sonic checked.
Some tubing not as advertised(nominal wall thickness). The smaller the radius on the bend equals the thinner material on outside of bend.
And the more degrees of bend the thinner material on the outside of bend.
This is just some testing I did today on a few random pieces of tubing I had around the shop. They are not all exactly the same bend and each tube size is different and some of the radius are different. But I think you get the idea.
If you need any testing in particular done let me know.
Willie Buchta


* 102_1823.JPG (58.99 KB, 774x580 - viewed 111 times.)

* 102_1822.JPG (52.62 KB, 774x580 - viewed 110 times.)
« Last Edit: October 13, 2008, 04:32:48 PM by willieworld » Logged

willie-dpombatmir-buchta
Cajun Kid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 50
Location: Winston Salem, North Carolina
Posts: 3076


Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford


« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2008, 05:15:44 PM »

Willie,, thanks that helps.. I was going to use .120 DOM... may use 1 3/4
.134/.135  DOM  instead.

Charles
Logged

ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  195.51mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 191.006mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 188.31mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com
willieworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 67
Location: 921 chicago ave modesto ca. 95351
Posts: 1818



« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2008, 05:46:19 PM »

charles--the mininum requirement is 1 5/8 .120 nominal wall ( THERE ARE SOME EXCEPTIONS ) if you use .120 wall dom you will be above the mininum----if you can break up the long pieces of tubing  with diagonals --bracing you will make the cage much stronger than going to a larger tube size --dont lull yourself into a false since of security with your roll cage it is actually the other safety equipment that keep you safe in an " upset "  ---the cage only keeps the car fron caving in on you ---and dont forget those gussets they make all of the connections twice as strong-----just some thoughts     willie buchta
« Last Edit: October 13, 2008, 05:56:24 PM by willieworld » Logged

willie-dpombatmir-buchta
Cajun Kid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 50
Location: Winston Salem, North Carolina
Posts: 3076


Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford


« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2008, 09:26:01 PM »

willie,  got it ... Gussets and Braces.... X Bracing, Diagonal Bracing, Cross Bracing, Sill Bars, Pro Stock/Funny Car set up,  Think we will be ok on the cage once we decide entry and exit (with my size)  need some well thought our drivers door swing outs (or lower x or y bracing so I can slide in and roll out ..lol)

The Chassis and Suspension is the big project... Have not decided on type of front suspension...Several Ideas floating around, but nothing final..
Not sure how much caster adjustment can get with a trick coilover Mustang II, or Tubular A arm IFS set up will yield..or how bump steer may come to play. The dropped straight axle like the Vicky is another idea, but using parallel leafs, but not sure how low we can go that way and how adjustable it can be..?? 

 Almost certain will use 4 link and coil overs in rear with Panard Bar and sway bar. (Vicky has Pete and Jakes long ladder bars, and Panhard set up with adj coilovers)

Well my brain hurts thinking of all the possible combinations...

Charles

Logged

ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  195.51mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 191.006mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 188.31mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com
saltfever
Guest
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2008, 10:04:01 PM »

Great information, Willie. Thanks for posting it. smiley

What kind of sonic tester do you have and what do they cost? I would like to get one primarily for engine blocks. Any thoughts or experience using them...
Logged
willieworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 67
Location: 921 chicago ave modesto ca. 95351
Posts: 1818



« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2008, 10:55:50 PM »

saltfever---i bought the sonic checker in 1993 --at that time it was expensive i think about 1200 dollars--they are probably cheaper now---it is made by the staveley instrument co in kennewick wa.---when i bought it they had 3 options for the pickup ( concave--convex--flat ) the pickup was 300 dollars so i just got one (flat)  it works well on flat and round tubing  --it is accurate to .001 in 2 inches  close enough for me ---i use it on tubing and cylinder head ports -keeps me out of the water jackets --even on the harley heads it lets me know how much meat i have left--i use to  build nhra chassis and they required a sonic check--never had one fail --it is very easy to use --i will bring it to el mirage in a couple of weeks if anybody wants anything tested look me up      willie buchta
Logged

willie-dpombatmir-buchta
Sumner
Global Moderator
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Age: 68
Location: Blanding, Utah
Posts: 2839


Blanding, Ut..a small dot in the middle of nowhere


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2008, 11:09:15 PM »

....................Not sure how much caster adjustment can get with a trick coilover Mustang II, or Tubular A arm IFS set up will yield..or how bump steer may come to play. .............................................................................

Don't forget that if you add weight like we have that you will need springs that will handle it.  Hooley has some kind of odd-ball coil overs for the mustang like suspension on the front that take springs that come in only limited spring rates.  I would design the front and rear in a way that you have a large spring rate selection available.

Great stuff on the tubing thickness Willie, thanks for doing that,

Sum
Logged

saltfever
Guest
« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2008, 03:43:36 AM »

saltfever---i bought the sonic checker in 1993 --at that time it was expensive i think about 1200 dollars--they are probably cheaper now---it is made by the staveley instrument co in kennewick wa.---when i bought it they had 3 options for the pickup ( concave--convex--flat ). . .

Thanks for getting back to me, Willie.  smiley I'll look them up. 
Logged
Cajun Kid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 50
Location: Winston Salem, North Carolina
Posts: 3076


Venable Rod's & Racing #805 Studebaker, #806 Ford


« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2008, 08:51:48 AM »

Sum, thanks for the heads up on the springs. My plan if going Mustang II or other IFS  was to use QA1 coilovers, they have at least 10 spring rates and full ride height, preload and dampaning adjustments.

Oh any luck on getting the spill plate and spolier templates for me... If you get them let me know and I will send you my address and postage.

Thanks

Charles
Logged

ECTA Record Holder Maxton
E/CBFALT, E/CBGALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT, A/CGALT, C/CGALT, D/CGALT, C/CBGALT, B/CBGALT, C/CFALT
OHIO
C/CGALT

LTA Record Holder
A/CBFALT, B/CBFALT, C/CBFALT, C/CFALT, E/CGALT, E/CFALT

Fastest Standing Mile at Ohio  195.51mph
Fastest Standing Mile at Maxton 191.006mph
Fastest Standing 1.5 Mile at Loring 188.31mph

http://s261.photobucket.com/albums/ii43/cajunkid5690/

Blog    www.venablerodsandracing.com
email   venableracing@gmail.com
panic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Hempstead, New York
Posts: 592


« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2008, 10:39:20 AM »

.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 05:26:49 PM by panic » Logged
willieworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Age: 67
Location: 921 chicago ave modesto ca. 95351
Posts: 1818



« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2008, 12:14:52 PM »

panic could you do a couple more of those  one with an upright in the middle with diagonals running top right to bottom left  and one with one diaogenal running from top  right to bottom left and the other diaogenal running from bottom right to top left  ---smaller triangles with about the same amount of material  -thanks  willie buchta
Logged

willie-dpombatmir-buchta
panic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Hempstead, New York
Posts: 592


« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2008, 01:11:11 PM »

.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 05:27:05 PM by panic » Logged
panic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Hempstead, New York
Posts: 592


« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2008, 01:16:01 PM »

.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 05:27:19 PM by panic » Logged
panic
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Location: Hempstead, New York
Posts: 592


« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2008, 01:36:41 PM »

.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 05:27:47 PM by panic » Logged
saltfever
Guest
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2008, 03:13:07 PM »

Guys, I am following this thread with a lot of interest. Great stuff and thanks to you both. However, I'm a little confused about Panic's last post. You are referring to an Excel program. Was this program posted in another thread and is public? (If yes, please point to it). Or is this a program you created and is personal?  Great example though, on the effectiveness of geometry vs. mass.  wink
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page May 23, 2012, 10:12:32 PM